[討論] 性能(Q30)與省油(CT200) 難抉擇啊!
我最近要買車,因為都一個人通勤所以買小台的就好
目前看上這兩台:
Lexus CT200h和最近討論度極熱的 Infiniti Q30
1. Lexus CT200h
http://i.imgur.com/RE1rLT7.png
會看上CT200h主要是因為它很省油,市區油耗很輕易就可以破20km/l
油錢對通勤族來說是一筆很大的開銷啊~
還有油電車很安靜,而且Lexus隔音都做得不錯
但是就配備來說,CT200h要買到199萬的頂級Navi款才有比較好的音響
而且還是只有17吋輪圈。動力的話也比較不夠,綜效馬力只有136HP
不過開油電車就是要省油,性能當然就比較不好了
2. Infiniti Q30
http://i.imgur.com/EZlqlNb.png
最近才推出的新車,會吸引我除了外觀非常流線動感之外,
重點是他是Mercedes Benz A系列的雙生車!引擎變速箱跟底盤都是賓士等級,
而且買到2.0t頂級款有19吋輪圈與跑車化懸吊+BOSE音響系統,售價還比CT200h便宜20萬
馬力更是高達211PS!配上七速雙離合器變速箱,0-100km/h只要7.2秒
雖然說每天通勤,但下班或者假日也會想小跑一下
畢竟男人嘛…偶而還是會想熱血的!
究竟要省油開CT200h還是要滿足對性能的渴望開Q30?
請各位給點意見吧!謝謝!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.204.151.196
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1468570970.A.397.html
推
07/15 16:24, , 1F
07/15 16:24, 1F
推
07/15 16:24, , 2F
07/15 16:24, 2F
推
07/15 16:24, , 3F
07/15 16:24, 3F
→
07/15 16:26, , 4F
07/15 16:26, 4F
推
07/15 16:26, , 5F
07/15 16:26, 5F
推
07/15 16:26, , 6F
07/15 16:26, 6F
→
07/15 16:27, , 7F
07/15 16:27, 7F
推
07/15 16:29, , 8F
07/15 16:29, 8F
→
07/15 16:29, , 9F
07/15 16:29, 9F
推
07/15 16:29, , 10F
07/15 16:29, 10F
→
07/15 16:30, , 11F
07/15 16:30, 11F
推
07/15 16:31, , 12F
07/15 16:31, 12F
→
07/15 16:31, , 13F
07/15 16:31, 13F
推
07/15 16:31, , 14F
07/15 16:31, 14F
推
07/15 16:32, , 15F
07/15 16:32, 15F
→
07/15 16:32, , 16F
07/15 16:32, 16F
→
07/15 16:32, , 17F
07/15 16:32, 17F
推
07/15 16:35, , 18F
07/15 16:35, 18F
推
07/15 16:36, , 19F
07/15 16:36, 19F
推
07/15 16:37, , 20F
07/15 16:37, 20F
推
07/15 16:42, , 21F
07/15 16:42, 21F
推
07/15 16:43, , 22F
07/15 16:43, 22F
→
07/15 16:46, , 23F
07/15 16:46, 23F
推
07/15 16:47, , 24F
07/15 16:47, 24F
推
07/15 16:48, , 25F
07/15 16:48, 25F
推
07/15 16:48, , 26F
07/15 16:48, 26F
推
07/15 16:49, , 27F
07/15 16:49, 27F
推
07/15 16:49, , 28F
07/15 16:49, 28F
推
07/15 16:49, , 29F
07/15 16:49, 29F
推
07/15 16:52, , 30F
07/15 16:52, 30F
推
07/15 16:52, , 31F
07/15 16:52, 31F
推
07/15 16:54, , 32F
07/15 16:54, 32F
→
07/15 16:54, , 33F
07/15 16:54, 33F
推
07/15 16:55, , 34F
07/15 16:55, 34F
推
07/15 16:56, , 35F
07/15 16:56, 35F
→
07/15 16:56, , 36F
07/15 16:56, 36F
→
07/15 16:56, , 37F
07/15 16:56, 37F
推
07/15 16:56, , 38F
07/15 16:56, 38F
推
07/15 17:01, , 39F
07/15 17:01, 39F
還有 98 則推文
→
07/15 22:31, , 138F
07/15 22:31, 138F
推
07/15 22:42, , 139F
07/15 22:42, 139F
推
07/15 23:08, , 140F
07/15 23:08, 140F
推
07/15 23:29, , 141F
07/15 23:29, 141F
→
07/15 23:31, , 142F
07/15 23:31, 142F
→
07/15 23:34, , 143F
07/15 23:34, 143F
→
07/15 23:47, , 144F
07/15 23:47, 144F
推
07/15 23:49, , 145F
07/15 23:49, 145F
→
07/15 23:49, , 146F
07/15 23:49, 146F
推
07/15 23:55, , 147F
07/15 23:55, 147F
→
07/15 23:55, , 148F
07/15 23:55, 148F
→
07/15 23:55, , 149F
07/15 23:55, 149F
推
07/16 00:17, , 150F
07/16 00:17, 150F
推
07/16 00:40, , 151F
07/16 00:40, 151F
→
07/16 00:40, , 152F
07/16 00:40, 152F
推
07/16 01:56, , 153F
07/16 01:56, 153F
推
07/16 02:55, , 154F
07/16 02:55, 154F
推
07/16 09:06, , 155F
07/16 09:06, 155F
→
07/16 09:26, , 156F
07/16 09:26, 156F
→
07/16 09:27, , 157F
07/16 09:27, 157F
推
07/16 10:08, , 158F
07/16 10:08, 158F
推
07/16 10:21, , 159F
07/16 10:21, 159F
推
07/16 12:45, , 160F
07/16 12:45, 160F
推
07/16 13:46, , 161F
07/16 13:46, 161F
推
07/16 14:11, , 162F
07/16 14:11, 162F
推
07/16 14:16, , 163F
07/16 14:16, 163F
推
07/16 14:24, , 164F
07/16 14:24, 164F
推
07/16 14:25, , 165F
07/16 14:25, 165F
→
07/16 14:43, , 166F
07/16 14:43, 166F
推
07/17 11:35, , 167F
07/17 11:35, 167F
推
07/18 11:15, , 168F
07/18 11:15, 168F
→
07/18 11:16, , 169F
07/18 11:16, 169F
→
07/18 11:17, , 170F
07/18 11:17, 170F
→
07/18 11:17, , 171F
07/18 11:17, 171F
推
07/22 15:20, , 172F
07/22 15:20, 172F
推
07/24 21:16, , 173F
07/24 21:16, 173F
→
07/24 21:16, , 174F
07/24 21:16, 174F
推
08/17 19:49, , 175F
08/17 19:49, 175F
推
08/17 19:52, , 176F
08/17 19:52, 176F
推
08/26 01:47, , 177F
08/26 01:47, 177F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):