Re: [討論] 關於家用~
※ 引述《SeoBaby (SeoBaby)》之銘言:
: 結婚後買了房子,頭期款婆家出160w,我出210w...大致差不多
: 大伯(30y)是個媽寶,讀南部佛光山上的大學財經系畢業也沒交過女友,工作是婆婆叫公公幫他找的,月薪21k...去年10月辭職工作5年,現在說要考勞安執照,所以一年沒工作;另外有個小姑(24y)在超市也約21k。
: 婚前婆婆有說不用給孝親費,但是我跟老公總覺得不公平,畢竟我們房子不是沒貸款,20年的利息也等於一部國產車的錢。
: 另外老公22歲就沒住家裡(職軍),總覺得啃老族那麼多,大伯如果一直不結婚住家裡的...應該也要給家用?
難得看到有意思的內容。
房子頭期160W + 210W(這部分是你自己出嗎?還是你跟你老公?還是你老公出)
這在嘉義、雲林、彰化一帶足夠貸款買新建3樓左右的透天厝。
若你是住在這些地方,你婆家也在附近。
你大伯跟小姑,領21K 24K,很常見。
你要慶幸你老公是職業軍人,薪水才比他們高。
萬一沒升上校/一等士官長沒有終身職奉....還被強制退伍,可能也會很慘。
建議早點發展民間第二專長
這裡沒有要戰學校,後段私校可以找到的好工作好薪水的本來就比較少
因為這個老闆都喊COSTDOWN的年代,薪水已經沒成長好幾年。
領這樣的薪水也無怪你大伯沒結婚,養自己都有點困難了,何況一家人。
以上都是閒聊。
重點:
1.你大伯啃老跟你無關,那是你婆婆甘願受歡喜愛
2.孝親費是看個人能力,跟公平無關,人家就沒工作你還要人家給錢,要逼死誰阿。
3.不要太計較了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.26.231.111
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/marriage/M.1409794372.A.F06.html
推
09/04 09:33, , 1F
09/04 09:33, 1F
→
09/04 09:34, , 2F
09/04 09:34, 2F
→
09/04 09:35, , 3F
09/04 09:35, 3F
推
09/04 09:36, , 4F
09/04 09:36, 4F
推
09/04 09:36, , 5F
09/04 09:36, 5F
→
09/04 09:38, , 6F
09/04 09:38, 6F
推
09/04 09:38, , 7F
09/04 09:38, 7F
→
09/04 09:39, , 8F
09/04 09:39, 8F
→
09/04 09:39, , 9F
09/04 09:39, 9F
→
09/04 09:39, , 10F
09/04 09:39, 10F
推
09/04 09:40, , 11F
09/04 09:40, 11F
→
09/04 09:40, , 12F
09/04 09:40, 12F
→
09/04 09:40, , 13F
09/04 09:40, 13F
→
09/04 09:41, , 14F
09/04 09:41, 14F
→
09/04 09:41, , 15F
09/04 09:41, 15F
→
09/04 09:42, , 16F
09/04 09:42, 16F
→
09/04 09:43, , 17F
09/04 09:43, 17F
→
09/04 09:43, , 18F
09/04 09:43, 18F
推
09/04 09:43, , 19F
09/04 09:43, 19F
→
09/04 09:43, , 20F
09/04 09:43, 20F
→
09/04 09:45, , 21F
09/04 09:45, 21F
→
09/04 09:45, , 22F
09/04 09:45, 22F
→
09/04 09:45, , 23F
09/04 09:45, 23F
推
09/04 09:49, , 24F
09/04 09:49, 24F
→
09/04 09:49, , 25F
09/04 09:49, 25F
→
09/04 09:50, , 26F
09/04 09:50, 26F
→
09/04 09:50, , 27F
09/04 09:50, 27F
推
09/04 09:50, , 28F
09/04 09:50, 28F
→
09/04 09:50, , 29F
09/04 09:50, 29F
→
09/04 09:51, , 30F
09/04 09:51, 30F
噓
09/04 09:51, , 31F
09/04 09:51, 31F
→
09/04 09:51, , 32F
09/04 09:51, 32F
→
09/04 09:51, , 33F
09/04 09:51, 33F
→
09/04 09:52, , 34F
09/04 09:52, 34F
→
09/04 09:52, , 35F
09/04 09:52, 35F
→
09/04 09:52, , 36F
09/04 09:52, 36F
推
09/04 09:52, , 37F
09/04 09:52, 37F
→
09/04 09:52, , 38F
09/04 09:52, 38F
→
09/04 09:53, , 39F
09/04 09:53, 39F
還有 106 則推文
還有 7 段內文
→
09/04 10:53, , 146F
09/04 10:53, 146F
推
09/04 10:53, , 147F
09/04 10:53, 147F
→
09/04 10:53, , 148F
09/04 10:53, 148F
→
09/04 10:53, , 149F
09/04 10:53, 149F
推
09/04 11:03, , 150F
09/04 11:03, 150F
推
09/04 11:09, , 151F
09/04 11:09, 151F
→
09/04 11:09, , 152F
09/04 11:09, 152F
→
09/04 11:09, , 153F
09/04 11:09, 153F
推
09/04 11:16, , 154F
09/04 11:16, 154F
推
09/04 11:20, , 155F
09/04 11:20, 155F
推
09/04 11:27, , 156F
09/04 11:27, 156F
→
09/04 11:27, , 157F
09/04 11:27, 157F
推
09/04 11:27, , 158F
09/04 11:27, 158F
→
09/04 11:28, , 159F
09/04 11:28, 159F
推
09/04 11:30, , 160F
09/04 11:30, 160F
推
09/04 11:31, , 161F
09/04 11:31, 161F
→
09/04 11:31, , 162F
09/04 11:31, 162F
推
09/04 11:35, , 163F
09/04 11:35, 163F
→
09/04 11:35, , 164F
09/04 11:35, 164F
推
09/04 11:47, , 165F
09/04 11:47, 165F
→
09/04 11:47, , 166F
09/04 11:47, 166F
→
09/04 11:48, , 167F
09/04 11:48, 167F
推
09/04 12:59, , 168F
09/04 12:59, 168F
推
09/04 13:41, , 169F
09/04 13:41, 169F
→
09/04 13:41, , 170F
09/04 13:41, 170F
推
09/04 14:08, , 171F
09/04 14:08, 171F
推
09/04 14:15, , 172F
09/04 14:15, 172F
→
09/04 15:17, , 173F
09/04 15:17, 173F
→
09/04 19:21, , 174F
09/04 19:21, 174F
→
09/04 19:21, , 175F
09/04 19:21, 175F
推
09/04 22:35, , 176F
09/04 22:35, 176F
→
09/04 22:36, , 177F
09/04 22:36, 177F
推
09/04 22:39, , 178F
09/04 22:39, 178F
推
09/04 22:41, , 179F
09/04 22:41, 179F
噓
09/04 23:28, , 180F
09/04 23:28, 180F
推
09/05 00:14, , 181F
09/05 00:14, 181F
→
09/05 03:08, , 182F
09/05 03:08, 182F
→
09/05 03:08, , 183F
09/05 03:08, 183F
推
09/05 16:34, , 184F
09/05 16:34, 184F
→
09/10 19:35, , 185F
09/10 19:35, 185F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 17 篇):
討論
50
185
討論
30
80
討論
3
19
討論
27
81
討論
8
10
討論
3
3
討論
1
11
討論
21
27
討論
3
3
討論
25
143