Re: [情報] Apple認為TSMC與***的晶片只有2%電力差異
其實蘋果講的是對的
實際日常使用只會差 2~3%
會提這個數據表示他們有詳細的測試過了
因為 daily use 耗電的主因明明就是網路跟螢幕 智慧型手機通常都是這樣
要讓cpu一直保持全速運轉 才會差點20~25% 這種根本算是極端的worst case
實際上續航不會相差如此懸殊 所以蘋果才沒有重視這個問題
也就只有台灣人這麼無聊會想一直吵這個吧 本來就沒什麼大不了的事情
你要符合那些測試的結果 難道你打算手機拿來整天玩爐石或是跑分嗎
所以拿到三星版的a9 不需要覺得好像拿到次等品
其實差異不大的 謝謝
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.136.61.172
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1444366870.A.AD6.html
※ 編輯: Lenlien (223.136.61.172), 10/09/2015 13:01:41
推
10/09 13:02, , 1F
10/09 13:02, 1F
噓
10/09 13:02, , 2F
10/09 13:02, 2F
噓
10/09 13:02, , 3F
10/09 13:02, 3F
推
10/09 13:02, , 4F
10/09 13:02, 4F
→
10/09 13:02, , 5F
10/09 13:02, 5F
→
10/09 13:03, , 6F
10/09 13:03, 6F
推
10/09 13:03, , 7F
10/09 13:03, 7F
推
10/09 13:03, , 8F
10/09 13:03, 8F
噓
10/09 13:03, , 9F
10/09 13:03, 9F
→
10/09 13:03, , 10F
10/09 13:03, 10F
推
10/09 13:03, , 11F
10/09 13:03, 11F
噓
10/09 13:03, , 12F
10/09 13:03, 12F
→
10/09 13:03, , 13F
10/09 13:03, 13F
→
10/09 13:03, , 14F
10/09 13:03, 14F
→
10/09 13:03, , 15F
10/09 13:03, 15F
噓
10/09 13:03, , 16F
10/09 13:03, 16F
噓
10/09 13:04, , 17F
10/09 13:04, 17F
推
10/09 13:04, , 18F
10/09 13:04, 18F
噓
10/09 13:04, , 19F
10/09 13:04, 19F
→
10/09 13:04, , 20F
10/09 13:04, 20F
噓
10/09 13:05, , 21F
10/09 13:05, 21F
推
10/09 13:06, , 22F
10/09 13:06, 22F
推
10/09 13:07, , 23F
10/09 13:07, 23F
推
10/09 13:08, , 24F
10/09 13:08, 24F
→
10/09 13:08, , 25F
10/09 13:08, 25F
推
10/09 13:08, , 26F
10/09 13:08, 26F
噓
10/09 13:14, , 27F
10/09 13:14, 27F
→
10/09 13:14, , 28F
10/09 13:14, 28F
→
10/09 13:15, , 29F
10/09 13:15, 29F
噓
10/09 13:18, , 30F
10/09 13:18, 30F
噓
10/09 13:18, , 31F
10/09 13:18, 31F
噓
10/09 13:21, , 32F
10/09 13:21, 32F
噓
10/09 13:21, , 33F
10/09 13:21, 33F
噓
10/09 13:28, , 34F
10/09 13:28, 34F
噓
10/09 13:33, , 35F
10/09 13:33, 35F
噓
10/09 13:57, , 36F
10/09 13:57, 36F
→
10/09 13:57, , 37F
10/09 13:57, 37F
噓
10/09 13:59, , 38F
10/09 13:59, 38F
→
10/09 14:01, , 39F
10/09 14:01, 39F
→
10/09 14:05, , 40F
10/09 14:05, 40F
→
10/09 14:06, , 41F
10/09 14:06, 41F
噓
10/09 14:08, , 42F
10/09 14:08, 42F
→
10/09 14:09, , 43F
10/09 14:09, 43F
噓
10/09 14:13, , 44F
10/09 14:13, 44F
噓
10/09 14:23, , 45F
10/09 14:23, 45F
→
10/09 14:23, , 46F
10/09 14:23, 46F
噓
10/09 14:31, , 47F
10/09 14:31, 47F
→
10/09 14:36, , 48F
10/09 14:36, 48F
噓
10/09 14:53, , 49F
10/09 14:53, 49F
推
10/09 15:20, , 50F
10/09 15:20, 50F
噓
10/09 16:18, , 51F
10/09 16:18, 51F
→
10/09 16:18, , 52F
10/09 16:18, 52F
→
10/09 16:19, , 53F
10/09 16:19, 53F
→
10/09 16:51, , 54F
10/09 16:51, 54F
噓
10/09 19:33, , 55F
10/09 19:33, 55F
→
10/09 19:49, , 56F
10/09 19:49, 56F
噓
10/09 19:54, , 57F
10/09 19:54, 57F
噓
10/09 20:13, , 58F
10/09 20:13, 58F
→
10/09 20:15, , 59F
10/09 20:15, 59F
→
10/09 20:16, , 60F
10/09 20:16, 60F
噓
10/09 20:24, , 61F
10/09 20:24, 61F
噓
10/09 21:44, , 62F
10/09 21:44, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇):