Re: [問卦] 裕隆證實納智捷虧損百億, 但強調會繼續經
看板Tech_Job作者hui2708 (Make *** a sad song)時間8年前 (2017/05/09 09:06)推噓-25(7推 32噓 25→)留言64則, 41人參與討論串3/5 (看更多)
也或許是因為台灣人的劣根性,國產的東西再好也要多花錢去買進口貨,以滿足自己的虛
榮心。
二、三十年前韓國品牌品質也不好,但是韓國的民族性促使他們支持國貨,讓韓國品牌有
機會壯大,進而外銷出口。(行銷能力就又是另外一回事惹)
另外一個原因就是人家的國內市場夠大,內在的需求滿足國產企業的生存,就算不搞出口
,內銷營收也可以讓他們繼續經營。
同樣的故事也幾乎可以套用在四、五十年前的日本。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 116.93.119.120
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Tech_Job/M.1494291980.A.C6E.html
噓
05/09 09:08, , 1F
05/09 09:08, 1F
→
05/09 09:09, , 2F
05/09 09:09, 2F
→
05/09 09:14, , 3F
05/09 09:14, 3F
→
05/09 09:15, , 4F
05/09 09:15, 4F
→
05/09 09:21, , 5F
05/09 09:21, 5F
→
05/09 09:22, , 6F
05/09 09:22, 6F
推
05/09 09:25, , 7F
05/09 09:25, 7F
推
05/09 09:25, , 8F
05/09 09:25, 8F
噓
05/09 09:28, , 9F
05/09 09:28, 9F
噓
05/09 09:30, , 10F
05/09 09:30, 10F
噓
05/09 09:30, , 11F
05/09 09:30, 11F
→
05/09 09:32, , 12F
05/09 09:32, 12F
噓
05/09 09:32, , 13F
05/09 09:32, 13F
→
05/09 09:33, , 14F
05/09 09:33, 14F
推
05/09 09:37, , 15F
05/09 09:37, 15F
噓
05/09 09:39, , 16F
05/09 09:39, 16F
噓
05/09 09:46, , 17F
05/09 09:46, 17F
→
05/09 09:46, , 18F
05/09 09:46, 18F
噓
05/09 09:54, , 19F
05/09 09:54, 19F
→
05/09 09:55, , 20F
05/09 09:55, 20F
噓
05/09 10:05, , 21F
05/09 10:05, 21F
噓
05/09 10:10, , 22F
05/09 10:10, 22F
→
05/09 10:11, , 23F
05/09 10:11, 23F
→
05/09 10:12, , 24F
05/09 10:12, 24F
推
05/09 10:15, , 25F
05/09 10:15, 25F
→
05/09 10:15, , 26F
05/09 10:15, 26F
噓
05/09 10:53, , 27F
05/09 10:53, 27F
噓
05/09 10:54, , 28F
05/09 10:54, 28F
噓
05/09 11:01, , 29F
05/09 11:01, 29F
→
05/09 11:02, , 30F
05/09 11:02, 30F
→
05/09 11:02, , 31F
05/09 11:02, 31F
→
05/09 11:05, , 32F
05/09 11:05, 32F
→
05/09 11:06, , 33F
05/09 11:06, 33F
噓
05/09 11:14, , 34F
05/09 11:14, 34F
噓
05/09 11:32, , 35F
05/09 11:32, 35F
→
05/09 11:32, , 36F
05/09 11:32, 36F
噓
05/09 12:10, , 37F
05/09 12:10, 37F
噓
05/09 12:14, , 38F
05/09 12:14, 38F
噓
05/09 12:17, , 39F
05/09 12:17, 39F
→
05/09 12:17, , 40F
05/09 12:17, 40F
噓
05/09 12:23, , 41F
05/09 12:23, 41F
噓
05/09 12:28, , 42F
05/09 12:28, 42F
推
05/09 12:39, , 43F
05/09 12:39, 43F
→
05/09 12:39, , 44F
05/09 12:39, 44F
→
05/09 12:40, , 45F
05/09 12:40, 45F
噓
05/09 12:40, , 46F
05/09 12:40, 46F
→
05/09 12:40, , 47F
05/09 12:40, 47F
噓
05/09 12:46, , 48F
05/09 12:46, 48F
推
05/09 12:54, , 49F
05/09 12:54, 49F
噓
05/09 12:57, , 50F
05/09 12:57, 50F
推
05/09 12:58, , 51F
05/09 12:58, 51F
→
05/09 12:58, , 52F
05/09 12:58, 52F
→
05/09 12:58, , 53F
05/09 12:58, 53F
噓
05/09 13:05, , 54F
05/09 13:05, 54F
→
05/09 13:05, , 55F
05/09 13:05, 55F
噓
05/09 13:52, , 56F
05/09 13:52, 56F
噓
05/09 15:28, , 57F
05/09 15:28, 57F
噓
05/09 18:53, , 58F
05/09 18:53, 58F
噓
05/09 19:18, , 59F
05/09 19:18, 59F
噓
05/09 19:52, , 60F
05/09 19:52, 60F
噓
05/09 20:07, , 61F
05/09 20:07, 61F
噓
05/09 23:42, , 62F
05/09 23:42, 62F
→
05/10 11:15, , 63F
05/10 11:15, 63F
噓
05/27 19:50, , 64F
05/27 19:50, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 5 篇):