作者查詢 / defent
作者 defent 在 PTT [ Examination ] 看板的留言(推文), 共74則
限定看板:Examination
看板排序:
全部Lawyer593FuMouDiscuss388MenTalk190GetMarry105Tainan103Boy-Girl93Examination74creditcard63THU_Talk43Gossiping41PublicIssue41LAW38iOS32DSLR28Modchip27Law-Basket25Accounting24PttLifeLaw23Salary23Steam22ChungLi18Emulator18CMWang17DC17PushDoll16HCKuo13SMSlife12StupidClown12joke11BoardGame10basketballTW9PSP-PSV9PublicServan9cohabitation8Insurance7BabyMother5home-sale5Hong_Kong5Monkeys5MP3-player5TOEIC5Baseball4CarShop4Civil4GoodPregnan4HatePicket4iPod4WomenTalk4graduate3LawsuitSug3Lifeismoney3politics3Sijhih3study3Broken-heart2car2drawing2HatePolitics2HSNU_j1022marriage2Master_D2movie2NBA2NCUECON962Patent2TaichungBun2TKU_EW94B2Trans-nthu2TTU-AMath2Violation2WorldCup2AntiVirus1Artistic-Pho1ASHS-94-ye1BBSmovie1Beauty1BoardCourt1Cancer1CCJH-89g-3141CCU-GIE951CH7th3101CJCU1ck54th3311CMU_M511colorguard011CSMU-HSA961CSMU-M-SPORT1CTSH963011CYCU_CE92B1Dragons1DYU1EuropeTravel1FCSH_133101Finn1FJU-ACCR931FJU-ACCR941Free_box1FSHS-95-3081FTP1GuardRookies1Haruhi1HDFS_Bball1HSNU_10851HSNU_10981HSNU_11151HSNU_11171ISU_PBCM991Jeremy_Lin1JesusLove1KG92-3231KS94-3021KS94-3201L_LifePlan1MacShop1MCU-LAW1Militarylife1NBA_Film1NCCU07_Ghis1NCHU-AS1NCHU-FT-1011NCHU-KF1NCHUS1NCKU-PH991NCKU-physiol1NCYU_BE_95A1NDMC-PH231NTHU-EE-CAPT1NTHU_COM6071NTHU_STAT941NTPU-CRIM941NTPU-LAND90B1NTPU-STAT951NTPU-STATBAD1NTU-Karate1NTUE-DC991NTUST-MBA961NTUST-TIM961NTUT_Talk1NUK_AC981NY-Yankees1Old-Games1pay_home1Pet_boarding1petwork1PlayBaseball1SCU-BM-93B1SENIORHIGH1share1Softball1Stephen1Stock1taipin3261Taitung1Taoyuan1TigerBlue1TNFSH96121toberich1TuCheng1TWproducts1TY_Research1Wanted1YP91-3041Zhongshan1<< 收起看板(163)
2F→: 消費券10/19 23:09
3F→:02/03 07:59
13F→: 又一個奮青02/03 08:00
56F→: 沒有考過7次以上,沒資格放棄。我第七次上。12/24 22:20
3F→:樓上神邏輯03/16 10:22
1F→:為什麼要準用或類推適用?股份有限公司有監察人了呀。03/13 21:24
2F→:重點是平時有人,不是殺死之後沒有人03/11 09:28
3F→:做案時當下是有人的,就會構成17303/11 09:30
6F→:刑法處罰的是行為人行為的當下主客觀.....03/11 09:54
8F→:你知道你引的判決案例事實建築物就是你所謂的"客觀"沒有人?03/11 09:58
9F→:那為何最高法院還是論以173不論你所謂的174?03/11 09:59
12F→:查本件中山館於平日經常供教授及研究生日夜二十四小時使用03/11 10:03
13F→:,是次火災發生時之放火時,實為現有人所在之建築物,不因03/11 10:04
14F→:上訴人放火之時偶然無人在內而有異。03/11 10:04
15F→:以上是判決內容節錄。03/11 10:05
18F→:所以你覺得農舍到底平時有沒有人在內呢?03/11 10:08
20F→:殺死是殺人罪的問題,173的放火罪和殺人有什麼關係?03/11 10:11
1F→:這說法很怪,買賣球員難道構成買賣人口?03/09 08:29
2F→:那時應該是板橋地院不叫新北03/09 08:30
13F→:屁函居然在這........02/11 13:44
1F→:不放棄就沒失敗!辛苦了!01/25 04:54