Re: [討論] iphone6+ 1GRAM確定 你會因此改買6嗎?
看板iOS作者Frankaze (To be excellent!)時間11年前 (2014/09/23 18:29)推噓2(11推 9噓 40→)留言60則, 23人參與討論串14/15 (看更多)
看完回文的激烈的討論,有人認為蘋果記憶體管理很強,1G應該夠用,小弟突發奇想比較
一下。
在售價不變的情況下,如果IPhone 6 跟 6 plus 同時都推出以下兩種規格
1. A7 CPU + 2G Ram
2. A8 CPU + 1G Ram
大家會選擇買「規格1」或「規格2」?
CPU的價差應該 比Ram高,所以沒關係選「規格1」的消費者吃點小虧,很夠用應該都會買「
規格2」吧?
來個推文的民意調查吧,答案應該就會浮現出來了。
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 219.85.220.88
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1411468158.A.649.html
※ 編輯: Frankaze (219.85.220.88), 09/23/2014 18:32:24
→
09/23 18:33, , 1F
09/23 18:33, 1F
噓
09/23 18:33, , 2F
09/23 18:33, 2F
→
09/23 18:33, , 3F
09/23 18:33, 3F
推
09/23 18:33, , 4F
09/23 18:33, 4F
→
09/23 18:34, , 5F
09/23 18:34, 5F
→
09/23 18:34, , 6F
09/23 18:34, 6F
→
09/23 18:34, , 7F
09/23 18:34, 7F
→
09/23 18:35, , 8F
09/23 18:35, 8F
推
09/23 18:35, , 9F
09/23 18:35, 9F
推
09/23 18:36, , 10F
09/23 18:36, 10F
推
09/23 18:36, , 11F
09/23 18:36, 11F
→
09/23 18:36, , 12F
09/23 18:36, 12F
推
09/23 18:37, , 13F
09/23 18:37, 13F
噓
09/23 18:37, , 14F
09/23 18:37, 14F
→
09/23 18:38, , 15F
09/23 18:38, 15F
→
09/23 18:39, , 16F
09/23 18:39, 16F
噓
09/23 18:50, , 17F
09/23 18:50, 17F
推
09/23 19:01, , 18F
09/23 19:01, 18F
→
09/23 19:02, , 19F
09/23 19:02, 19F
→
09/23 19:02, , 20F
09/23 19:02, 20F
→
09/23 19:03, , 21F
09/23 19:03, 21F
→
09/23 19:04, , 22F
09/23 19:04, 22F
→
09/23 19:05, , 23F
09/23 19:05, 23F
→
09/23 19:05, , 24F
09/23 19:05, 24F
→
09/23 19:05, , 25F
09/23 19:05, 25F
推
09/23 19:08, , 26F
09/23 19:08, 26F
→
09/23 19:08, , 27F
09/23 19:08, 27F
噓
09/23 19:12, , 28F
09/23 19:12, 28F
→
09/23 19:13, , 29F
09/23 19:13, 29F
→
09/23 19:14, , 30F
09/23 19:14, 30F
噓
09/23 19:16, , 31F
09/23 19:16, 31F
推
09/23 19:21, , 32F
09/23 19:21, 32F
→
09/23 19:22, , 33F
09/23 19:22, 33F
→
09/23 19:23, , 34F
09/23 19:23, 34F
→
09/23 19:23, , 35F
09/23 19:23, 35F
→
09/23 19:23, , 36F
09/23 19:23, 36F
推
09/23 19:32, , 37F
09/23 19:32, 37F
→
09/23 19:34, , 38F
09/23 19:34, 38F
→
09/23 19:34, , 39F
09/23 19:34, 39F
→
09/23 19:34, , 40F
09/23 19:34, 40F
→
09/23 19:35, , 41F
09/23 19:35, 41F
→
09/23 19:35, , 42F
09/23 19:35, 42F
→
09/23 19:36, , 43F
09/23 19:36, 43F
→
09/23 19:37, , 44F
09/23 19:37, 44F
→
09/23 19:38, , 45F
09/23 19:38, 45F
→
09/23 19:38, , 46F
09/23 19:38, 46F
→
09/23 19:40, , 47F
09/23 19:40, 47F
→
09/23 19:41, , 48F
09/23 19:41, 48F
→
09/23 19:42, , 49F
09/23 19:42, 49F
推
09/23 19:45, , 50F
09/23 19:45, 50F
噓
09/23 19:52, , 51F
09/23 19:52, 51F
推
09/23 20:11, , 52F
09/23 20:11, 52F
→
09/23 20:11, , 53F
09/23 20:11, 53F
→
09/23 20:32, , 54F
09/23 20:32, 54F
→
09/23 20:38, , 55F
09/23 20:38, 55F
→
09/23 20:41, , 56F
09/23 20:41, 56F
噓
09/23 21:38, , 57F
09/23 21:38, 57F
噓
09/23 21:46, , 58F
09/23 21:46, 58F
噓
09/23 22:13, , 59F
09/23 22:13, 59F
→
09/24 15:49, , 60F
09/24 15:49, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 14 之 15 篇):