Re: [問題] PNAS的期刊地位...?
: ※ 編輯: carpfish 來自: 59.116.32.248 (09/09 18:18)
: → banco:請問一下為什麼綜合類的會比專刊高一級? 09/09 18:24
: 推 Silience:因為那是每個領域的菁英出來會戰的地方...殺的很兇的 09/09 18:26
: → Silience:就像Science 跟 Nature一樣..... 09/09 18:27
: → Silience:或是說就像JACS跟Nano Letter一樣...一般情況下還是JACS 09/09 18:29
: → Silience:的評價會高一點..... 09/09 18:29
: → Silience:因為JACS屬於綜合化學類,Nano Letter就算材料化學類。 09/09 18:34
: 推 lmsmichael:一些期刊都會有一些小弊病 像PNAS美國科學院院士每年都 09/09 19:13
: → lmsmichael:有5篇的額度,不用審直接刊。 09/09 19:14
: → lmsmichael:nanoletters則對編輯很優待~很多nanoletters編輯1年丟 09/09 19:16
: → lmsmichael:上nanoletters7-8篇= =一年nanoletters也才8.900篇 09/09 19:17
: 推 onehundred:我常在PNAS看到爛文章 品質差很多 09/09 20:02
: 推 catpin:PNAS需要其會員推薦才可以submit paper吧? 09/09 20:42
: 推 crazyman5566:不用,隨便你投...只是院士有配額 09/09 20:45
: → crazyman5566:翁啟惠就有配額... 09/09 20:45
: 推 tingyang:pnas我學到還蠻多好的在上面耶 09/09 22:03
: 推 HIbaby:好壞差很多,品質很不一定。 09/09 22:29
: 推 lingon:院士配額文章不用審核, 造成品質不一定 09/09 22:59
: 推 collegeman:PNAS一年前就已經宣告今年7月開始取消配額制了 09/10 00:05
: → collegeman:http://www.pnas.org/content/106/37/15518.full 09/10 00:05
PNAS 並沒有真的取消 NAS 院士的 quota
他只是取消 communication paper
身為 NAS member 一年有四篇登上 PNAS 的 quota
可以是 "contributed"(院士自己出的paper)
或是 "communicated"(院士認為值得登的paper 院士本身並非作者)
今年七月只是取消 communication 但是 contribution 不受影響
(話說 Jim Watson 才在六月底趕搭順風車幫我們隔壁的 PI communicate 一篇PNAS..)
原文如下
As of July 1, 2010, PNAS will no longer allow the submission of papers “
Communicated” to the journal by NAS members and will instead handle these
papers as Direct Submissions. Authors are free to ask an NAS member to edit
their paper as a “Prearranged Editor” prior to submission to PNAS.
Assignments are handled by the Editorial Board, and members who agree in
principle to edit a paper are given special consideration by the board. NAS
member contributions are not affected by this policy change.
※ 編輯: lovenainai 來自: 143.48.25.206 (09/10 03:37)
推
09/10 03:52, , 1F
09/10 03:52, 1F
推
09/10 08:55, , 2F
09/10 08:55, 2F
→
09/10 08:56, , 3F
09/10 08:56, 3F
→
09/10 08:56, , 4F
09/10 08:56, 4F
→
09/10 09:14, , 5F
09/10 09:14, 5F
→
09/10 09:14, , 6F
09/10 09:14, 6F
→
09/10 09:14, , 7F
09/10 09:14, 7F
→
09/10 09:15, , 8F
09/10 09:15, 8F
推
09/10 09:38, , 9F
09/10 09:38, 9F
→
09/10 09:39, , 10F
09/10 09:39, 10F
推
09/10 09:54, , 11F
09/10 09:54, 11F
推
09/10 11:08, , 12F
09/10 11:08, 12F
→
09/11 21:20, , 13F
09/11 21:20, 13F
推
09/12 15:36, , 14F
09/12 15:36, 14F
推
09/12 18:16, , 15F
09/12 18:16, 15F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 3 篇):
問題
20
50