[討論] 為何米漿業務很愛說歪L渦輪引擎是他們做
之前就聽過很多人說BMW業務都說歪L的200t引擎跟BMW同一顆,今天又在網路上看到一個B
MW業務這樣說
但是8AR-FTS引擎就是豐田自己搞出來的,本體跟Camry 2.0的6AR-FSE完全一樣,差別只
是多了渦輪跟更強大的散熱冷卻系統,跟N20更是完全不同。
到底BMW的業務這樣說的意義是什麼?按照邏輯來說不是應該是Lexus業務或者車迷說這顆
引擎是BMW的然後由BMW 業務和車迷來消毒嗎?怎麼事實卻相反?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my iPhone
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.169.120.208
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1482849763.A.BC3.html
推
12/27 22:46, , 1F
12/27 22:46, 1F
→
12/27 22:46, , 2F
12/27 22:46, 2F
→
12/27 22:48, , 3F
12/27 22:48, 3F
推
12/27 22:48, , 4F
12/27 22:48, 4F
推
12/27 22:49, , 5F
12/27 22:49, 5F
噓
12/27 22:49, , 6F
12/27 22:49, 6F
就是因為這樣所以才覺得奇怪啊,明明效能差那麼多卻愛這樣講
※ 編輯: jason0330 (118.169.120.208), 12/27/2016 22:50:26
推
12/27 22:50, , 7F
12/27 22:50, 7F
推
12/27 22:50, , 8F
12/27 22:50, 8F
→
12/27 22:50, , 9F
12/27 22:50, 9F
→
12/27 22:51, , 10F
12/27 22:51, 10F
※ 編輯: jason0330 (118.169.120.208), 12/27/2016 22:52:32
推
12/27 22:51, , 11F
12/27 22:51, 11F
→
12/27 22:51, , 12F
12/27 22:51, 12F
→
12/27 22:53, , 13F
12/27 22:53, 13F
→
12/27 22:53, , 14F
12/27 22:53, 14F
→
12/27 22:54, , 15F
12/27 22:54, 15F
→
12/27 22:55, , 16F
12/27 22:55, 16F
推
12/27 22:56, , 17F
12/27 22:56, 17F
→
12/27 22:57, , 18F
12/27 22:57, 18F
推
12/27 22:57, , 19F
12/27 22:57, 19F
→
12/27 22:58, , 20F
12/27 22:58, 20F
問題在於IS200t的數據是330i等級結果性能只有320i水準
※ 編輯: jason0330 (118.169.120.208), 12/27/2016 22:59:34
→
12/27 22:58, , 21F
12/27 22:58, 21F
→
12/27 22:58, , 22F
12/27 22:58, 22F
→
12/27 22:59, , 23F
12/27 22:59, 23F
→
12/27 22:59, , 24F
12/27 22:59, 24F
推
12/27 22:59, , 25F
12/27 22:59, 25F
→
12/27 23:00, , 26F
12/27 23:00, 26F
530i一樣245/35.7,1620kg,但是只要6.2秒
※ 編輯: jason0330 (118.169.120.208), 12/27/2016 23:04:36
→
12/27 23:03, , 27F
12/27 23:03, 27F
→
12/27 23:04, , 28F
12/27 23:04, 28F
推
12/27 23:04, , 29F
12/27 23:04, 29F
沒錯,但老實說這顆引擎的推出性能從來就不是重點
※ 編輯: jason0330 (118.169.120.208), 12/27/2016 23:05:36
→
12/27 23:06, , 30F
12/27 23:06, 30F
推
12/27 23:08, , 31F
12/27 23:08, 31F
推
12/27 23:08, , 32F
12/27 23:08, 32F
推
12/27 23:09, , 33F
12/27 23:09, 33F
→
12/27 23:09, , 34F
12/27 23:09, 34F
還有 46 則推文
還有 3 段內文
推
12/28 09:50, , 81F
12/28 09:50, 81F
推
12/28 09:56, , 82F
12/28 09:56, 82F
→
12/28 09:56, , 83F
12/28 09:56, 83F
推
12/28 10:00, , 84F
12/28 10:00, 84F
推
12/28 10:14, , 85F
12/28 10:14, 85F
推
12/28 10:27, , 86F
12/28 10:27, 86F
→
12/28 10:27, , 87F
12/28 10:27, 87F
→
12/28 10:29, , 88F
12/28 10:29, 88F
→
12/28 10:30, , 89F
12/28 10:30, 89F
→
12/28 10:30, , 90F
12/28 10:30, 90F
推
12/28 10:39, , 91F
12/28 10:39, 91F
→
12/28 10:41, , 92F
12/28 10:41, 92F
推
12/28 11:16, , 93F
12/28 11:16, 93F
→
12/28 11:16, , 94F
12/28 11:16, 94F
推
12/28 11:18, , 95F
12/28 11:18, 95F
推
12/28 11:22, , 96F
12/28 11:22, 96F
推
12/28 11:23, , 97F
12/28 11:23, 97F
推
12/28 11:26, , 98F
12/28 11:26, 98F
→
12/28 11:26, , 99F
12/28 11:26, 99F
→
12/28 11:26, , 100F
12/28 11:26, 100F
→
12/28 11:27, , 101F
12/28 11:27, 101F
→
12/28 11:28, , 102F
12/28 11:28, 102F
推
12/28 11:28, , 103F
12/28 11:28, 103F
推
12/28 11:30, , 104F
12/28 11:30, 104F
推
12/28 11:33, , 105F
12/28 11:33, 105F
推
12/28 12:17, , 106F
12/28 12:17, 106F
推
12/28 15:54, , 107F
12/28 15:54, 107F
→
12/28 15:55, , 108F
12/28 15:55, 108F
→
12/28 15:58, , 109F
12/28 15:58, 109F
→
12/28 15:59, , 110F
12/28 15:59, 110F
推
12/28 16:53, , 111F
12/28 16:53, 111F
→
12/28 16:53, , 112F
12/28 16:53, 112F
→
12/28 16:53, , 113F
12/28 16:53, 113F
→
12/28 16:53, , 114F
12/28 16:53, 114F
→
12/28 18:02, , 115F
12/28 18:02, 115F
→
12/28 20:45, , 116F
12/28 20:45, 116F
推
12/28 23:01, , 117F
12/28 23:01, 117F
噓
12/29 17:54, , 118F
12/29 17:54, 118F
噓
12/29 17:58, , 119F
12/29 17:58, 119F
→
12/29 17:59, , 120F
12/29 17:59, 120F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):