Re: [問題] 該組車 還是買成車?
※ 引述《ryantae (榮仔)》之銘言:
: 目前朋友有一隻舊的caad 10的車架 我是想說直上ultegra 6800套件 總花費約在3萬3左
: 右
: 但是 我看到2015 HASA R1 的黑紅圖裝 金尬意 然後又是碳車 花費約4萬5
: 想請問 高階鋁車跟低階碳車大家會如何選擇呢?
這兩個根本沒什麼好比的, caad10算是很有口碑的,
簡單分析如下, 當一個1150g的鋁車架 vs 950g的碳車架, 要考慮幾件事,
1. 高階鋁車架是否在設計上能把材質可能的負面影響(重量, 路感)降到最低?
我想這部分根本不用去質疑cannondale
2. 低階碳車因為材料(成本)限制造成重量, 路感的變異?
Hasa這部分我就持保留的態度.
話說回來, 當一個1150g的鋁車架 vs 950g的碳車架
以距離封頂重量來說, 我想950g的碳車架是討不到什麼便宜的.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 124.219.57.129
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/bicycle/M.1412745283.A.110.html
推
10/08 13:19, , 1F
10/08 13:19, 1F
推
10/08 13:19, , 2F
10/08 13:19, 2F
推
10/08 14:32, , 3F
10/08 14:32, 3F
→
10/08 14:52, , 4F
10/08 14:52, 4F
推
10/08 15:06, , 5F
10/08 15:06, 5F
→
10/08 15:06, , 6F
10/08 15:06, 6F
推
10/08 15:47, , 7F
10/08 15:47, 7F
推
10/08 20:37, , 8F
10/08 20:37, 8F
→
10/08 20:56, , 9F
10/08 20:56, 9F
→
10/08 20:57, , 10F
10/08 20:57, 10F
推
10/08 20:59, , 11F
10/08 20:59, 11F
→
10/08 21:00, , 12F
10/08 21:00, 12F
→
10/08 21:03, , 13F
10/08 21:03, 13F
→
10/08 21:03, , 14F
10/08 21:03, 14F
推
10/08 21:51, , 15F
10/08 21:51, 15F
→
10/08 23:32, , 16F
10/08 23:32, 16F
推
10/09 00:46, , 17F
10/09 00:46, 17F
推
10/09 01:00, , 18F
10/09 01:00, 18F
推
10/09 01:21, , 19F
10/09 01:21, 19F
推
10/09 06:43, , 20F
10/09 06:43, 20F
推
10/09 08:48, , 21F
10/09 08:48, 21F
→
10/09 09:27, , 22F
10/09 09:27, 22F
→
10/09 09:32, , 23F
10/09 09:32, 23F
→
10/09 09:33, , 24F
10/09 09:33, 24F
推
10/09 10:45, , 25F
10/09 10:45, 25F
→
10/09 12:19, , 26F
10/09 12:19, 26F
推
10/09 12:30, , 27F
10/09 12:30, 27F
推
10/09 12:37, , 28F
10/09 12:37, 28F
→
10/09 12:37, , 29F
10/09 12:37, 29F
推
10/09 12:50, , 30F
10/09 12:50, 30F
推
10/09 13:25, , 31F
10/09 13:25, 31F
→
10/09 13:27, , 32F
10/09 13:27, 32F
→
10/09 13:31, , 33F
10/09 13:31, 33F
推
10/09 13:44, , 34F
10/09 13:44, 34F
推
10/09 14:32, , 35F
10/09 14:32, 35F
→
10/09 14:33, , 36F
10/09 14:33, 36F
推
10/09 14:34, , 37F
10/09 14:34, 37F
→
10/09 14:37, , 38F
10/09 14:37, 38F
→
10/09 14:37, , 39F
10/09 14:37, 39F
推
10/09 14:48, , 40F
10/09 14:48, 40F
→
10/09 14:49, , 41F
10/09 14:49, 41F
→
10/09 14:50, , 42F
10/09 14:50, 42F
→
10/09 14:51, , 43F
10/09 14:51, 43F
→
10/09 14:52, , 44F
10/09 14:52, 44F
→
10/09 14:52, , 45F
10/09 14:52, 45F
→
10/09 14:52, , 46F
10/09 14:52, 46F
→
10/09 14:53, , 47F
10/09 14:53, 47F
→
10/09 14:55, , 48F
10/09 14:55, 48F
推
10/09 15:40, , 49F
10/09 15:40, 49F
→
10/09 15:44, , 50F
10/09 15:44, 50F
推
10/09 16:33, , 51F
10/09 16:33, 51F
→
10/09 16:35, , 52F
10/09 16:35, 52F
推
10/09 16:50, , 53F
10/09 16:50, 53F
→
10/09 16:50, , 54F
10/09 16:50, 54F
推
10/09 17:25, , 55F
10/09 17:25, 55F
推
10/09 17:37, , 56F
10/09 17:37, 56F
→
10/09 17:58, , 57F
10/09 17:58, 57F
推
10/09 18:12, , 58F
10/09 18:12, 58F
→
10/09 18:12, , 59F
10/09 18:12, 59F
推
10/09 18:13, , 60F
10/09 18:13, 60F
→
10/09 18:13, , 61F
10/09 18:13, 61F
推
10/09 18:16, , 62F
10/09 18:16, 62F
→
10/09 18:16, , 63F
10/09 18:16, 63F
推
10/09 18:30, , 64F
10/09 18:30, 64F
推
10/09 18:31, , 65F
10/09 18:31, 65F
→
10/09 18:31, , 66F
10/09 18:31, 66F
推
10/09 18:34, , 67F
10/09 18:34, 67F
推
10/09 18:38, , 68F
10/09 18:38, 68F
推
10/09 18:46, , 69F
10/09 18:46, 69F
→
10/09 20:20, , 70F
10/09 20:20, 70F
推
10/09 21:09, , 71F
10/09 21:09, 71F
推
10/09 22:06, , 72F
10/09 22:06, 72F
推
10/10 00:11, , 73F
10/10 00:11, 73F
推
10/10 00:21, , 74F
10/10 00:21, 74F
推
10/10 04:05, , 75F
10/10 04:05, 75F
推
10/10 08:59, , 76F
10/10 08:59, 76F
推
10/10 15:41, , 77F
10/10 15:41, 77F
推
10/18 22:25, , 78F
10/18 22:25, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)