作者查詢 / BioMachine

總覽項目：發文 | 留言 | 暱稱

作者 BioMachine 在 PTT [ DPP ] 看板的留言(推文), 共938則

限定看板：DPP

看板排序：

全部HatePolitics3270medstudent1176DPP938Gossiping689KMT420TSU68marriage63Thailand57politics48PublicIssue40WomenTalk33a-diane30TW-history30CMU_M4819Policy19TA_AN17CMU_M5116Feminism14L_SecretGard14NTU14CSMU-MED9612medache11CMU_CM43A10CMU_M5010CSMU-MED9110historia10Lawyer10media-chaos10NTUdent969CSMU-MED978Kaohsiung8CMU_M477CMU_M497CMU_M527FuMouDiscuss7IA6NTUdent946NTUdent956Olympics_ISG6CMU_CM425CMU_CM445CSMU-HSA985CSMU-MED985FEU5NTUmed925NYUST5SENIORHIGH5Bioindustry4CrossStrait4HSNU_9744Navy4NTCUST4Aviation3Best-Rulin3BobDylan3ck57th3153CSMU-D873CSMU-D893CSMU-D953CSMU-D963CSMU-D973CSMU-MED953CSMU-MT973DummyHistory3DYU3Emergency3joke3KS92-3033Militarylife3movie3NCHU-VM953NCHU-VM973NDMC-D613NDMC-D623NDMC-D633NDMC-M1063NDMC-M99c3NTU-TaTung3NTU_BOTDorm3NTUFS-983NTUmed933NTUST_Talk3OIT_main3PCSH91_3053RSSH95_3023Teacher3TFG07Shot3TP3223USC3Viator96Chia3Warfare3YHSH96013car2CHSH-93-3202ck60th3152CSMU-D982CSMU-MED942Ecophilia2ESP2JackLee2KOU2L_TalkandCha2LTK2NDMC-M1022NDMC-M1032NDMC-M1042NDMC-M1052NDMC-M1072NDMC-M1082NTUdent892NTUdent912NTUdent922NTUMCSA2Nurse2PoliticBM2PoliticLaw2PublicAffair2PublicBM2share2Stock2TuTsau2UTAH-JAZZ2Wanhua2WorkanTravel2WWR2YLJH_94-3012Africa1Ancient1AOSO_Lab1Army-Sir1ASIA-uni1Aussiekiwi1BigShiLin1Boston1Boy-Girl1CCRomance1Cga1CH-R807-921Cheer1ck54th3321ck58th3021ck59th3121CLHS-50-141CMU_NEWs1Cross_Life1CSMU-M-SPORT1CT24th3371CYCU_MIS_93B1DramaTalk1Engineer1eslite1FCU_ECON_93B1FLAT_CLUB1France1gallantry1Golden-Award1GossipPicket1GreenParty1HCHS933141HSNU_11071Kids_Sucker1KingofPop1Marxism1MCU_Talk1MdnCNhistory1Military1MMC_MED1MRT1NCCU05_GIDS1NCCU_TEA1NCU_MATH861NHU_Talk1NTHU_LST_941NtuDormM21NTUE-DC991NTUEE_SI1NTUmed941NTUmed951NTUND901NTUSA1pharmacist1SCU_Chin96C1sinica1STDM-97-301A1Taiwanlit1tale1Tennis1TKU_EW94B1TMCSA1TTU-I91A1Viator96Gang1wearefriends1WorldCup1YP93-3121<< 收起看板(194)

首頁

尾頁

[閒聊] 來看看媒抗的好文章

[ DPP ]45 留言, 推噓總分: +16

作者: BioMachine - 發表於 2008/05/11 00:05(17年前)

7^F→BioMachine:我那篇根本不算反串文這種指控很無謂61.224.40.126 05/11 00:29

12^F→BioMachine:我坦坦蕩蕩沒反串就是沒反串61.224.40.126 05/11 00:31

13^F→BioMachine:當然如果硬說我反串能讓你很快樂61.224.40.126 05/11 00:32

14^F→BioMachine:那就盡管說罷!61.224.40.126 05/11 00:32

19^F→BioMachine:和反串是否差不多我是不知道啦我只知61.224.40.126 05/11 00:35

20^F→BioMachine:道這年頭有不少反串功力很弱串到後來61.224.40.126 05/11 00:36

21^F→BioMachine:根本就只是造成討論錯亂61.224.40.126 05/11 00:36

24^F→BioMachine:很明顯那篇是在幹譙阿61.224.40.126 05/11 00:41

25^F→BioMachine:況且我前一篇立論立場很清楚國文程度61.224.40.126 05/11 00:42

26^F→BioMachine:再差的想必都很了解我的立場為何61.224.40.126 05/11 00:42

27^F→BioMachine:還有我這要下線了留著好肝在不怕以61.224.40.126 05/11 00:46

28^F→BioMachine:後沒得爆別說我故意不回應囉61.224.40.126 05/11 00:47

46^F→BioMachine:這種現象就是現在台灣政治的問題61.224.45.12 05/11 11:25

47^F→BioMachine:只有標籤沒有觀察更欠缺思考61.224.45.12 05/11 11:26

[心得] 台灣悲哀的地方

[ DPP ]36 留言, 推噓總分: +19

作者: roudolf - 發表於 2008/05/10 22:37(17年前)

6^F推BioMachine:這些網站也有有深度的好文61.224.40.126 05/10 23:25

7^F推BioMachine:不要以篇概全61.224.40.126 05/10 23:25

25^F推BioMachine:本版不鼓勵反串請留給不喜歡反串文的61.224.40.126 05/11 00:06

26^F推BioMachine:網友討論空間61.224.40.126 05/11 00:06

Re: [閒聊] 襪靠謝長廷你可以再更沒種一點..

[ DPP ]6 留言, 推噓總分: +4

作者: weitaivictor - 發表於 2008/05/10 14:20(17年前)

1^F推BioMachine:吳伯雄的"奧步說"都破功了....61.217.211.118 05/10 14:23

Re: [閒聊]溫暖民主進步黨全力支持邱義仁

[ DPP ]17 留言, 推噓總分: +5

作者: BioMachine - 發表於 2008/05/10 01:41(17年前)

9^F→BioMachine:是的護航本來就是人的言論自由61.216.7.74 05/10 10:42

10^F→BioMachine:這本來就和批判一樣，都是開放的無所61.216.7.74 05/10 10:43

11^F→BioMachine:謂"開放護航"的問題61.216.7.74 05/10 10:44

17^F→BioMachine:說的好像還真的有"不許"呢!61.216.7.113 05/10 18:00

Re: [閒聊]溫暖民主進步黨全力支持邱義仁

[ DPP ]50 留言, 推噓總分: +28

作者: arsenentu - 發表於 2008/05/09 21:11(17年前)

30^F推BioMachine:要反串 PTT也不是沒有地方給他們去反串61.216.4.112 05/09 23:14

33^F推BioMachine:是嗎?到南方媒抗發這種文一樣是反串阿61.216.4.112 05/09 23:14

Re: [問題] 請問各位還在支持民進黨的版友！

[ DPP ]13 留言, 推噓總分: +5

作者: PlasmidDNA - 發表於 2008/05/09 17:00(17年前)

11^F推BioMachine:最後一句話除了顯示自己的專斷心態61.216.4.112 05/09 23:25

12^F推BioMachine:根本就沒什麼建設性可言61.216.4.112 05/09 23:25

Re: [討論] 搶救國文聯盟又來了....

[ DPP ]43 留言, 推噓總分: +4

作者: BioMachine - 發表於 2008/05/07 00:01(17年前)

6^F→BioMachine:嗯願聞閣下高見61.217.213.177 05/07 00:05

9^F→BioMachine:如果如你所說國中生學中文好多年都還61.217.213.177 05/07 00:07

10^F→BioMachine:學不好你給他看文言會有什麼幫助61.217.213.177 05/07 00:07

14^F→BioMachine:時數多卻沒有好教學內容只是浪費時間61.217.213.177 05/07 00:08

17^F→BioMachine:建議你去回一篇比較能說清楚61.217.213.177 05/07 00:09

22^F→BioMachine:最好是你以為我沒去過部落看過喔61.217.213.177 05/07 00:12

24^F→BioMachine:或許你該了解該校的學生族群比例61.217.213.177 05/07 00:12

25^F→BioMachine:不是山上就等於原住民61.217.213.177 05/07 00:13

28^F→BioMachine:你去查一下比例就可以知道答案了61.217.213.177 05/07 00:13

Re: [討論] 搶救國文聯盟又來了....

[ DPP ]77 留言, 推噓總分: +12

作者: BioMachine - 發表於 2008/05/06 00:38(17年前)

7^F→BioMachine:那恐怕二三類組應該增加的是英文教學긠61.216.2.217 05/06 00:51

10^F→BioMachine:時數因為學習的課本往往是英文61.216.2.217 05/06 00:51

12^F→BioMachine:不是語文能力"不好" 就一定要去補的61.216.2.217 05/06 00:52

15^F→BioMachine:也該看看其他學門能力如何吧61.216.2.217 05/06 00:52

16^F→BioMachine:總之我只想點出二三類國文教學時數多61.216.2.217 05/06 00:53

18^F→BioMachine:過物理或是化學科不少61.216.2.217 05/06 00:53

20^F→BioMachine:要說基本語文國中教的就差不多了61.216.2.217 05/06 00:54

23^F→BioMachine:我同意你的說法那請問該聯盟主張增加61.216.2.217 05/06 00:55

25^F→BioMachine:文言文比例是有對邏輯培養有直接助益61.216.2.217 05/06 00:55

27^F→BioMachine:少來啦難道我聯考國文頂標在我之下就61.216.2.217 05/06 00:56

28^F→BioMachine:都是語文能力不好嗎?不是吧不能這麼武61.216.2.217 05/06 00:56

30^F→BioMachine:斷就去說別人語文能力不好吧61.216.2.217 05/06 00:56

37^F→BioMachine:少來語文能力"不好" 你要看不好到哪裡61.216.2.217 05/06 00:58

38^F→BioMachine:是否有礙溝通他的其它能力是否又足夠?61.216.2.217 05/06 00:58

40^F→BioMachine:今天去加強他語文是否對他是最好選擇?61.216.2.217 05/06 00:59

44^F→BioMachine:我只是覺得很奇怪阿 "以前"人的溝通能61.216.2.217 05/06 00:59

45^F→BioMachine:力和語言能力到底好到哪去了?61.216.2.217 05/06 01:00

47^F→BioMachine:在我看來這些作家說新一代語文能力不61.216.2.217 05/06 01:00

48^F→BioMachine:好根本就像清末民初那些舊書生嫌新一61.216.2.217 05/06 01:01

49^F→BioMachine:代白話文學者一樣講白點就只是世代ꐠ61.216.2.217 05/06 01:02

51^F→BioMachine:間的一些情結...61.216.2.217 05/06 01:02

53^F→BioMachine:一句話說學生語文能力不好那給個量化61.216.2.217 05/06 01:03

55^F→BioMachine:標準做世代間的比較61.216.2.217 05/06 01:03

59^F→BioMachine:就同一個學力水準的學生做世代間比較61.216.2.217 05/06 01:05

61^F→BioMachine:你問我覺得有什麼差我是看不出來61.216.2.217 05/06 01:05

64^F→BioMachine:不知道你有沒有聽過老醫師幹譙年輕醫61.216.2.217 05/06 01:06

65^F→BioMachine:師病歷寫不好結果翻出當年舊病例看其61.216.2.217 05/06 01:07

66^F→BioMachine:實也不過爾爾的事人是會成長的61.216.2.217 05/06 01:07

67^F→BioMachine:當自己成長到一定程度之餘不要忘記自61.216.2.217 05/06 01:07

68^F→BioMachine:己以前是怎樣走上來的本來資歷不同世61.216.2.217 05/06 01:08

70^F→BioMachine:代不同觀念想法難免會有差異61.216.2.217 05/06 01:09

72^F→BioMachine:那到底是"習慣""次文化"問題還是真的61.216.2.217 05/06 01:10

73^F→BioMachine:"語言能力"問題還不一定咧61.216.2.217 05/06 01:11

75^F→BioMachine:語文能力強還是可以玩次文化阿只要他61.216.2.217 05/06 01:12

76^F→BioMachine:爽就好不是嗎?61.216.2.217 05/06 01:13

[討論] 搶救國文聯盟又來了....

[ DPP ]33 留言, 推噓總分: +9

作者: BioMachine - 發表於 2008/05/05 23:56(17年前)

7^F→BioMachine:看看余光中當年鄉土文學論戰的文章61.216.2.217 05/06 00:25

8^F→BioMachine:再來說他有說服力吧呵61.216.2.217 05/06 00:25

10^F→BioMachine:作家也不過是人也會吃喝拉撒也有意識61.216.2.217 05/06 00:45

11^F→BioMachine:形態甚至或許還有比你我多一點的情緒61.216.2.217 05/06 00:45

12^F→BioMachine:和偏執最好是作家的話有那麼可信啦!61.216.2.217 05/06 00:45

14^F→BioMachine:您是說楊振寧還是丁肇中比較不可信?61.216.2.217 05/06 00:49

15^F→BioMachine:科科61.216.2.217 05/06 00:50

[問題] 大安區派誰補選立委??

[ DPP ]42 留言, 推噓總分: +17

作者: a2032016 - 發表於 2008/05/03 20:33(17年前)

21^F推BioMachine:乾脆禮讓和第三社會黨關係不錯的蔣友柏61.224.44.220 05/03 23:58

22^F→BioMachine:不過我看他不可能出來唉61.224.44.220 05/03 23:59

首頁

尾頁