[情報] Apple認為TSMC與***的晶片只有2%電力差異

看板iOS作者 (發牢騷!)時間8年前 (2015/10/09 05:16), 8年前編輯推噓9(201117)
留言48則, 37人參與, 最新討論串1/5 (看更多)
原文請跳轉 http://www.macrumors.com/2015/10/08/apple-a9-chip-2-3-percent-difference/ 全文以及翻譯如下 翻譯有我個人加油添醋的語氣,不喜歡的話請看原文。 (其實看第一段就夠了) Over the past several days, a slew of battery tests on the iPhone 6s and the iPhone 6s Plus have revealed some performance differences between models that have an A9 chip manufactured by TSMC and those with an A9 chip created by Samsung. While variousbenchmarking and real world usage tests have shown differences of 6 percent to 22 percent, in favor of TSMC chips, Apple says that its own testing has shown battery life variations of only two to three percent. 在過去幾天,有大量兩種版本晶片製成的6s與6s plus的電力測試。 台積電與三星的A9晶片,在多方測試之下,有著6~22%的電力續航力差距。 但是蘋果認為,實際的差異只有2~3%而已。 In a statement given to TechCrunch, Apple says that it has done internal testing and gathered customer data to determine the performance difference between the two chips in the iPhones. 在一份給TechCrunch的聲明稿中,蘋果表示經過內部測試以及蒐集了消費者的資料。 兩種晶片的差異已經有了結果。 With the Apple-designed A9 chip in your iPhone 6s or iPhone 6s Plus, you are getting the most advanced smartphone chip in the world. Every chip we ship meets Apple's highest standards for providing incredible performance and deliver great battery life, regardless of iPhone 6s capacity, color, or model. Certain manufactured lab tests which run the processors with a continuous heavy workload until the battery depletes are not representative of real-world usage, since they spend an unrealistic amount of time at the highest CPU performance state. It's a misleading way to measure real-world battery life. Our testing and customer data show the actual battery life of the iPhone 6s and iPhone 6s Plus, even taking into account variable component differences, vary within just 2-3% of each other. 我們設計的A9晶片根本是科技的尖端,你拿到的是世界上最棒的手機。 無論你拿哪個型號或顏色,你都可以得到最棒的效能、卓越的電量、快樂的人生。 最近很多人在幫我們做不同製成晶片的電力測試,喔,拜託,誰會那樣測。 現實生活有誰會拿著手機24小時不斷的讓CPU滿載阿。根本一點也不現實。 在一般日常使用下,電力只會差2~3%啦。 Apple says that early battery benchmark tests conducted by customers, such as those weshared yesterday, are not reflective of real world usage conditions. The two to three percent difference that Apple has seen in data gathered from customers is "well within its manufacturing tolerances" and is a level of variation that could be seen between two devices with the same chip. Apple's statement on real world usage reflects what recent YouTube tests have revealed. Side-by-side battery tests comparing a TSMC iPhone and a Samsung iPhone did not show differences as dramatic as benchmark tests have shown, but those videos are also not quite indicative of real world usage results. On the MacRumors forums, opinions on battery life have been highly mixed. While some users with Samsung chips have reported poor battery life, others have not reported issues. 這兩段只是做總結,基本上跟前面說的差不多,懶得翻了。 總之,蘋果承認兩種晶片有差異,但認為這只是公差的正常值。 不要噓我QQ,我只是在等官網開賣無聊,轉貼新聞不是在護航。 -- 很多飲料店都用保麗龍杯子 飲料你只要20分鐘就可以喝完 但是留下的保麗龍杯子 地球500年都消化不完 如果你買了就直接喝 請不要又拿一個塑膠袋包著喝 夏天冷氣不用開這麼冷 每人冷氣每調高一度 就可以省6%的電力 一整個夏天可以省84億度的電 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.251.186.194 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1444338961.A.459.html ※ 編輯: mmmmmfff (111.251.186.194), 10/09/2015 05:16:53

10/09 05:18, , 1F
在我翻譯原文的時候原來有人po了
10/09 05:18, 1F

10/09 05:18, , 2F
但看在我辛苦翻譯的情況下 我可以不刪文嗎 QQ
10/09 05:18, 2F

10/09 05:23, , 3F
抱歉 因為愛睏 我只翻重點 XD
10/09 05:23, 3F

10/09 05:23, , 4F
你害我以為蘋果真的說「快樂的人生」...
10/09 05:23, 4F

10/09 05:30, , 5F
意思就是:「真的有差啊!一點點而已啦!」
10/09 05:30, 5F

10/09 05:30, , 6F
平常只用用line 上上網不會影響啦。 有tsmc版可換
10/09 05:30, 6F

10/09 05:30, , 7F
10/09 05:30, 7F

10/09 05:36, , 8F
感謝翻譯就是承認了為什麼要找魯蛇製造
10/09 05:36, 8F

10/09 05:46, , 9F
怒噓凌晨派對累得要死買到三星
10/09 05:46, 9F

10/09 05:48, , 10F
樓上拍拍
10/09 05:48, 10F

10/09 05:50, , 11F
不過至少其他功能完全正常,只能這樣安慰自己
10/09 05:50, 11F

10/09 05:51, , 12F
三星再鳥,應該續航還是屌打我之前的5时(阿Q心態)
10/09 05:51, 12F

10/09 05:52, , 13F
意思是低度使用不會有影響嗎?
10/09 05:52, 13F

10/09 06:03, , 14F
最棒的效能、卓越的電量、快樂的人生,還差考試都考100分
10/09 06:03, 14F

10/09 06:08, , 15F
但也不是每個人都不會重度使用,連續打game或看影片應該
10/09 06:08, 15F

10/09 06:08, , 16F
都有差吧!
10/09 06:08, 16F

10/09 06:12, , 17F
2%,可以省多少電了 ,如果一年賣出一億2千萬隻6s ...無聊
10/09 06:12, 17F

10/09 06:12, , 18F
算一下
10/09 06:12, 18F

10/09 06:15, , 19F
有差別還敢賣 賈柏斯都要從地底爬起來了
10/09 06:15, 19F

10/09 06:18, , 20F
就是不想拿到爽爽爽的不行?
10/09 06:18, 20F

10/09 06:19, , 21F
蘋果急了?
10/09 06:19, 21F

10/09 06:20, , 22F
看來蘋果規格應該是訂5%以內允收~哈
10/09 06:20, 22F

10/09 06:32, , 23F
辛苦翻譯上色
10/09 06:32, 23F

10/09 07:06, , 24F
蘋果當然要這樣說啦不意外 難道召回2000萬+臺三星嗎
10/09 07:06, 24F

10/09 07:19, , 25F
可以算一下用台積的CPU可以省幾度電嗎?
10/09 07:19, 25F

10/09 07:48, , 26F
要省電 關機不要用最省 兩種cpu一樣平等
10/09 07:48, 26F

10/09 08:04, , 27F
你玩遊戲上網不會full load?騙小孩嗎?
10/09 08:04, 27F

10/09 08:19, , 28F
就算蘋果這樣說,還是想要tsmc啊,還是有差
10/09 08:19, 28F

10/09 08:51, , 29F
這種聲明代表性能差異很大,不是三星差而是gg性能好太多
10/09 08:51, 29F

10/09 09:08, , 30F
無恥 廠商
10/09 09:08, 30F

10/09 09:13, , 31F
這樣不是直接打臉以前大部分的電力評測 手機不是這樣用
10/09 09:13, 31F

10/09 09:13, , 32F
低......
10/09 09:13, 32F

10/09 09:19, , 33F
10/09 09:19, 33F

10/09 09:22, , 34F
那抽到要不要退我2~3%的錢
10/09 09:22, 34F

10/09 09:26, , 35F
天線門的時候也沒承認,看起來是差很大啦..這樣搞.....
10/09 09:26, 35F

10/09 09:26, , 36F
已經賣這麼貴了..還要貪小便宜用三爽的晶片..
10/09 09:26, 36F

10/09 10:02, , 37F
這篇文反過來看就是承認高負載時會有明顯差異
10/09 10:02, 37F

10/09 10:03, , 38F
而且還有多餘廢熱的問題 三星的會變暖爐
10/09 10:03, 38F

10/09 10:10, , 39F
清者自清,會想要解釋就是明顯有差
10/09 10:10, 39F

10/09 12:09, , 40F
這就是蘋果官方正式承認cpu有差異,內部應該在研擬對
10/09 12:09, 40F

10/09 12:42, , 41F
推 簽名檔,愛地球 自備環保杯!
10/09 12:42, 41F

10/09 12:52, , 42F
台積電版 A9 續航力比三星多 2 小時!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
10/09 12:52, 42F

10/09 13:19, , 43F
三星去死
10/09 13:19, 43F

10/09 13:54, , 44F
混料還敢說那麼多 幹!!! 就是有差異啊 我爽跑MCU滿載不行
10/09 13:54, 44F

10/09 15:46, , 45F
快樂的人生 XDDD
10/09 15:46, 45F

10/09 17:09, , 46F
商人就是商人 出來滅火了 可惜大家還是要選TSMC
10/09 17:09, 46F

10/09 18:29, , 47F
狗屁 6的殼設計太薄容易凹死不承認 現在又有缺陷zzz
10/09 18:29, 47F

10/09 20:00, , 48F
誰相信= =?
10/09 20:00, 48F
文章代碼(AID): #1M5jqHHP (iOS)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1M5jqHHP (iOS)