[閒聊] 若你是軍公教老一輩的既得利益者會反KMT嗎?已回收
剛好看到上面有一篇男友爸想說服發文者的文章想到,
我猜應該有不少老一輩的軍公教會希望藍當選和他們本身既得利益有關吧?
雖然我是不喜歡KMT和馬,
但有時候會覺得似乎也不能怪那些軍公教?
畢竟如果我就是既得利益者,
或許也有可能會擔心本來會有的利益不見。
畢竟錢雖然不是萬能,但有些人還是會希望多多益善吧?
不過因為我本身不是公務員,也不是老一輩的,
家中也沒有成員和這些既得利益相關,
所以我也不是很確定如果我真的是既得利益者,會做怎樣的選擇。
大家如果是那些既得利益者,覺得自己會做怎樣的選擇呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.160.54.114
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1452786805.A.CF8.html
推
01/14 23:54, , 1F
01/14 23:54, 1F
→
01/14 23:55, , 2F
01/14 23:55, 2F
推
01/14 23:55, , 3F
01/14 23:55, 3F
推
01/14 23:55, , 4F
01/14 23:55, 4F
推
01/14 23:56, , 5F
01/14 23:56, 5F
→
01/14 23:57, , 6F
01/14 23:57, 6F
→
01/14 23:57, , 7F
01/14 23:57, 7F
推
01/14 23:57, , 8F
01/14 23:57, 8F
推
01/14 23:58, , 9F
01/14 23:58, 9F
→
01/14 23:58, , 10F
01/14 23:58, 10F
推
01/14 23:58, , 11F
01/14 23:58, 11F
推
01/14 23:59, , 12F
01/14 23:59, 12F
推
01/14 23:59, , 13F
01/14 23:59, 13F
推
01/14 23:59, , 14F
01/14 23:59, 14F
→
01/14 23:59, , 15F
01/14 23:59, 15F
→
01/15 00:00, , 16F
01/15 00:00, 16F
→
01/15 00:00, , 17F
01/15 00:00, 17F
→
01/15 00:01, , 18F
01/15 00:01, 18F
仔細想想,如果是我,或許會衡量自己現有的財富能力和後代目前能力來做考量吧?
不過沒有實際經驗,實在也不確定會怎樣做。
→
01/15 00:01, , 19F
01/15 00:01, 19F
→
01/15 00:02, , 20F
01/15 00:02, 20F
→
01/15 00:02, , 21F
01/15 00:02, 21F
→
01/15 00:02, , 22F
01/15 00:02, 22F
噓
01/15 00:02, , 23F
01/15 00:02, 23F
推
01/15 00:03, , 24F
01/15 00:03, 24F
我的意思是軍公教裡頭一部分的既得利益者(就是指有拿18趴之類的那群)
造成誤會抱歉,已在標題加上老人。
我有朋友是年輕公務員,我知道他們現在也很辛苦。
推
01/15 00:03, , 25F
01/15 00:03, 25F
→
01/15 00:03, , 26F
01/15 00:03, 26F
→
01/15 00:03, , 27F
01/15 00:03, 27F
推
01/15 00:04, , 28F
01/15 00:04, 28F
→
01/15 00:05, , 29F
01/15 00:05, 29F
→
01/15 00:05, , 30F
01/15 00:05, 30F
→
01/15 00:05, , 31F
01/15 00:05, 31F
→
01/15 00:05, , 32F
01/15 00:05, 32F
→
01/15 00:06, , 33F
01/15 00:06, 33F
→
01/15 00:06, , 34F
01/15 00:06, 34F
→
01/15 00:06, , 35F
01/15 00:06, 35F
→
01/15 00:07, , 36F
01/15 00:07, 36F
→
01/15 00:07, , 37F
01/15 00:07, 37F
還有 225 則推文
還有 1 段內文
推
01/15 08:44, , 263F
01/15 08:44, 263F
→
01/15 08:44, , 264F
01/15 08:44, 264F
推
01/15 08:49, , 265F
01/15 08:49, 265F
推
01/15 09:05, , 266F
01/15 09:05, 266F
噓
01/15 09:08, , 267F
01/15 09:08, 267F
→
01/15 09:08, , 268F
01/15 09:08, 268F
噓
01/15 09:41, , 269F
01/15 09:41, 269F
推
01/15 09:55, , 270F
01/15 09:55, 270F
噓
01/15 10:03, , 271F
01/15 10:03, 271F
→
01/15 10:03, , 272F
01/15 10:03, 272F
→
01/15 10:05, , 273F
01/15 10:05, 273F
→
01/15 10:05, , 274F
01/15 10:05, 274F
噓
01/15 11:25, , 275F
01/15 11:25, 275F
→
01/15 11:25, , 276F
01/15 11:25, 276F
推
01/15 11:30, , 277F
01/15 11:30, 277F
噓
01/15 12:01, , 278F
01/15 12:01, 278F
→
01/15 12:03, , 279F
01/15 12:03, 279F
→
01/15 12:27, , 280F
01/15 12:27, 280F
噓
01/15 13:56, , 281F
01/15 13:56, 281F
推
01/15 14:01, , 282F
01/15 14:01, 282F
→
01/15 14:03, , 283F
01/15 14:03, 283F
推
01/15 14:09, , 284F
01/15 14:09, 284F
→
01/15 14:09, , 285F
01/15 14:09, 285F
→
01/15 14:10, , 286F
01/15 14:10, 286F
→
01/15 14:10, , 287F
01/15 14:10, 287F
推
01/15 14:40, , 288F
01/15 14:40, 288F
→
01/15 14:41, , 289F
01/15 14:41, 289F
→
01/15 16:21, , 290F
01/15 16:21, 290F
→
01/15 16:23, , 291F
01/15 16:23, 291F
→
01/15 17:56, , 292F
01/15 17:56, 292F
→
01/15 17:56, , 293F
01/15 17:56, 293F
→
01/15 17:56, , 294F
01/15 17:56, 294F
→
01/15 18:20, , 295F
01/15 18:20, 295F
→
01/15 18:20, , 296F
01/15 18:20, 296F
→
01/15 18:51, , 297F
01/15 18:51, 297F
→
01/15 18:51, , 298F
01/15 18:51, 298F
推
01/16 04:34, , 299F
01/16 04:34, 299F
→
01/16 04:34, , 300F
01/16 04:34, 300F
→
01/16 06:15, , 301F
01/16 06:15, 301F
→
01/16 06:15, , 302F
01/16 06:15, 302F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):