[情報] 2019自駕報告：豐田跳脫率比百度高270倍

看板car作者Scape (缺鈣缺很大)時間6年前 (2020/02/28 08:48)推噓15(15推 0噓 15→)

留言30則, 18人參與討論串1/2 (看更多)

來源： http://bit.ly/2VsBFHv Toyota has the highest degree of self-driving cars, 27,000% more than Baidu's Apollo Toyota 的無人駕駛車輛有著最高的跳脫率，比起百度的Apollo 高出270倍 Baidu's open source Apollo self-driving car platform is the king of 2019 with a minimum separation distance per mile. 百度的Apollo 開源無人駕駛測試車在2019年稱王，有著最小的跳脫率。 Baidu One of the things that makes California unique in the development of autonomous vehicles is that it requires developers to submit some Disengagement report Per year. 百度對於無人駕駛車輛測試來說，每年要求提供無人駕駛脫離報告是加州的一項與眾不同之處。 This disengagement report-don't confuse with DC's outstanding performance Dismemberment plan -Is a detailed log of human safety drivers being forced to control self-driving cars under any circumstances during tests on public roads, and the circumstances that caused this. This is one of the best indicators of the public's understanding of how advanced a given company's self-driving car program is. 這份脫離接觸報告詳細記錄了人類安全駕駛員被迫接管無人駕駛車輛的狀況。這是大眾了解特定公司的無人駕駛車輛計劃有多先進的最好指標之一。 in the past few years, Waymo Usually, it is dominated by the least disengagement per mile, but it looks like Chinese Baidu, And Open source Apollo The self-driving car platform went away and pulled Jon Snow from a relative in Denvers Targaryen, Mountain View. 過去幾年，Waymo 保持著每英里跳脫率最少的紀錄，但今年來自中國的百度其 Apollo 開源無人駕駛車平台其表現著實讓我們眼前一亮。 Specifically, Baidu achieved a staggering 0.06 departures per thousand miles driven, and its four development vehicles traveled a total of 100,300.2 miles in 2019. All its disengagements (only six times in total) occurred on ground streets, not on highways or freeways. This is a common theme for most reporting companies. 具體來說，2019年百度Apollo 平台實現了每一千英里里程只有0.06次的驚人跳脫率，該公司的四輛開發測試車總共行駛了100300.2 英里。所有的(只有六次) 的跳脫狀況都是在地面街道上發生，而不是在高速公路或快速道路上。這也是大多數公司所報告的普遍現象。 Waymo and Cruise are tied for second. Their clutch per 1,000 miles is only 0.08. For brevity, we will call them Wallys from now on. Baidu. Cruise has 227 cars on the road and travels 831,039.9 miles. Waymo only conducted 147 car tests, but In a typical Waymo wayThey did go a long way-exactly 1,453,137.3. This is equivalent to three round trips to the moon. Waymo 與Cruise 則是並列第二。他們的每千英里跳脫率只有0.08次。Cruise 共有227輛測試車並且共跑了831039.9 英里。Waymo 有147輛測試車，但Waymo 的總測試里程數更多，有1453137.3英里，相當於可以往返月球三次。 How have these numbers improved since 2018? Facts have proven to be significant. Best of Waymo-and best of all reports Submitted to 2018 -It's 0.09 Wallis. Baidu's 0.06 is a very serious bump, and even Cruise and Waymo's own 0.01 Wally decline should not be underestimated. 那這些數據自從2018年後改善了多少？在2018年時，Waymo 最好(也是所有公司中最好)的跳脫率是0.09。百度今年的0.06跳脫率是一個非常大的衝擊，甚至Cruise 與Waymo 的0.01次的降幅也不可小看。 So now we have seen the best. Which major companies are underperforming in producing self-driving cars? Well, unfortunately, the top three of this year are all traditional car manufacturers. Mercedes Benz It was the worst one, with 140 of them coming from 18 cars and driving 14,238 miles. 前幾名看過了。那哪些大公司在研發無人駕駛車輛時表現不佳？不幸的是，今年的倒數三名都是傳統汽車製造商。Benz 是其中之一，他們的18輛無人駕駛測試車一共行駛了行駛了14238英里，跳脫率高達140次/千英里。 The second worst is the Munich people-I mean BMW, of course -Scored 370 Wallys. This was produced by five cars that only traveled 21.36 miles. Maybe if they pay more, the results will improve, but we have to see how they perform in 2020. 第二糟的是BMW，跳脫率是370次/千英里。他們只有五輛車共行駛了21.36英里。 Finally, at the bottom of the proverbial bucket is Toyota cars the study. Its researchers managed a staggering 1,620 of Wally among six cars traveling only 1,817 miles. Especially one car-VIN number JTHDU1EF3G5020098, which was a liar-completed an amazing 900 breaks on its own in just 534 test miles. 最後，至於備受關注的Toyota，該公司用6輛測試車行駛了1817英里，但卻給出了跳脫率1620次/千英里的墊底成績。特別是一輛VIN 為JTHDU1EF3G5020098 的測試車，竟然在短短534英里的測試里程中，跳脫了驚人的900次。 It's easy to joke now, but the truth is that developing self-driving cars is unusual, crazy, incredible, very, very difficult. Toyota hasn't done this in a while, and although it obviously has a way to go, we implore it: Toyota's self-driving cars plan to underperform in 2019, but there will always be next year! Oh if you are curious Tesla That's all, rest assured, Elon & company submitted a disengagement report. The Big T has zero detachment (yes, zero), but it's important to note that it is only equipped with one car, and the car only travels 12.2 miles. So yes, fully autonomous driving is Imminent, you guys. ===================================================================== 加州車輛管理局(DMV) 每年都會要求在該州測試無人駕駛車輛的公司提供數據，其中平均每一千英里需要人工接管幾次的跳脫率一直倍受關注。過去一直都是Waymo 領先，而且領先幅度不小。另外一家新創公司Cruise 成績通常也不錯，然後前幾年就被GM 收購了，所以GM 一直對他們的自駕技術很有自信。在加州測試的公司還有一大堆，除了像是Apple、Tesla 這些美國本土公司外，來自中國的公司也非常的多，2019年的DMV 無人駕駛報告裡前十名有快半是中國公司： https://i.imgur.com/Oh5Ykf6.png

另外有趣的是，不曉得是不是因為脫離率被百度追上，Waymo 在這報告發佈不久後就寫了推特，說脫離率並不能夠代表各公司實際的研發狀況好壞。 ╭───────────────────────────────╮ │https://twitter.com/Waymo/status/1232758355082375168 │ │ │ │Waymo │ │ │ │1/7 We appreciate what the California DMV was trying to do │ │when creating this requirement, but the disengagement metric │ │does not provide relevant insights into the capabilities of │ │the Waymo Driver or distinguish its performance from others │ │in the self-driving space. │ ╰───────────────────────────────╯ 不過Waymo 會這樣說是正確的，因為這份報告是由各公司自己提供，其實際狀況可能會不一樣，或許有些公司選擇的路線比較簡單、或許有別的因素，簡單的說就是測試的基準並不相同。 DMV 報告連結： http://bit.ly/32zsert -- https://i.imgur.com/xHFddLR.jpg

-- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.224.210.62 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1582850909.A.F76.html

→

ghjkl5566

02/28 09:23, 6年前 , 1^F

02/28 09:23, 1^F

→

ghjkl5566

02/28 09:24, 6年前 , 2^F

02/28 09:24, 2^F

推

lucky945

02/28 09:30, 6年前 , 3^F

02/28 09:30, 3^F

推

bluemkevin

02/28 09:56, 6年前 , 4^F

02/28 09:56, 4^F

→

arcross

02/28 09:57, 6年前 , 5^F

02/28 09:57, 5^F

→

arcross

02/28 09:57, 6年前 , 6^F

02/28 09:57, 6^F

推

awayaway

02/28 09:58, 6年前 , 7^F

02/28 09:58, 7^F

→

awayaway

02/28 09:59, 6年前 , 8^F

02/28 09:59, 8^F

推

bluemkevin

02/28 09:59, 6年前 , 9^F

02/28 09:59, 9^F

→

bluemkevin

02/28 10:00, 6年前 , 10^F

02/28 10:00, 10^F

推

G8man

02/28 10:04, 6年前 , 11^F

02/28 10:04, 11^F

無人駕駛車行駛每一千英里需要人工接管的次數 ※ 編輯: Scape (36.224.210.62 臺灣), 02/28/2020 10:08:09

推

bcs

02/28 10:07, 6年前 , 12^F

02/28 10:07, 12^F

→

bcs

02/28 10:07, 6年前 , 13^F

02/28 10:07, 13^F

→

d8613518

02/28 10:18, 6年前 , 14^F

02/28 10:18, 14^F

推

yytseng

02/28 10:34, 6年前 , 15^F

02/28 10:34, 15^F

推

hiphoprover

02/28 10:41, 6年前 , 16^F

02/28 10:41, 16^F

推

kenation

02/28 11:13, 6年前 , 17^F

02/28 11:13, 17^F

→

kenation

02/28 11:13, 6年前 , 18^F

02/28 11:13, 18^F

不要誤會啦 XD 這篇報告的測試車輛本來就是在測"無人駕駛"車也就是Lv4、Lv5 的系統，各家公司一邊測試一邊研發所以本來就是要給人去睡覺吃便當用的 ※ 編輯: Scape (36.224.210.62 臺灣), 02/28/2020 11:16:48

推

thid5335

02/28 11:19, 6年前 , 19^F

02/28 11:19, 19^F

→

thid5335

02/28 11:19, 6年前 , 20^F

02/28 11:19, 20^F

Tesla 雖然零跳脫但是只有12.2 miles 樣本太少了並且Tesla 的測試研發方法不太一樣他們會用陰影模式去做測試也就是在車輛正常行駛的時候電腦在背景模擬駕駛所以幾乎沒有現實的行駛里程他們去年一整年2018年提交的里程數甚至是零我甚至懷疑這12.2 miles 是他們去年拍影片時的里程有這陰影模式其實全世界都是他的駕駛訓練場 ※ 編輯: Scape (36.224.210.62 臺灣), 02/28/2020 11:27:31

→

DYE

02/28 11:59, 6年前 , 21^F

02/28 11:59, 21^F

→

DYE

02/28 12:00, 6年前 , 22^F

02/28 12:00, 22^F

→

bluemkevin

02/28 12:03, 6年前 , 23^F

02/28 12:03, 23^F