作者查詢 / Bonjwa
作者 Bonjwa 在 PTT [ SP3_AllSport ] 看板的留言(推文), 共29則
限定看板:SP3_AllSport
看板排序:
全部NBA4483Gossiping4170HatePolitics2948Stock1869NBA_Film296basketballTW220joke220Jeremy_Lin144Tennis135Military127Olympics_ISG126movie100Tech_Job99Nets93Baseball89Beauty74Salary73G-S-WARRIORS64sex50ArenaOfValor47Lakers44Soft_Job44RealmOfValor41Option33Hawks30SP3_AllSport29WorldCup28StarCraft27DigiCurrency17SP2_Basket14MacShop13Golden-Award11BLAZERS10Moto_GP10VR8Badminton7Hornets7L_SecretGard7Lottery7NBAEasyChat7AntiVirus6IVERSON6Nuggets6PublicIssue5Raptors5Sportcenter5UTAH-JAZZ5eSports4LeBronJames4Militarylife4Oversea_Job4WomenTalk4About_Life3Cavaliers3GossipPicket3TaiwanBeer3VinceCarter3ChicagoBulls2CourtBasketB2CourtSports2FAPL2Finance2L_TalkandCha2MiamiHeat2nb-shopping2PhD2tabletennis2Wizards2YOLO2AaronKwok1AC_In1Acad-Affairs1Anchors1BabyMother1Broad_Band1ck55th3111CrossStrait1DotA21e-shopping1emprisenovel1FuMouDiscuss1graduate1Hearthstone1home-sale1iOS1Kaohsiung1KingdomHuang1Kings1KMU1Liu1Marginalman1Mavericks1Nantou1NBA_Fantasy1NetSecurity1NTU1NTUmed001Orl-Magic1Pelicans1Rockets1SAN1Sixers1Spurs1StephenCurry1SteveNash131TaichungBun1Tainan1Teacher1Thunder1Timberwolves1TPC_Police1Trading1TY_Research1WorkinChina1WOW1<< 收起看板(115)
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁
1F推: 美國郭台銘 美國韓國瑜 大哥求你了~04/14 06:31
5F→: 先感謝協助,由於深夜撰文故:223.137.0.72 05/10 19:20
6F→: 1、改下語氣 調整順序與錯字223.137.0.72 05/10 19:21
7F→: 2、增補一些說明如下:223.137.0.72 05/10 19:22
8F→: a.統整小結,簡化結論223.137.0.72 05/10 19:22
9F→: b.增加對比n板主之前判決的看法223.137.0.72 05/10 19:23
10F→: 今晚會編修完成,再予推文知會tks223.137.0.72 05/10 19:24
11F→: 已編輯完成,謝謝!再麻煩了180.176.136.43 05/11 00:24
1F→: 先感謝Vedan多字回覆。但可惜的是220.128.141.203 05/03 16:25
2F→: 在審判上需著重的證據主義、論理法220.128.141.203 05/03 16:26
3F→: 則與經驗法則皆未予依此角度切入,220.128.141.203 05/03 16:27
4F→: 比較像說理大框架而未就案論案就事220.128.141.203 05/03 16:28
5F→: 論事。若避開了上述原則,而進行大220.128.141.203 05/03 16:29
6F→: 論述,自然無法判斷出個案上的差距220.128.141.203 05/03 16:30
7F→: 與不同了。但此案在離題與政治審查220.128.141.203 05/03 16:31
8F→: 上確有判斷與一審程序上之錯誤並未220.128.141.203 05/03 16:33
9F→: 看到您的重視與論述,實為可惜。本220.128.141.203 05/03 16:33
10F→: 人會再上訴,並從中回應本篇論點。220.128.141.203 05/03 16:34
11F→: 再謝~220.128.141.203 05/03 16:34
6F→: 真的無言…220.128.141.203 04/30 11:28
1F推: 補充個反證法說明:若3-3因模糊空間60.251.129.13 01/05 10:25
2F→: 卻判得更嚴那麼又何需訂定硬限制呢?60.251.129.13 01/05 10:26
3F→: 故非硬限制者重點應著重是否多次、60.251.129.13 01/05 10:28
4F→: 重覆、鬧板、抵毀、造謠等而非批評60.251.129.13 01/05 10:29
5F→: 避免日後連"可憐吶、嘻嘻"之類的都60.251.129.13 01/05 10:31
6F→: 被延伸為違規,此非但不合理且徒增60.251.129.13 01/05 10:33
7F→: 板務管理、裁決難以公平評判之困擾60.251.129.13 01/05 10:34
1F推: 收到已修改,感謝提醒!60.251.129.13 12/28 17:40
2F→: 另補充新內容於上訴案60.251.129.13 12/28 17:41
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁