Re: [閒聊] 環境令人無力orz
※ 引述《yauhh (喲)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《yauhh (喲)》之銘言:
: : → yauhh:你不接受卻只是因為你個人的技術信仰. 這就變成很難溝通. 03/28 15:27
: : → yauhh:那你不接受共同的作業方式,怎麼辦?也許他請你走,或你自己走. 03/28 15:28
: : 推 superpai:信仰嗎?你要慶幸很多人對自己該做的事情有所信仰 03/28 15:29
: : → superpai:缺少職業道德...你稱之為信仰的世界你自己想看看會有多糟 03/28 15:30
: : → superpai:先是說是「創新」,再來是「信仰」,明明只是很簡單 03/28 15:32
: : → superpai:對的事情而已,你好像很不認同 03/28 15:32
: 我認為,你沒有弄清楚我認同什麼而不認同什麼.
: 首先,使用CSS,並不是創新; CSS跟table是二種風格的排版要素,不能因為CSS好用
: 而說table不是排版要素. CSS和table二者在我眼中是平等的. 因此,CSS只是一個
: 技術選項,改用或不改用,對公司的流程改善幫助不大.
這真是大錯特錯
table在web的規範裡從來不是排版要素,和css好不好用一點關係都沒有
如果你不懂的話請去w3c看過一次<table>的spec再來討論
我相信會寫程式的人看簡單的html的文件一點問題都沒有
不然的話請給專業一點基本的「尊重」
: 然後我不能理解你所謂「明明只是很簡單」是什麼意思. 你究竟考慮到多少?
: 如果你只看過一本CSS書,書中鼓吹著CSS在排版方面的好處,因為書上文字單方面
我不只看過一本css的說 我看過二十本以上css的書 不過這不是重點
而是要用CSS來排版不是一種好處而是正確的事情
當然我知道你和有些人表示技術沒有對錯
但是我在這個版上以及其他軟體討論區不知道看過多少抱怨說同事不寫註解啦
寫作風格不統一啦,公司文件不齊啦
這種時候我就很少人出來指責說應該順著公司的風格
難道這些就不在技術沒有對錯的範圍
然後有人也說客戶看得到結果公司收得到錢就好
這我只能說這是職業道德的問題
就像醫院為了賺錢,也可以叫醫生猛開壓制症狀的藥,狂丟抗生素
病人又分不出來病因,就以為醫生醫術很好
現在我看到的是一個尊重自己專業的網頁設計師
所以我覺得是應該給與一些認同
至於要他了解現實之類的話是多餘的
只要為了薪水,沒有人是不了解現實的
只有有些人自以為只有自己懂。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 124.11.67.57
→
03/29 08:46, , 1F
03/29 08:46, 1F
→
03/29 08:46, , 2F
03/29 08:46, 2F
→
03/29 08:47, , 3F
03/29 08:47, 3F
→
03/29 08:48, , 4F
03/29 08:48, 4F
→
03/29 08:49, , 5F
03/29 08:49, 5F
→
03/29 08:51, , 6F
03/29 08:51, 6F
→
03/29 08:53, , 7F
03/29 08:53, 7F
→
03/29 08:53, , 8F
03/29 08:53, 8F
→
03/29 08:55, , 9F
03/29 08:55, 9F
→
03/29 08:56, , 10F
03/29 08:56, 10F
→
03/29 08:57, , 11F
03/29 08:57, 11F
→
03/29 08:57, , 12F
03/29 08:57, 12F
→
03/29 08:58, , 13F
03/29 08:58, 13F
→
03/29 08:59, , 14F
03/29 08:59, 14F
→
03/29 09:00, , 15F
03/29 09:00, 15F
→
03/29 09:01, , 16F
03/29 09:01, 16F
→
03/29 09:01, , 17F
03/29 09:01, 17F
→
03/29 09:01, , 18F
03/29 09:01, 18F
→
03/29 09:01, , 19F
03/29 09:01, 19F
→
03/29 09:02, , 20F
03/29 09:02, 20F
→
03/29 09:03, , 21F
03/29 09:03, 21F
→
03/29 09:04, , 22F
03/29 09:04, 22F
→
03/29 09:05, , 23F
03/29 09:05, 23F
→
03/29 09:05, , 24F
03/29 09:05, 24F
→
03/29 12:30, , 25F
03/29 12:30, 25F
→
03/29 12:31, , 26F
03/29 12:31, 26F
→
03/29 12:32, , 27F
03/29 12:32, 27F
→
03/29 12:32, , 28F
03/29 12:32, 28F
→
03/29 12:34, , 29F
03/29 12:34, 29F
→
03/29 12:34, , 30F
03/29 12:34, 30F
→
03/29 12:35, , 31F
03/29 12:35, 31F
→
03/29 12:36, , 32F
03/29 12:36, 32F
→
03/29 12:36, , 33F
03/29 12:36, 33F
→
03/29 12:36, , 34F
03/29 12:36, 34F
→
03/29 12:37, , 35F
03/29 12:37, 35F
→
03/29 12:37, , 36F
03/29 12:37, 36F
→
03/29 12:37, , 37F
03/29 12:37, 37F
→
03/29 12:37, , 38F
03/29 12:37, 38F
→
03/29 12:38, , 39F
03/29 12:38, 39F
→
03/29 12:38, , 40F
03/29 12:38, 40F
→
03/29 12:38, , 41F
03/29 12:38, 41F
→
03/29 12:39, , 42F
03/29 12:39, 42F
→
03/29 12:39, , 43F
03/29 12:39, 43F
→
03/29 12:39, , 44F
03/29 12:39, 44F
→
03/29 12:39, , 45F
03/29 12:39, 45F
→
03/29 12:40, , 46F
03/29 12:40, 46F
→
03/29 12:40, , 47F
03/29 12:40, 47F
→
03/29 12:40, , 48F
03/29 12:40, 48F
→
03/29 12:40, , 49F
03/29 12:40, 49F
→
03/29 12:40, , 50F
03/29 12:40, 50F
→
03/29 12:41, , 51F
03/29 12:41, 51F
→
03/29 12:41, , 52F
03/29 12:41, 52F
→
03/29 12:41, , 53F
03/29 12:41, 53F
→
03/29 12:41, , 54F
03/29 12:41, 54F
→
03/29 12:41, , 55F
03/29 12:41, 55F
→
03/29 12:42, , 56F
03/29 12:42, 56F
→
03/29 12:42, , 57F
03/29 12:42, 57F
→
03/29 12:43, , 58F
03/29 12:43, 58F
→
03/29 12:43, , 59F
03/29 12:43, 59F
→
03/29 12:45, , 60F
03/29 12:45, 60F
→
03/29 12:45, , 61F
03/29 12:45, 61F
→
03/29 12:46, , 62F
03/29 12:46, 62F
→
03/29 12:46, , 63F
03/29 12:46, 63F
→
03/29 12:46, , 64F
03/29 12:46, 64F
→
03/29 12:47, , 65F
03/29 12:47, 65F
→
03/29 12:47, , 66F
03/29 12:47, 66F
→
03/29 12:47, , 67F
03/29 12:47, 67F
→
03/29 12:49, , 68F
03/29 12:49, 68F
→
03/29 12:50, , 69F
03/29 12:50, 69F
→
03/29 12:50, , 70F
03/29 12:50, 70F
→
03/29 12:51, , 71F
03/29 12:51, 71F
→
03/29 12:51, , 72F
03/29 12:51, 72F
→
03/29 12:51, , 73F
03/29 12:51, 73F
→
03/29 12:52, , 74F
03/29 12:52, 74F
→
03/29 12:52, , 75F
03/29 12:52, 75F
→
03/29 12:53, , 76F
03/29 12:53, 76F
→
03/29 12:53, , 77F
03/29 12:53, 77F
→
03/29 12:53, , 78F
03/29 12:53, 78F
→
03/29 12:53, , 79F
03/29 12:53, 79F
→
03/29 12:55, , 80F
03/29 12:55, 80F
→
03/29 12:55, , 81F
03/29 12:55, 81F
→
03/29 12:56, , 82F
03/29 12:56, 82F
→
03/29 12:56, , 83F
03/29 12:56, 83F
→
03/29 13:01, , 84F
03/29 13:01, 84F
→
03/29 13:01, , 85F
03/29 13:01, 85F
→
03/29 13:01, , 86F
03/29 13:01, 86F
→
03/29 13:02, , 87F
03/29 13:02, 87F
→
03/29 13:04, , 88F
03/29 13:04, 88F
→
03/29 13:04, , 89F
03/29 13:04, 89F
→
03/29 14:03, , 90F
03/29 14:03, 90F
→
03/29 17:45, , 91F
03/29 17:45, 91F
→
03/29 17:45, , 92F
03/29 17:45, 92F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
以下文章回應了本文:
閒聊
2
18
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 18 篇):
閒聊
13
37
閒聊
17
87
閒聊
10
10
閒聊
0
92
閒聊
3
15
閒聊
0
11
閒聊
2
24
閒聊
21
65