[書籍] Theories of Everything by Logic邏輯萬有理論

看板Physics作者 (Discover2011)時間12年前 (2011/10/14 18:00), 編輯推噓-8(14推 22噓 56→)
留言92則, 30人參與, 最新討論串1/7 (看更多)
The author Wan-Jiung Hu(born1973) is a MD (National Taiwan University) and PhD (Johns Hopkins University). This book contains theories of everything in physics, chemistry, biology, geosciences, philosophy, economics, and theology. Spinnity is a force to drag spacetime to rotate around central mass. Rest mass produces gravity, spinning mass produces spinnity; rest charge produces electricity, spinning charge produces magnetism. Lightity is dark energy. Photon emitted from galaxy expands the universe acceleratedly via radiation pressure. General relativity suggests mass induces spacetime curvature; charge relativity suggests charge induces spacetime torsion(vortex). There is no dark matter, and spiral galaxies (vortex-shaped) are formed due to charge relativity which replaces quantum electrodynamics. Integrating general relativity, charge relativity, and radiation tensor, we get Grand Unified Field Theory. We can also deduct the birth and end of universe. Integrating gravitospinnity and electromagnetism, we deduct a determinative atom model and chemical bond theory replacing quantum mechanics. In addition, I propose a new chemical bond theory according to the new atom model. Homochirality is due to co-catalysis of L-amino acids and D-sugars. Extinction is due to Milankovitch cycle. Earthquake is caused by radiation release from inner earth which explains Electromagnetism/ionosphere anomaly and intra-tectonic earthquakes replacing plate tectonic earthquake theory. Tornado genesis is related to charge relativity. In economics, I propose money conservation and monetary leverage to explain economic bubbles. I propose “Beliefsism” ethics to compete deontology and utilitarianism. Using Godel’s logic, may we prove we believe in one God (Allah, Jehovah, Adi-Buddha, Elohim, and Krishna)? This book is very important to earthquake prediction and tornado control. Many nuclear plants of Taiwan are located near fault areas. If huge earthquake happens, it will cause detrimental effect. I used several nights and weekends to finish this book without affecting my normal work. I am still most interested in biomedicine. I will also use my leisure time to advocate this book only because of the new earthquake theory. Both biomedicine and earthquake research can save millions of lives, so I need to perform them concurrently. -- ※ 發信站 :批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.109.55.237
→
10/14 18:04, , 1F
更正了兩本中文書的錯誤 這本英文書是理論精華
10/14 18:04, 1F
→
10/14 18:05, , 2F
從萬有旋力 熾力 原子論 地震論 到統一場論
10/14 18:05, 2F
→
10/14 18:07, , 3F
為了推廣敝人地震理論 我再度硬著頭皮上架
10/14 18:07, 3F
→
10/14 18:08, , 4F
希望各位能真的看了本書後 再評論
10/14 18:08, 4F
推
10/14 18:09, , 5F
聖經才是萬有理論 榮耀歸於耶和華!!!
10/14 18:09, 5F
→
10/14 18:11, , 6F
德州大學物理系教授JamesPowell看過給我五星評價
10/14 18:11, 6F
→
10/14 18:13, , 7F
對 裡面有哥德爾本體論證明的推廣
10/14 18:13, 7F
噓
10/14 18:40, , 8F
看ID就來測測看我的2有沒有壞
10/14 18:40, 8F
噓
10/14 18:44, , 9F
long time no see ya!!!!!!!
10/14 18:44, 9F
噓
10/14 18:53, , 10F
HELLO!!!!
10/14 18:53, 10F
噓
10/14 19:03, , 11F
hi
10/14 19:03, 11F
→
10/14 19:12, , 12F
天啊..你會不會排版???
10/14 19:12, 12F
→
10/14 19:38, , 13F
很想紅?XDDD
10/14 19:38, 13F
噓
10/14 20:01, , 14F
聖經都比你的書更有科學概念
10/14 20:01, 14F
噓
10/14 20:03, , 15F
多少錢啊?? >0不買喔>.^
10/14 20:03, 15F
推
10/14 20:30, , 16F
"更正了兩本中文書的錯誤" 看來這次D大出的是記事本 大家不
10/14 20:30, 16F
→
10/14 20:30, , 17F
要先噓 可以先去看看 說不定真的不錯用~
10/14 20:30, 17F
噓
10/14 20:37, , 18F
我有問題!!光壓是算在電磁力裡面嗎??
10/14 20:37, 18F
噓
10/14 21:13, , 19F
不送 慢走
10/14 21:13, 19F
推
10/14 21:18, , 20F
謝謝你和林德曼為物理板帶來歡樂
10/14 21:18, 20F
噓
10/14 21:20, , 21F
會請到UT San Antonio的「講師」來背書
10/14 21:20, 21F
→
10/14 21:20, , 22F
可見真的沒什麼人理你的胡言亂語
10/14 21:20, 22F
→
10/14 21:21, , 23F
把講師說成教授，然後不講分校名稱單提德州大學
10/14 21:21, 23F
→
10/14 21:21, , 24F
搞詐騙還這麼心虛，這樣一點都不專業唷
10/14 21:21, 24F
推
10/14 21:23, , 25F
謝謝你和林德曼為物理板帶來歡樂
10/14 21:23, 25F
噓
10/14 22:25, , 26F
這比林德曼還要糟糕啦
10/14 22:25, 26F
→
10/14 22:28, , 27F
有試讀版?
10/14 22:28, 27F
噓
10/14 22:33, , 28F
是啊 林德曼除了偏激了點 至少還有料 這傢伙... 太汙辱林德曼
10/14 22:33, 28F
→
10/14 22:33, , 29F
了吧= =
10/14 22:33, 29F
→
10/14 23:02, , 30F
10/14 23:02, 30F
推
10/15 01:56, , 31F
大推超讚好文你的文章可以跟john01這種假道學一起唬弄人
10/15 01:56, 31F
→
10/15 01:58, , 32F
物理版需要你們的這種垃圾爛文才精彩現在是末法亂世時期
10/15 01:58, 32F
→
10/15 01:59, , 33F
放心啦pentiumevo這種數學系的爛咖他一個字也看不懂了啦
10/15 01:59, 33F
推
10/15 02:04, , 34F
不過基於科學信徒的良心拜託你趕快去弄你的本行不要再來
10/15 02:04, 34F
→
10/15 02:05, , 35F
寫這種文章好嗎?你的每一句話話都是胡說八道侮辱了你的
10/15 02:05, 35F
→
10/15 02:06, , 36F
台大醫科和John Hopkins這些好學校出了你科學素養極差的
10/15 02:06, 36F
推
10/15 02:11, , 37F
然後射了
10/15 02:11, 37F
推
10/15 02:37, , 38F
才離開一陣子沒想到D大又回來了XD 推L大
10/15 02:37, 38F
推
10/15 02:44, , 39F
( ￣□￣)/喔~~喔喔~~喔喔~~喔喔~瓜瓜
10/15 02:44, 39F
推
10/15 07:52, , 40F
I pass by
10/15 07:52, 40F
→
10/15 09:43, , 41F
CJ01I6說的中肯 這本書不會使大家失望
10/15 09:43, 41F
→
10/15 09:45, , 42F
有朝一日 此書能與牛頓的自然哲學與數學原理相提並論
10/15 09:45, 42F
→
10/15 09:45, , 43F
那就是大成功了
10/15 09:45, 43F
→
10/15 09:50, , 44F
抱歉 我以前一直以為他是教瘦
10/15 09:50, 44F
→
10/15 10:03, , 45F
在書中版的統一場論 光壓放在energy-momentum tensor
10/15 10:03, 45F
→
10/15 10:05, , 46F
dUuUv-pg_uv中 p就是光壓
10/15 10:05, 46F
→
10/15 10:22, , 47F
( ￣□￣)/喔~~喔喔~~喔喔~~喔喔~瓜瓜
10/15 10:22, 47F
→
10/15 10:30, , 48F
兩人一起回來了XD
10/15 10:30, 48F
→
10/15 12:08, , 49F
有個主意 寄給我姓名和電郵 可想法寄物理部分PDF給你
10/15 12:08, 49F
→
10/15 12:09, , 50F
不過別寄給其他人 我在考慮這主意可以讓您們試讀
10/15 12:09, 50F
→
10/15 12:13, , 51F
有個小要求 看完後贊同的幫忙推一下不贊同也別噓可乎
10/15 12:13, 51F
推
10/15 13:32, , 52F
Discover2011是台大醫科?!
10/15 13:32, 52F
噓
10/15 13:32, , 53F
救命啊 怎麼還沒結束....
10/15 13:32, 53F
噓
10/15 13:49, , 54F
聽說它不是物理領域的
10/15 13:49, 54F
噓
10/15 14:03, , 55F
樓上 真要說的話物理版一堆神人不是物理系的啊= =
10/15 14:03, 55F
→
10/15 14:03, , 56F
拿是不是本科班出身來說嘴不太厚道
10/15 14:03, 56F
→
10/15 14:08, , 57F
手機的意思是那本書不是物理領域的
10/15 14:08, 57F
→
10/15 14:09, , 58F
他也很專業的用了"它"這個字
10/15 14:09, 58F
噓
10/15 14:11, , 59F
那本書不是物理領域的根本不用"聽說"啊 擺明了就不是...
10/15 14:11, 59F
→
10/15 14:42, , 60F
算奇幻領域吧
10/15 14:42, 60F
→
10/15 17:09, , 61F
我覺得算科幻耶
10/15 17:09, 61F
噓
10/15 17:11, , 62F
所以這三本書是科幻書無誤XD
10/15 17:11, 62F
→
10/15 17:41, , 63F
硬科幻邏輯很嚴謹的説...像亞瑟克拉克的就是
10/15 17:41, 63F
噓
10/15 19:59, , 64F
看到你把你的書跟牛頓的原理相提並論就很不爽了,上次被
10/15 19:59, 64F
→
10/15 20:00, , 65F
我和xgcj拆台和揭穿你這物理程度超爛的還不夠嗎?我只是
10/15 20:00, 65F
→
10/15 20:01, , 66F
又被一群人罵才不爽把罵你的文砍了但是你都沒有反省之意
10/15 20:01, 66F
→
10/15 20:02, , 67F
真正強的人像是Perelman放在arxiv自然就有一堆人去朝聖
10/15 20:02, 67F
→
10/15 20:03, , 68F
要推銷你這種書最好就是去騙pentiumevo這種念數學的白X
10/15 20:03, 68F
噓
10/15 20:06, , 69F
你的書跟原理的共通處就是大部分的人都不會去看,但是差
10/15 20:06, 69F
→
10/15 20:06, , 70F
別在大家知道原理是偉大的書,你的書是爛貨送我都懶得收
10/15 20:06, 70F
→
10/15 21:26, , 71F
若它想弄到arxiv....會被擋認可不知幾百年XDD
10/15 21:26, 71F
→
10/16 09:43, , 72F
試讀版開放預約中 欲約從速
10/16 09:43, 72F
推
10/16 13:09, , 73F
大家趕快寄信預約，可以PO在JOKE讓鄉民笑一笑
10/16 13:09, 73F
→
10/16 23:44, , 74F
L大不是不來物理版了???怎麼有空光臨???
10/16 23:44, 74F
推
10/16 23:59, , 75F
為了你和Discover2011這種亂源我必須扮演物理界警察任務
10/16 23:59, 75F
→
10/17 00:01, , 76F
.....................
10/17 00:01, 76F
→
10/17 00:06, , 77F
( ￣□￣)/喔~~喔喔~~喔喔~~喔喔~爪爪
10/17 00:06, 77F
推
10/17 00:08, , 78F
所以你還來不來物理版?????
10/17 00:08, 78F
→
10/21 22:47, , 79F
不要再玩地震了，先來陪我玩玩MT吧，順便來證明你的理論XD
10/21 22:47, 79F
噓
10/26 18:47, , 80F
感冒心情不好 噓你我就覺得好多了
10/26 18:47, 80F
→
10/27 00:33, , 81F
另外說一下，通常玩MT至少要把儀器放在外面一個月以上
10/27 00:33, 81F
→
10/27 00:33, , 82F
至少要等到太陽磁暴之後，才有辦法量到MOHO的資料
10/27 00:33, 82F
→
10/27 00:34, , 83F
不過根據Dis兄的理論，那表示我MT不用等太陽磁暴
10/27 00:34, 83F
→
10/27 00:35, , 84F
隨便量都可以量到深達MOHO的資訊，那還蠻不錯的說XD
10/27 00:35, 84F
噓
10/27 08:53, , 85F
突然覺得你很可憐...光棍一隻又寫這種廢書,臨終才驚覺自己這輩
10/27 08:53, 85F
→
10/27 08:54, , 86F
子一無所有...唉
10/27 08:54, 86F
→
11/08 09:02, , 87F
台大清大已經有這本書了 先看了再評論
11/08 09:02, 87F
→
11/08 09:03, , 88F
以前愛因斯坦的相對論剛提出來時 也被說是猶太科學
11/08 09:03, 88F
噓
01/02 12:12, , 89F
可惜你不是愛因斯坦
01/02 12:12, 89F
噓
01/04 00:07, , 90F
可惜你不是猶太人(咦?)
01/04 00:07, 90F
→
08/13 16:28, , 91F
謝謝你和林德曼為物理板 https://noxiv.com
08/13 16:28, 91F
→
09/17 14:26, , 92F
........... https://daxiv.com
09/17 14:26, 92F
‣ 更多 Discover2011 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Ec0W-wp (Physics)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇)：
排序： 最舊先 | 最新先 | 留言數
在新視窗開啟完整討論串 (共7篇)
‣ 更多 Discover2011 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1Ec0W-wp (Physics)