Re: [閒聊] AT團是不是越來越多了呢??
: 噓 nash1way:FT=/=AT 不過FT一般還是會優於RT 03/10 17:10
: → Munduss:笑了,二樓連啥叫AT都搞不懂 03/10 17:32
: 噓 goodgeorge:FT是FT AT是AT 兩者明明就不同 而且很好分 03/10 17:33
: → goodgeorge:"安排好的隊伍"呀 必沒有說安排好什麼 03/10 17:48
: → goodgeorge:真正的安排不就是角色 方針等等...EX:這場打快打 03/10 17:49
: → goodgeorge:難道你跟你朋友打時 每次都說好 這次要玩什麼打法? 03/10 17:50
: → goodgeorge:都沒練過快攻 妳朋友都會快攻 都知快攻角怎出怎打 03/10 17:52
: → goodgeorge:我開頭就說了安排的定義是什麼 又是誰說的準呢? 03/10 18:28
: → goodgeorge:那真正的安排不就是全套的嗎? 03/10 18:28
讓我們來看看沒啥公信力的 wikipedia 怎麼說。
在 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle.net Battle.net 說明頁裡面,
Warcraft III 的段落這樣寫:
The matchmaking concept was also expanded to team games in a feature
called "Arranged Teams". In an arranged team game, you could make
a team with one or more friends, which was then anonymously matched
up with another team of the same size and rank.
配對遊戲的概念也延伸到團隊遊戲,實作在一種叫作「安排團隊」的功能上。
在一場「安排團隊」的遊戲中,你可以和一個或多個朋友組隊,
並和其它有相同人數與排名的團隊配對。
所以,「剛好」和「朋友」一起加入「同一個遊戲」還在「同一隊」
到底算不算得上是 AT 呢? XD
--
我實實在在的告訴你們,一粒麥子不落在地裡死了,
仍舊是一粒,若是死了,就結出許多子粒來。
約翰福音 12:24
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.248.178.71
推
03/10 22:50, , 1F
03/10 22:50, 1F
推
03/10 22:51, , 2F
03/10 22:51, 2F
→
03/10 22:51, , 3F
03/10 22:51, 3F
推
03/10 22:58, , 4F
03/10 22:58, 4F
推
03/10 22:58, , 5F
03/10 22:58, 5F
推
03/11 01:34, , 6F
03/11 01:34, 6F
→
03/11 01:37, , 7F
03/11 01:37, 7F
→
03/11 01:38, , 8F
03/11 01:38, 8F
推
03/11 03:01, , 9F
03/11 03:01, 9F
推
03/11 12:46, , 10F
03/11 12:46, 10F
推
03/11 17:42, , 11F
03/11 17:42, 11F
推
03/11 23:47, , 12F
03/11 23:47, 12F
→
03/11 23:50, , 13F
03/11 23:50, 13F
推
03/12 00:35, , 14F
03/12 00:35, 14F
→
03/12 14:43, , 15F
03/12 14:43, 15F
噓
11/04 03:38, , 16F
11/04 03:38, 16F
噓
11/04 03:38, , 17F
11/04 03:38, 17F
噓
11/04 03:38, , 18F
11/04 03:38, 18F
討論串 (同標題文章)