Re: [問題] 關於台清交碩班
我沒考過我不能告訴你好不好考,
但是以電機類來說 名額較多是事實,
以NTUEE為例 我印象中教授以前給我看的資料是大學部200人左右,
但是研究所名額卻大概400,
然後台大電機約又20%的人出國 5-10%跑到別的領域念研究所,
在5%大概直接跑去工作。
所以...既然研究所名額400人,而台大電機本身可能只剩150不到在念原研究所,
就會空出大概250個名額左右,若清交成也是差不多的情況,
就等於空出大概1000的名額左右,(Maybe加四中等於2000名額)
然後你就可以想...
當初考大學時電機類的第1000+150x4名,會落在哪個大學?
當初考大學時電機類的第2000+150x8名,會落在哪個大學?
※ 引述《niutse (波加波加)》之銘言:
: 看到版上有人在問
: 如果是2類理工
: 讀台清交以外的學校的選擇
: 很多版有都會說
: "沒差啦反正以後都會上台清交碩班"
: 小弟是一類組所以不清楚 只知道台大的管院碩班超難考
: 想問台清交2類碩班真的有這麼好考嗎?
: 隨便一個學校
: 我看到有中央 海大 甚至到上面的逢甲電機
: 都說沒差反正碩班都會上台清交
: 真的每個學校的2類都考的上台清交碩班
: 那其他學校2類碩班是誰會去讀啊
: 請問台清交的2類說碩班真的有那麼好考嗎?
: 還是就跟大家多益都900以上等又是鄉民在嘴砲?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.119.245.79
※ 編輯: louis123321 來自: 140.119.245.79 (08/11 16:12)
推
08/11 16:15, , 1F
08/11 16:15, 1F
→
08/11 16:16, , 2F
08/11 16:16, 2F
→
08/11 16:25, , 3F
08/11 16:25, 3F
→
08/11 16:25, , 4F
08/11 16:25, 4F
→
08/11 16:26, , 5F
08/11 16:26, 5F
→
08/11 16:26, , 6F
08/11 16:26, 6F
這些人基本上都會算入直接去工作的人口,NTUEE幾乎沒看過願意往下念的,
寧願重考或者直接去工作,或者找個機會出國。
※ 編輯: louis123321 來自: 140.119.245.79 (08/11 16:29)
→
08/11 17:26, , 7F
08/11 17:26, 7F
推
08/11 18:13, , 8F
08/11 18:13, 8F
→
08/11 18:16, , 9F
08/11 18:16, 9F
推
08/11 18:50, , 10F
08/11 18:50, 10F
→
08/11 18:50, , 11F
08/11 18:50, 11F
→
08/11 18:51, , 12F
08/11 18:51, 12F
→
08/11 18:52, , 13F
08/11 18:52, 13F
→
08/11 18:52, , 14F
08/11 18:52, 14F
→
08/11 18:53, , 15F
08/11 18:53, 15F
→
08/11 18:53, , 16F
08/11 18:53, 16F
→
08/11 18:55, , 17F
08/11 18:55, 17F
→
08/11 18:57, , 18F
08/11 18:57, 18F
→
08/11 18:57, , 19F
08/11 18:57, 19F
推
08/11 19:01, , 20F
08/11 19:01, 20F
→
08/11 19:02, , 21F
08/11 19:02, 21F
推
08/11 19:45, , 22F
08/11 19:45, 22F
→
08/11 19:47, , 23F
08/11 19:47, 23F
→
08/11 19:48, , 24F
08/11 19:48, 24F
→
08/11 19:50, , 25F
08/11 19:50, 25F
→
08/11 19:51, , 26F
08/11 19:51, 26F
→
08/11 20:00, , 27F
08/11 20:00, 27F
推
08/11 21:46, , 28F
08/11 21:46, 28F
→
08/11 21:48, , 29F
08/11 21:48, 29F
→
08/11 21:48, , 30F
08/11 21:48, 30F
推
08/11 22:03, , 31F
08/11 22:03, 31F
→
08/11 22:48, , 32F
08/11 22:48, 32F
→
08/11 22:50, , 33F
08/11 22:50, 33F
→
08/11 22:50, , 34F
08/11 22:50, 34F
→
08/11 22:51, , 35F
08/11 22:51, 35F
→
08/11 22:51, , 36F
08/11 22:51, 36F
→
08/11 22:52, , 37F
08/11 22:52, 37F
→
08/11 22:52, , 38F
08/11 22:52, 38F
→
08/11 22:53, , 39F
08/11 22:53, 39F
→
08/11 22:53, , 40F
08/11 22:53, 40F
→
08/11 22:53, , 41F
08/11 22:53, 41F
→
08/11 22:54, , 42F
08/11 22:54, 42F
→
08/11 22:54, , 43F
08/11 22:54, 43F
→
08/11 22:54, , 44F
08/11 22:54, 44F
→
08/11 22:55, , 45F
08/11 22:55, 45F
→
08/11 22:55, , 46F
08/11 22:55, 46F
→
08/11 22:55, , 47F
08/11 22:55, 47F
→
08/11 22:56, , 48F
08/11 22:56, 48F
→
08/11 22:56, , 49F
08/11 22:56, 49F
→
08/11 22:57, , 50F
08/11 22:57, 50F
→
08/11 22:58, , 51F
08/11 22:58, 51F
→
08/11 23:06, , 52F
08/11 23:06, 52F
→
08/11 23:09, , 53F
08/11 23:09, 53F
推
08/11 23:13, , 54F
08/11 23:13, 54F
推
08/11 23:14, , 55F
08/11 23:14, 55F
→
08/11 23:14, , 56F
08/11 23:14, 56F
→
08/11 23:14, , 57F
08/11 23:14, 57F
→
08/11 23:15, , 58F
08/11 23:15, 58F
→
08/11 23:15, , 59F
08/11 23:15, 59F
→
08/11 23:16, , 60F
08/11 23:16, 60F
→
08/11 23:17, , 61F
08/11 23:17, 61F
→
08/11 23:23, , 62F
08/11 23:23, 62F
→
08/11 23:23, , 63F
08/11 23:23, 63F
→
08/11 23:24, , 64F
08/11 23:24, 64F
→
08/11 23:27, , 65F
08/11 23:27, 65F
→
08/12 00:00, , 66F
08/12 00:00, 66F
推
08/12 00:54, , 67F
08/12 00:54, 67F
→
08/12 00:54, , 68F
08/12 00:54, 68F
推
08/12 01:43, , 69F
08/12 01:43, 69F
→
08/12 02:18, , 70F
08/12 02:18, 70F
推
08/12 10:08, , 71F
08/12 10:08, 71F
→
08/12 11:20, , 72F
08/12 11:20, 72F
→
08/12 18:30, , 73F
08/12 18:30, 73F
→
08/14 07:23, , 74F
08/14 07:23, 74F
→
08/14 13:29, , 75F
08/14 13:29, 75F
→
08/14 13:29, , 76F
08/14 13:29, 76F
推
08/14 15:44, , 77F
08/14 15:44, 77F
→
08/08 19:42, , 78F
08/08 19:42, 78F
→
09/11 13:12, , 79F
09/11 13:12, 79F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
問題
39
159
以下文章回應了本文:
問題
24
138
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 29 篇):
問題
39
159
問題
13
79
問題
24
138
問題
8
45
問題
14
60
問題
29
88
問題
11
57
問題
-3
35
問題
11
39