[問題] 婚攝單拍喜宴報價3000元被嫌貴?
雖然本人只拍過5場 不過其他幫朋友拍活動 好歹都面臨過各種環境
想說賺點外快 也不敢開上萬的天價
在結婚版上應徵婚攝 只有午宴 剛好地點離我家走路就到 3000元全包 對方還回覆說貴
其他的例如早上儀式+午宴 我報價5000元 報了7 8個都石沈大海沒回應
難道現在婚攝這麼廉價嘛? 還是單眼太多造成低價搶殺 破壞行情?
那些開上萬元天價的攝影師還要一年前預約? 連婚攝市場都m型社會?
--
補充
現在我的器材 5D2 24-105 580閃燈 這應該只是職業的備用機而以吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 220.136.185.224
推
11/29 13:24, , 1F
11/29 13:24, 1F
推
11/29 13:25, , 2F
11/29 13:25, 2F
→
11/29 13:25, , 3F
11/29 13:25, 3F
推
11/29 13:26, , 4F
11/29 13:26, 4F
想說那是個案就算了
可是其他的7-8個儀式+午宴報價5000元
我想這在業界已經是破壞行情價格 竟然都沒回應 有3個還是當天PO我就回的
看來也只有在這個版大家才會一起罵那些新人 出了這個版都會被嫌貴的>///<
還是說現在的新人 像要賣二手5D2過保快門破萬還賣4萬5不給殺價的人一樣嘛?
→
11/29 13:26, , 5F
11/29 13:26, 5F
→
11/29 13:28, , 6F
11/29 13:28, 6F
我承認我是因為拍攝場不夠多 所以不敢開太高
可是我發現 很多人都把婚攝當成跟其他工作人員一樣 認為給個2000元紅包就很多了
之前幫親戚拍還自己開車載伴郎 也才1800元紅包 比起駕駛多個600元而已....
→
11/29 13:30, , 7F
11/29 13:30, 7F
→
11/29 13:31, , 8F
11/29 13:31, 8F
→
11/29 13:31, , 9F
11/29 13:31, 9F
→
11/29 13:32, , 10F
11/29 13:32, 10F
→
11/29 13:33, , 11F
11/29 13:33, 11F
→
11/29 13:34, , 12F
11/29 13:34, 12F
推
11/29 13:34, , 13F
11/29 13:34, 13F
→
11/29 13:34, , 14F
11/29 13:34, 14F
→
11/29 13:37, , 15F
11/29 13:37, 15F
→
11/29 13:37, , 16F
11/29 13:37, 16F
→
11/29 13:37, , 17F
11/29 13:37, 17F
→
11/29 13:38, , 18F
11/29 13:38, 18F
→
11/29 13:39, , 19F
11/29 13:39, 19F
推
11/29 13:39, , 20F
11/29 13:39, 20F
→
11/29 13:39, , 21F
11/29 13:39, 21F
推
11/29 13:39, , 22F
11/29 13:39, 22F
→
11/29 13:39, , 23F
11/29 13:39, 23F
→
11/29 13:40, , 24F
11/29 13:40, 24F
推
11/29 13:40, , 25F
11/29 13:40, 25F
推
11/29 13:46, , 26F
11/29 13:46, 26F
推
11/29 13:47, , 27F
11/29 13:47, 27F
推
11/29 13:49, , 28F
11/29 13:49, 28F
推
11/29 13:55, , 29F
11/29 13:55, 29F
推
11/29 13:55, , 30F
11/29 13:55, 30F
已補充
推
11/29 14:13, , 31F
11/29 14:13, 31F
※ 編輯: BM2 來自: 220.136.185.224 (11/29 14:15)
→
11/29 14:15, , 32F
11/29 14:15, 32F
※ BM2:轉錄至看板 GetMarry 11/29 14:15
→
11/29 14:19, , 33F
11/29 14:19, 33F
→
11/29 14:24, , 34F
11/29 14:24, 34F
推
11/29 14:26, , 35F
11/29 14:26, 35F
推
11/29 14:28, , 36F
11/29 14:28, 36F
→
11/29 14:33, , 37F
11/29 14:33, 37F
→
11/29 14:33, , 38F
11/29 14:33, 38F
→
11/29 14:34, , 39F
11/29 14:34, 39F
→
11/29 14:34, , 40F
11/29 14:34, 40F
→
11/29 14:35, , 41F
11/29 14:35, 41F
推
11/29 14:43, , 42F
11/29 14:43, 42F
推
11/29 14:44, , 43F
11/29 14:44, 43F
推
11/29 15:01, , 44F
11/29 15:01, 44F
→
11/29 15:09, , 45F
11/29 15:09, 45F
推
11/29 15:10, , 46F
11/29 15:10, 46F
→
11/29 15:11, , 47F
11/29 15:11, 47F
→
11/29 15:11, , 48F
11/29 15:11, 48F
推
11/29 15:16, , 49F
11/29 15:16, 49F
→
11/29 15:16, , 50F
11/29 15:16, 50F
推
11/29 15:26, , 51F
11/29 15:26, 51F
→
11/29 15:27, , 52F
11/29 15:27, 52F
→
11/29 15:28, , 53F
11/29 15:28, 53F
推
11/29 15:35, , 54F
11/29 15:35, 54F
推
11/29 15:51, , 55F
11/29 15:51, 55F
→
11/29 16:25, , 56F
11/29 16:25, 56F
→
11/29 16:26, , 57F
11/29 16:26, 57F
推
11/29 16:27, , 58F
11/29 16:27, 58F
→
11/29 16:28, , 59F
11/29 16:28, 59F
推
11/29 16:32, , 60F
11/29 16:32, 60F
→
11/29 16:59, , 61F
11/29 16:59, 61F
推
11/29 17:08, , 62F
11/29 17:08, 62F
推
11/29 17:14, , 63F
11/29 17:14, 63F
→
11/29 17:16, , 64F
11/29 17:16, 64F
推
11/29 17:25, , 65F
11/29 17:25, 65F
推
11/29 17:33, , 66F
11/29 17:33, 66F
推
11/29 17:44, , 67F
11/29 17:44, 67F
→
11/29 17:44, , 68F
11/29 17:44, 68F
→
11/29 17:46, , 69F
11/29 17:46, 69F
推
11/29 18:04, , 70F
11/29 18:04, 70F
推
11/29 23:04, , 71F
11/29 23:04, 71F
→
11/29 23:04, , 72F
11/29 23:04, 72F
→
11/29 23:04, , 73F
11/29 23:04, 73F
→
11/29 23:07, , 74F
11/29 23:07, 74F
→
11/30 00:01, , 75F
11/30 00:01, 75F
→
11/30 01:29, , 76F
11/30 01:29, 76F
→
11/30 01:29, , 77F
11/30 01:29, 77F
推
11/30 02:00, , 78F
11/30 02:00, 78F
推
11/30 12:55, , 79F
11/30 12:55, 79F
→
11/30 16:21, , 80F
11/30 16:21, 80F
推
11/30 21:04, , 81F
11/30 21:04, 81F
推
12/01 08:55, , 82F
12/01 08:55, 82F
→
12/01 08:57, , 83F
12/01 08:57, 83F
→
12/01 08:58, , 84F
12/01 08:58, 84F
→
12/01 12:53, , 85F
12/01 12:53, 85F
→
12/01 23:49, , 86F
12/01 23:49, 86F
推
12/08 03:30, , 87F
12/08 03:30, 87F
推
01/01 01:22, , 88F
01/01 01:22, 88F
→
08/18 17:02, , 89F
08/18 17:02, 89F
→
10/06 01:15, , 90F
10/06 01:15, 90F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):