[討論] 為何不把英雄片的BOSS塑造超強.且不會輸
近幾年超級英雄片非常多
但每部英雄片的反派,跟漫畫中卻完全不同
漫畫毀天滅地,電影卻中二+極度弱化
說實在對於復3的薩諾斯,強度我也不抱期望了
不然實在很想看他像漫畫中那樣的狂虐英雄
為何不把超級英雄片的反派塑造成超強,讓英雄們打不贏才有絕望感
之後再想用何種方法可以婊到反派(向未來昔日就有塑造出絕望感)
雖然這樣可能會分成兩集比較適合
但是近期的BOSS,奧創or天啟
在電影中都被塑造出極度中二的樣子(薩德及毀滅日則毀在導演不會說故事= =)
當你知道超級英雄一定會贏的時候
但是中間打鬥過程卻只有特效,沒有戰術or從絕望中反抗最後勝利
久了實在會讓人無言
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 60.248.176.200
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1463622737.A.BE1.html
※ 編輯: gtrexh (60.248.176.200), 05/19/2016 09:53:05
推
05/19 09:53, , 1F
05/19 09:53, 1F
→
05/19 09:54, , 2F
05/19 09:54, 2F
→
05/19 09:55, , 3F
05/19 09:55, 3F
推
05/19 09:56, , 4F
05/19 09:56, 4F
推
05/19 09:58, , 5F
05/19 09:58, 5F
→
05/19 09:58, , 6F
05/19 09:58, 6F
推
05/19 09:58, , 7F
05/19 09:58, 7F
推
05/19 09:59, , 8F
05/19 09:59, 8F
推
05/19 10:00, , 9F
05/19 10:00, 9F
→
05/19 10:02, , 10F
05/19 10:02, 10F
→
05/19 10:02, , 11F
05/19 10:02, 11F
推
05/19 10:03, , 12F
05/19 10:03, 12F
→
05/19 10:05, , 13F
05/19 10:05, 13F
推
05/19 10:05, , 14F
05/19 10:05, 14F
→
05/19 10:15, , 15F
05/19 10:15, 15F
推
05/19 10:16, , 16F
05/19 10:16, 16F
→
05/19 10:16, , 17F
05/19 10:16, 17F
→
05/19 10:16, , 18F
05/19 10:16, 18F
推
05/19 10:20, , 19F
05/19 10:20, 19F
推
05/19 10:22, , 20F
05/19 10:22, 20F
推
05/19 10:27, , 21F
05/19 10:27, 21F
→
05/19 10:28, , 22F
05/19 10:28, 22F
推
05/19 10:29, , 23F
05/19 10:29, 23F
→
05/19 10:29, , 24F
05/19 10:29, 24F
推
05/19 10:32, , 25F
05/19 10:32, 25F
→
05/19 10:32, , 26F
05/19 10:32, 26F
推
05/19 10:34, , 27F
05/19 10:34, 27F
推
05/19 10:35, , 28F
05/19 10:35, 28F
→
05/19 10:36, , 29F
05/19 10:36, 29F
→
05/19 10:36, , 30F
05/19 10:36, 30F
推
05/19 10:36, , 31F
05/19 10:36, 31F
→
05/19 10:37, , 32F
05/19 10:37, 32F
推
05/19 10:38, , 33F
05/19 10:38, 33F
→
05/19 10:39, , 34F
05/19 10:39, 34F
→
05/19 10:39, , 35F
05/19 10:39, 35F
推
05/19 10:40, , 36F
05/19 10:40, 36F
→
05/19 10:42, , 37F
05/19 10:42, 37F
→
05/19 10:42, , 38F
05/19 10:42, 38F
→
05/19 10:43, , 39F
05/19 10:43, 39F
還有 35 則推文
推
05/19 12:14, , 75F
05/19 12:14, 75F
→
05/19 12:15, , 76F
05/19 12:15, 76F
→
05/19 12:15, , 77F
05/19 12:15, 77F
推
05/19 12:16, , 78F
05/19 12:16, 78F
推
05/19 12:23, , 79F
05/19 12:23, 79F
→
05/19 12:29, , 80F
05/19 12:29, 80F
→
05/19 12:30, , 81F
05/19 12:30, 81F
→
05/19 12:31, , 82F
05/19 12:31, 82F
→
05/19 12:32, , 83F
05/19 12:32, 83F
推
05/19 12:32, , 84F
05/19 12:32, 84F
→
05/19 12:32, , 85F
05/19 12:32, 85F
→
05/19 12:33, , 86F
05/19 12:33, 86F
推
05/19 12:36, , 87F
05/19 12:36, 87F
→
05/19 12:37, , 88F
05/19 12:37, 88F
→
05/19 12:39, , 89F
05/19 12:39, 89F
推
05/19 12:41, , 90F
05/19 12:41, 90F
→
05/19 12:41, , 91F
05/19 12:41, 91F
推
05/19 13:02, , 92F
05/19 13:02, 92F
→
05/19 13:02, , 93F
05/19 13:02, 93F
推
05/19 13:03, , 94F
05/19 13:03, 94F
推
05/19 13:04, , 95F
05/19 13:04, 95F
→
05/19 13:24, , 96F
05/19 13:24, 96F
推
05/19 13:36, , 97F
05/19 13:36, 97F
推
05/19 13:38, , 98F
05/19 13:38, 98F
→
05/19 13:38, , 99F
05/19 13:38, 99F
推
05/19 13:43, , 100F
05/19 13:43, 100F
推
05/19 14:24, , 101F
05/19 14:24, 101F
推
05/19 14:28, , 102F
05/19 14:28, 102F
推
05/19 14:46, , 103F
05/19 14:46, 103F
→
05/19 14:46, , 104F
05/19 14:46, 104F
→
05/19 14:49, , 105F
05/19 14:49, 105F
→
05/19 14:51, , 106F
05/19 14:51, 106F
噓
05/19 15:29, , 107F
05/19 15:29, 107F
推
05/19 15:51, , 108F
05/19 15:51, 108F
推
05/19 16:16, , 109F
05/19 16:16, 109F
→
05/19 16:36, , 110F
05/19 16:36, 110F
推
05/19 17:53, , 111F
05/19 17:53, 111F
→
05/19 20:21, , 112F
05/19 20:21, 112F
推
05/20 02:38, , 113F
05/20 02:38, 113F
推
05/20 14:08, , 114F
05/20 14:08, 114F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):