[討論] 關於Surface產品線的定位問題
剛剛在想說微軟這次出那麼多Surface,
又加上Lumia 950(還有之後旗艦)搭載的Win10 Continuum會不會定位重疊之類的,
認真想了下後覺得應該還沒到重疊的地步,彼此之間分際還是有
Lumia系列不用說就還是手機的範疇,
UWP+Continuum雖然可以投影到螢幕上變成一般工作用,
但上面的Office仍然是Mobile版(功能有限),所以應該算是單純輔助的功能吧
Surface這邊,加上這次的Book就變成三條產品線了
(別忘記這次還有個Surface沒出4代)
雖然都是平板+筆電的概念,不過照規格看起來應該是分成初級/進階/專業三個等級
Surface是給一般民眾用的初級平板,
所以能跑一些小遊戲或文書作業與流暢上網就不錯了
Surface Pro是給比較需要更高規格的使用者用的進階型平板,
要說是給誰我也不太能定位,也許是程式設計師、IT之類會需要用到Pro功能的人員吧
Surface Book是給很需要效能的高規使用者用的專業型平板
就是展示裡面提的那些影音編輯、3D建模算圖,可能也還包括電競玩家吧
也許這次就是因為出了Surface Book,所以Pro 4只剩一個規格了
(原本也給Pro系列Cover的高階專業領域看來這次是放手給Book去接了)
希望我沒解讀錯誤(望)
--
推
06/17 02:16,
06/17 02:16
推
06/17 02:17,
06/17 02:17
→
06/17 02:17,
06/17 02:17
推
06/17 02:22,
06/17 02:22
推
06/17 02:22,
06/17 02:22
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.250.111.251
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WindowsPhone/M.1444147404.A.A34.html
→
10/07 00:04, , 1F
10/07 00:04, 1F
推
10/07 00:05, , 2F
10/07 00:05, 2F
→
10/07 00:05, , 3F
10/07 00:05, 3F
→
10/07 00:05, , 4F
10/07 00:05, 4F
啊對我大概想到一個Surface Book不太能及的上Pro 4的部分,
就是Surface Book底座比較大這件事,有些想要到處跑的可能就不太喜歡這個設計吧
雖然這個跟筆電鍵盤沒兩樣的底座
倒是解決了很多人嫌Surface那個放大腿容易顏面著地的問題
推
10/07 00:08, , 5F
10/07 00:08, 5F
推
10/07 00:09, , 6F
10/07 00:09, 6F
→
10/07 00:09, , 7F
10/07 00:09, 7F
推
10/07 00:10, , 8F
10/07 00:10, 8F
→
10/07 00:11, , 9F
10/07 00:11, 9F
→
10/07 00:11, , 10F
10/07 00:11, 10F
推
10/07 00:12, , 11F
10/07 00:12, 11F
推
10/07 00:13, , 12F
10/07 00:13, 12F
※ 編輯: hoyunxian (111.250.111.251), 10/07/2015 00:17:18
→
10/07 00:25, , 13F
10/07 00:25, 13F
→
10/07 00:26, , 14F
10/07 00:26, 14F
推
10/07 00:26, , 15F
10/07 00:26, 15F
→
10/07 00:26, , 16F
10/07 00:26, 16F
→
10/07 00:27, , 17F
10/07 00:27, 17F
推
10/07 00:35, , 18F
10/07 00:35, 18F
→
10/07 00:37, , 19F
10/07 00:37, 19F
而且兩者的大小還是有那麼點微妙的不一樣,SP4插上去尺寸大概不合
※ 編輯: hoyunxian (111.250.111.251), 10/07/2015 00:37:55
推
10/07 00:38, , 20F
10/07 00:38, 20F
→
10/07 00:39, , 21F
10/07 00:39, 21F
推
10/07 00:40, , 22F
10/07 00:40, 22F
→
10/07 00:41, , 23F
10/07 00:41, 23F
推
10/07 00:41, , 24F
10/07 00:41, 24F
→
10/07 00:41, , 25F
10/07 00:41, 25F
推
10/07 00:42, , 26F
10/07 00:42, 26F
推
10/07 00:42, , 27F
10/07 00:42, 27F
→
10/07 00:42, , 28F
10/07 00:42, 28F
→
10/07 00:43, , 29F
10/07 00:43, 29F
→
10/07 00:44, , 30F
10/07 00:44, 30F
推
10/07 00:44, , 31F
10/07 00:44, 31F
推
10/07 00:44, , 32F
10/07 00:44, 32F
→
10/07 00:45, , 33F
10/07 00:45, 33F
→
10/07 00:45, , 34F
10/07 00:45, 34F
→
10/07 00:45, , 35F
10/07 00:45, 35F
→
10/07 00:46, , 36F
10/07 00:46, 36F
推
10/07 00:46, , 37F
10/07 00:46, 37F
推
10/07 00:46, , 38F
10/07 00:46, 38F
→
10/07 00:46, , 39F
10/07 00:46, 39F
→
10/07 00:47, , 40F
10/07 00:47, 40F
→
10/07 00:47, , 41F
10/07 00:47, 41F
推
10/07 00:48, , 42F
10/07 00:48, 42F
→
10/07 00:48, , 43F
10/07 00:48, 43F
推
10/07 00:49, , 44F
10/07 00:49, 44F
→
10/07 00:49, , 45F
10/07 00:49, 45F
→
10/07 00:50, , 46F
10/07 00:50, 46F
推
10/07 00:50, , 47F
10/07 00:50, 47F
→
10/07 00:50, , 48F
10/07 00:50, 48F
→
10/07 00:51, , 49F
10/07 00:51, 49F
→
10/07 00:51, , 50F
10/07 00:51, 50F
→
10/07 00:52, , 51F
10/07 00:52, 51F
→
10/07 00:52, , 52F
10/07 00:52, 52F
→
10/07 00:52, , 53F
10/07 00:52, 53F
→
10/07 00:52, , 54F
10/07 00:52, 54F
推
10/07 00:56, , 55F
10/07 00:56, 55F
推
10/07 00:59, , 56F
10/07 00:59, 56F
→
10/07 00:59, , 57F
10/07 00:59, 57F
→
10/07 01:01, , 58F
10/07 01:01, 58F
→
10/07 01:04, , 59F
10/07 01:04, 59F
→
10/07 01:05, , 60F
10/07 01:05, 60F
→
10/07 01:05, , 61F
10/07 01:05, 61F
→
10/07 01:50, , 62F
10/07 01:50, 62F
→
10/07 01:51, , 63F
10/07 01:51, 63F
推
10/07 02:36, , 64F
10/07 02:36, 64F