Re: [舊聞] Witcher 2 被盜版450萬套
現實層面"只罵"盜版的確沒用
但是"杜絕&制裁"盜版是絕對要走下去的
哪有因為世界上的罪犯抓不完
所以我們就說警察的存在根本就沒用
的確,假如社會上每個人都不犯罪
那警察就是個沒必要的成本
我也懂改變商法會是比較和諧的方式
但是我不支持孟子的性善論
要讓一個人良心發現 棄暗投明
"轉化盜版變成正版"是不可行也無意義的
今天廠商做遊戲出來賣 玩家付錢天經地義
那甚麼理由 要讓廠商多花"轉化盜變正"的成本??
因為盜版抓不完 所以你要自認倒楣
多花成本來迎合盜版 讓他們想要轉正
理由一點也不正當 廠商也無義務要這麼做
"沒辦法 盜版抓不完呀 制止有甚麼用?"
那我也說啦
"沒辦法 盜版絕對不再買正 轉化他們有甚麼用?"
"450萬個不付錢的混蛋看起來很多,但是這群人也不是全部都是一毛不拔的惡魔"
我不懂為什麼會這樣想
小偷偷竊別人的心血 還要我們大發慈悲來諒解他????
遊戲並非維持生命必須品
你偷竊的理由是甚麼??? 總不會像沒錢吃飯所以不得已偷食物那樣吧(這麼做也是犯罪)
盜版的理由就只是"free rider"(遊戲不是公共財 我只想借坐享其成之意)
哪有甚麼其他"不得已"的理由?!
不容易購買(有網拍 還有w所說的steam之類的線上付費機制是個不錯的嘗試)
價錢越來越貴(遊戲不是維持生命必須 你可以選擇不買)
內容有夠爛 BUG有夠多(東西不好吃 所以我們應該偷來先吃
好吃再給錢 不好吃就罵你2句
說我霸王餐吃的合情合理???)
產品不吸引你 要做的是拒買而不是成為偷竊的理由
廠商沒必要為了某些人的犯罪 另外要花"轉化誘因"的成本
這跟"制止犯罪"的成本有相當大的不同
制止的方法就是 撻伐、道德勸說、制裁
轉化的方法??? 我想知道有沒有人想出來並且執行了?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 122.121.0.80
※ 編輯: redhound 來自: 122.121.0.80 (03/29 07:52)
→
03/29 08:01, , 1F
03/29 08:01, 1F
→
03/29 08:01, , 2F
03/29 08:01, 2F
→
03/29 08:02, , 3F
03/29 08:02, 3F
→
03/29 08:02, , 4F
03/29 08:02, 4F
→
03/29 08:32, , 5F
03/29 08:32, 5F
→
03/29 08:33, , 6F
03/29 08:33, 6F
→
03/29 08:34, , 7F
03/29 08:34, 7F
→
03/29 08:35, , 8F
03/29 08:35, 8F
→
03/29 10:13, , 9F
03/29 10:13, 9F
→
03/29 10:16, , 10F
03/29 10:16, 10F
→
03/29 10:17, , 11F
03/29 10:17, 11F
→
03/29 10:17, , 12F
03/29 10:17, 12F
→
03/29 10:18, , 13F
03/29 10:18, 13F
→
03/29 10:19, , 14F
03/29 10:19, 14F
→
03/29 12:00, , 15F
03/29 12:00, 15F
推
03/29 12:00, , 16F
03/29 12:00, 16F
→
03/29 12:01, , 17F
03/29 12:01, 17F
→
03/29 12:01, , 18F
03/29 12:01, 18F
→
03/29 12:01, , 19F
03/29 12:01, 19F
→
03/29 12:02, , 20F
03/29 12:02, 20F
→
03/29 12:03, , 21F
03/29 12:03, 21F
→
03/29 12:04, , 22F
03/29 12:04, 22F
→
03/29 12:05, , 23F
03/29 12:05, 23F
推
03/29 12:06, , 24F
03/29 12:06, 24F
→
03/29 12:06, , 25F
03/29 12:06, 25F
→
03/29 12:08, , 26F
03/29 12:08, 26F
→
03/29 12:09, , 27F
03/29 12:09, 27F
→
03/29 12:10, , 28F
03/29 12:10, 28F
→
03/29 12:13, , 29F
03/29 12:13, 29F
→
03/29 12:13, , 30F
03/29 12:13, 30F
→
03/29 12:13, , 31F
03/29 12:13, 31F
→
03/29 12:14, , 32F
03/29 12:14, 32F
→
03/29 12:14, , 33F
03/29 12:14, 33F
→
03/29 12:17, , 34F
03/29 12:17, 34F
→
03/29 12:17, , 35F
03/29 12:17, 35F
→
03/29 12:18, , 36F
03/29 12:18, 36F
→
03/29 12:20, , 37F
03/29 12:20, 37F
→
03/29 12:28, , 38F
03/29 12:28, 38F
→
03/29 12:41, , 39F
03/29 12:41, 39F
還有 23 則推文
→
03/29 17:42, , 63F
03/29 17:42, 63F
→
03/29 17:42, , 64F
03/29 17:42, 64F
推
03/29 18:15, , 65F
03/29 18:15, 65F
推
03/29 18:28, , 66F
03/29 18:28, 66F
→
03/29 18:29, , 67F
03/29 18:29, 67F
→
03/29 18:30, , 68F
03/29 18:30, 68F
→
03/29 18:46, , 69F
03/29 18:46, 69F
→
03/29 18:47, , 70F
03/29 18:47, 70F
推
03/29 18:50, , 71F
03/29 18:50, 71F
→
03/29 18:51, , 72F
03/29 18:51, 72F
推
03/29 20:02, , 73F
03/29 20:02, 73F
→
03/29 20:56, , 74F
03/29 20:56, 74F
→
03/29 20:56, , 75F
03/29 20:56, 75F
→
03/29 20:57, , 76F
03/29 20:57, 76F
→
03/29 20:57, , 77F
03/29 20:57, 77F
推
03/29 20:57, , 78F
03/29 20:57, 78F
→
03/29 20:59, , 79F
03/29 20:59, 79F
→
03/29 21:00, , 80F
03/29 21:00, 80F
→
03/29 21:00, , 81F
03/29 21:00, 81F
推
03/29 21:05, , 82F
03/29 21:05, 82F
→
03/29 21:40, , 83F
03/29 21:40, 83F
→
03/29 21:41, , 84F
03/29 21:41, 84F
→
03/29 21:42, , 85F
03/29 21:42, 85F
→
03/29 21:42, , 86F
03/29 21:42, 86F
推
03/29 21:54, , 87F
03/29 21:54, 87F
→
03/29 22:03, , 88F
03/29 22:03, 88F
→
03/29 22:05, , 89F
03/29 22:05, 89F
→
03/29 22:11, , 90F
03/29 22:11, 90F
→
03/29 22:14, , 91F
03/29 22:14, 91F
→
03/29 22:14, , 92F
03/29 22:14, 92F
→
03/29 22:20, , 93F
03/29 22:20, 93F
推
03/30 09:24, , 94F
03/30 09:24, 94F
推
03/30 14:02, , 95F
03/30 14:02, 95F
推
03/30 16:22, , 96F
03/30 16:22, 96F
→
03/30 16:23, , 97F
03/30 16:23, 97F
→
03/30 16:23, , 98F
03/30 16:23, 98F
→
03/30 16:24, , 99F
03/30 16:24, 99F
→
03/30 16:24, , 100F
03/30 16:24, 100F
→
03/30 16:24, , 101F
03/30 16:24, 101F
→
03/31 02:33, , 102F
03/31 02:33, 102F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇):