Re: [新聞] 抄襲 博士生丟學位判賠款

看板PhD作者 (上班好辛苦)時間13年前 (2010/08/17 17:03), 編輯推噓1(105)
留言6則, 1人參與, 最新討論串3/4 (看更多)
岔個題,看到這篇報導的時候剛好看到NY Times裡面Stanley Fish的一篇文章: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/09/plagiarism-is-not-a-big-moral-deal/ 縮網址: http://tinyurl.com/35lgqjx 其實Prof. Fish的結論就是: [Plagiarism] is no big moral deal; which doesn’t mean, I hasten to add, that plagiarism shouldn’t be punished — if you’re in our house, you’ve got to play by our rules — just that what you’re punishing is a breach of disciplinary decorum, not a breach of the moral universe. 提出來給大家參考一下. -- -- Fiat lux. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 60.251.101.158

08/17 20:43, , 1F
有趣,不過抄襲真的不是什麼道德問題嗎?作弊也不是道德問題
08/17 20:43, 1F

08/17 20:45, , 2F
上面所說的道德是moral,不是ethical.plagiarism亦譯為剽竊
08/17 20:45, 2F

08/17 20:46, , 3F
如果竊是道德問題,那plagiarism難道不是?
08/17 20:46, 3F

08/17 20:47, , 4F
當然我對Stanley Fish的了解,他應是道德相對論(從早期的
08/17 20:47, 4F

08/17 20:49, , 5F
reader response 到 post-structuralism, 他應該都是
08/17 20:49, 5F

08/17 20:50, , 6F
跟前幾天來的 Chomsky 剛好立場相反
08/17 20:50, 6F
文章代碼(AID): #1CQb1s1c (PhD)
文章代碼(AID): #1CQb1s1c (PhD)