作者查詢 / amaranth

總覽項目: 發文 | 留言 | 暱稱
作者 amaranth 在 PTT [ SAN ] 看板的留言(推文), 共791則
限定看板:SAN
看板排序:
全部JinYong7899C_Chat6898Palmar_Drama4524Suckcomic3043medstudent1829gallantry1230Yunlin1017medache992DummyHistory976Chan_Mou951Warfare921historia912KingdomHuang867Touhou845SAN791ONE_PIECE673Little-Games593Ocean584CFantasy505Tea455CVS432Gossiping429DragonBall428HK_Comics412movie411Drink354fastfood294Redology291Nantou270SlamDunk264LightNovel222NBA207Anti-ramp201SAN-YanYi198TaichungCont194Baseball179Seiya170WarringState162basketballTW160emprisenovel159H-GAME157SuperHeroes148Native118PublicIssue111consumer106HK-movie106The-fighting99FAIRYTAIL89JOJO78CHING76RIVER71KenAkamatsu63ChangHua62cookclub62Comic53Gulong53GUNNM49Lodoss48PushDoll48Olympics_ISG47FuMouDiscuss45PttLifeLaw45RumikoTWorld42Azumanga41Old-Games36Wan-Ray-An36StarWars34Haruhi33BBSmovie32C_Question30AC_In28ChineseMed28EatToDie26HCKuo26Evangelion25YUYUHAKUSHO25customers24fruits24MartialArts24TY_Research24joke23Employee21BAHAMUT20PublicHealth20cookcomic19CPU_FS74119HSNU_106619Tin-Ha19CPBL17SKYU17Oh-GREAT15Weyslii14JapanHistory13SuckcomicBM13magic_silver12MemoriesOff12home-sale11PlayStation11TamShui11Ancient10Chinese10TANAKA10C_ChatBM9Doctor-Info9FSS9SchoolRumble9Akimine8Fantasy8ARIA7Food7Hokuto7I-Lan7Monkeys7PublicServan7Stock7UTAH-JAZZ7Miaoli6ShamanKing6Slayers6Tsao6Yabuki6CartoonNet5Celtics5CSMU-N955GHIBLI5Goddess5Kaiouki5Korea5Lakers5LAW5MGL-history5Ptt-Charity5StupidClown5TuTsau5BaseballSYS4BigBanciao4Cobras4Conan4CSMU-MED934Disabled4HatePolitics4hypermall4KevinGarnett4MLB4Nurse4Ourmovies4TFSHS69th3184Therapist4WomenTalk4X_Z_Zhou4AnimMovie3biker3Bucks3DPP3Gov_owned3HSNU_11033Keelung3Marines3NCKU_MEPhC3NTUST-DC-B963pharmacist3PSY-BSKT3SWORD3TLDS3VideoCard3YAKYU3YOLO3Yoma-Masashi3YUGIOH3YZU_CN99A3ANIMAX2Aquarium2Arina2Beauty2BioHazard2BraveSaga2Catholic2Chiayi2CMWang2CYSH97Y3182DoReMi2Dragons2Examination2EYESHIELD212FengYuan2Ghost-Shell2HerbTea2HK-drama2HRM2HSNU_10372Isayama2kendo2Kitty_Sanrio2KS97-3152LaClippers2Marginalman2MdnCNhistory2MiamiHeat2MMD_TDCG2MONSTER2NKFUST-CCE902NTUCE-1012Nuggets2optical2Pistons2PokeMon2Policy2RSSH93_3032SENIORHIGH2Sheena2ShyugoGetten2SMJH-89-3092SportComic2STUST2SurvivalGame2TA_AN2tenchi2TW-history2WhiteEyes2YCChen2Ang_Lee1Anti-Cancer1AppleDaily1b962040XX1b964060XX1balaz1basketball1BLAZERS1Buddhism1Bunco1C_WorkBoard1CAFENCAKE1CCF1CCSH_87_3161Childhood1ChiLing1Christianity1Chunichi1ckbc1cksh80th3071CMU_M481CMU_M491Coffee1CrossStrait1CSI1CSMU-HSA961CTAD1CTSH933031CTSH963011Doraemon1Ecophilia1Eng_PingPong1FCU_ECON_93B1FiremanLife1FJU_Chiayun1FJUHisBASKET1Grizzlies1Hawks1Hiking1HLHS_10thU1Hornets1HSNU_10581HSNU_11091HSNU_8201HSNU_9041Hualien1Hunter1japanavgirls1jhs_series1KenShin1KERORO1KS94-3121KS94-3211KS95-3111KS96-3051KS97-3161Lo-Sheng1love-vegetal1Mavericks1media-chaos1Minecraft1Mongolia1Nadal1NCCU00_RMI1NCCU01_ETHNO1NCCU04_CHI1NCCU07_CHIS1NCCU08_AT-A1NCCU08_HISTO1NCHU-AGR061NCHU-PP871NCHU_CsHsnu1NCHUAGRMENBK1NDMC-D621newagemusic1NTNUch-961NTUCH-901NTUnba20051NTUniNews1NTUR961230XX1Nurarihyon1NYUST99_FING1OCU1OgreBattle1OOfuri1Orl-Magic1PDA1Penny_11pet1Pet_Get1Pharmacy1Pilots1PINGU1Post1Prospect1PureYouth1R951210XX1regimen1Rockets1SCU_LawFB1SF1SFFamily1Shokugeki1SOS1Sportcenter1STDM-91-3021Steam1STREET_BALL1STU1studyabroad1SuperBike1SW_Job1SYSOP1Tai-travel1TaichungBun1Taitung1TaiwanDrama1tale1Test1TFSHS61st3211TheMatrix1TigerBlue1TKU_CME96B1travel1TWproducts1TWSU1WATARU1WorldCup1WuLing46-3171<< 收起看板(349)
Re: [心得] 劉備的統御能力 III
[ SAN ]44 留言, 推噓總分: +3
作者: snakylin - 發表於 2009/06/11 08:27(16年前)
8Famaranth:1.江表傳是吳史,而對照蜀書馬上打槍,荊南四郡是劉備打的06/11 13:17
9Famaranth:換句話說"假使"真有借,也只是口頭承認討個便宜而已06/11 13:18
10Famaranth:其次周瑜此時根本跟曹仁打的咪咪毛毛,去哪打荊南來借?06/11 13:19
11Famaranth:你的推文回應還是一樣難以理解,要說也是跟孫權說,找劉備?06/11 13:20
33Famaranth:客觀說你一遇到意見跟你不同其實就開始放中大絕了,修養真06/11 18:09
34Famaranth:的不能算非常好沒錯,光是不認同你就叫找碴?06/11 18:10
35Famaranth:依這裡過去的慘烈戰況來看,其實還沒有人算在找你碴喔XD06/11 18:12
Re: [心得] 劉備的統御能力 III
[ SAN ]24 留言, 推噓總分: +2
作者: chordate - 發表於 2009/06/11 00:24(16年前)
20Famaranth:史書引用自己要注意前因後果跟相對可信度,不是一句只挑自06/11 03:53
21Famaranth:己相信,赤壁敗於疾病魏蜀吳同時記載可信度就比較高06/11 03:55
22Famaranth:劉備得荊州是自己打下來的,他也沒有對孫權低頭之意06/11 03:55
23Famaranth:會對孫吳搞這種低姿態動作本身就比較不合理06/11 03:56
Re: [心得] 劉備的統御能力 III
[ SAN ]126 留言, 推噓總分: +6
作者: snakylin - 發表於 2009/06/10 23:33(16年前)
25Famaranth:誰吃人夠夠很明顯是孫權,借荊州是怎麼回事我在之前就回過06/11 00:18
27Famaranth:孫權私自把荊州視為口中肥肉,被曹仁扁完才在眼紅劉備拿下06/11 00:20
28Famaranth:荊南,借荊州第一次只是借口頭承認實為和談之舉06/11 00:21
29Famaranth:第二次是放棄狹長領土把防線壓力轉給劉備負責06/11 00:21
30Famaranth:益州啥的講難聽點就是孫權在和談協商後仍然死性不改想偷06/11 00:22
32Famaranth:做小動作被打槍而已;呂蒙基本上是戰略眼光短淺的人06/11 00:23
35Famaranth:只見眼前利益,卻沒去考慮國際情勢..還是他早知孫權強運?06/11 00:24
52Famaranth:不要回不了就放大絕,很難看也沒有意義06/11 00:42
53Famaranth:呂蒙被罵到翻天的問題就在他的眼睛只能看到有機會搶荊州06/11 00:43
55Famaranth:卻完全沒有想到搶了荊州再來會怎樣,要怎麼辦06/11 00:44
57Famaranth:要不是孫權強運+曹丕腦殘,等到蜀軍在東曹軍渡江直逼,孫權06/11 00:44
59Famaranth:就會改口指著呂蒙鼻子痛罵子明誤我一生06/11 00:45
66Famaranth:蜀軍在西,打錯了..orz06/11 00:50
67Famaranth:連魏人都認為劉備一定翻臉,只是曹丕腦殘猶豫不決06/11 00:51
70Famaranth:孫權沒被兩面夾擊只能說上輩子積福太多這輩子超強運06/11 00:52
73Famaranth:第三點就是他腦殘的地方,守得住就不用去抱曹丕要他別打06/11 00:53
74Famaranth:劉備被勸住+魏軍不打也可說是發牌就兩組同花順+三張二06/11 00:56
75Famaranth:總不會有人還沒發牌就相信會拿這種牌然後全下吧06/11 00:57
82Famaranth:你搞錯前因後果了好不好..-__-..能避開兩面作戰就是因為06/11 03:57
83Famaranth:曹丕腦殘猶豫不決錯失良機,讓他有機會跟劉備慢慢打06/11 03:58
84Famaranth:這不是事前能知道的事,曹丕會發兵南下才是主流意見06/11 03:59
85Famaranth:呂蒙被後人罵就是因為他根本不像有考慮到兩面作戰的危機06/11 04:00
86Famaranth:而孫權也跟著腦充血才會撩下去,事後強運不代表決定是對的06/11 04:00
87Famaranth:夷陵之戰後蜀軍消耗過大+劉備死亡,蜀軍暫時已無再戰能力06/11 04:02
88Famaranth:不然孫權絕對會繼續抱曹丕大腿直到蜀國退兵06/11 04:02
99Famaranth:會可以守是強運,最好有人重大決定是用強運當籌碼啦06/11 13:21
101Famaranth:可禦?如果孫權真的這樣認為那就真的腦殘+自大到家了06/11 13:22
103Famaranth:他全力以赴都在合肥被打的雞毛鴨血了06/11 13:23
105Famaranth:如果他真的自信到他能同時抵擋兩面,那合理的決策是配合06/11 13:23
106Famaranth:關羽北伐吸住曹軍,用那足以應付兩面的強大軍力往北打06/11 13:24
107Famaranth:換句話說,如果他不能兩面作戰,這決定是白目06/11 13:25
108Famaranth:如果他自信能兩面作戰,這決策還是一樣白目06/11 13:25
109Famaranth:從他決定放著真正敵人不管還幫對方削弱盟友時,腦就有礙了06/11 13:26
122Famaranth:那是強運,如果我手下用強運當決策原因,我會讓他去吃自己06/11 18:07
123Famaranth:結果沒出事不代表決策是對的,靠強運過關不是領導者該做的06/11 18:08
125Famaranth:你那是後人檢討結果的結果論,跟事前是否合理是兩回事06/12 13:41
126Famaranth:不然曹操打贏早就把勸他別打的人通通送去苦窯了06/12 13:42
127Famaranth:衛覬勸曹操不要故意刺激西涼諸將,曹操不聽引起韓馬之叛06/12 13:47
128Famaranth:結果結果是魏軍戰勝西涼底定的好結果,他還是更重視衛覬06/12 13:47
129Famaranth:照你的說法,因為魏軍打贏了所以衛覬的意見就是不正確06/12 13:48
130Famaranth:他幹嘛後悔當初不聽衛覬之言?06/12 13:49
[討論] 劉備於"新野大撤退"後的腹案
[ SAN ]15 留言, 推噓總分: +3
作者: pariah - 發表於 2009/05/30 20:38(16年前)
3Famaranth:我是跑到憤青板了嗎?05/31 00:32
Re: R: [問題] 陳登是不是死於吃生魚片(沙西米)?
[ SAN ]12 留言, 推噓總分: +5
作者: pariah - 發表於 2009/05/26 22:15(16年前)
2Famaranth:就算是現在淡水魚一樣不建議生食,現代醫療可以救05/27 07:44
[閒聊] 三國演義的龍套們
[ SAN ]11 留言, 推噓總分: +5
作者: LeoLionLin - 發表於 2009/04/10 20:14(16年前)
1Famaranth:戲志才正史也才一句而已,要掰也沒搞頭當然是省略掉啦04/11 00:04
2Famaranth:我本來很期待陳某火鳳會讓他登場的說,高評價又沒紀錄的04/11 00:05
3Famaranth:角色正好讓他隨意發揮,不過看起來是不會出現了04/11 00:06
[請益] 三國志和三國演義的書
[ SAN ]4 留言, 推噓總分: +2
作者: reccalfp - 發表於 2009/03/04 21:25(17年前)
3Famaranth:演義直接看原版的版本即可,三國志的話我是都看線上版啦..03/05 04:27
Re: [轉錄]Re: [閒聊] 有關三國有沒有單挑?:
[ SAN ]29 留言, 推噓總分: +3
作者: ilgsu - 發表於 2009/02/21 16:37(17年前)
26Famaranth:通篇廢話...要玩繞口令跟無意義文字遊戲自己去架blog02/24 01:09
Re: [問題] 劉禪為何投降鄧艾?
[ SAN ]1 留言, 推噓總分: +1
作者: tenweli - 發表於 2009/02/18 00:17(17年前)
1Famaranth:其實還是有牌,只是還在南方需要等02/18 08:14
[問題] 有關諸葛亮和司馬懿的對峙
[ SAN ]8 留言, 推噓總分: +2
作者: hongmorning - 發表於 2009/01/21 22:26(17年前)
1Famaranth:除非是長期攻城,沒人在帶那種巨大垃圾01/21 22:38
2Famaranth:司馬懿是在平原不是樹林紮營,火攻效果有限;對方死守不動01/21 22:39
3Famaranth:硬攻容易吃虧,司馬懿不敢會戰死龜不出就是寧可用被動防守01/21 22:41