[討論] 湖人歐肥真的不搭老大也能輕易奪冠嗎?
大家都說湖人三連霸是Kobe撿到
沒有ONeal是真的難奪冠
但Kobe隨便換誰真的都能奪冠嗎?
1999-2000當年沒有Kobe湖人根本過不了拓荒者
當年老大才21歲已經是防守第一隊
2000-2001沒啥懸念
2001-2002跟國王也是血戰七場 Kobe一人拿30分
這三年Kobe防守都是前兩隊
扣掉歐肥得分平均也是前三水準
相較之下同期All Star
T-Mac、Carter、AI
單換Kobe也會三連霸嗎?
雖然這三人沒跟歐肥搭過
但是生涯不是沒跟其他All Star搭過
三人加起來 0冠
T-Mac第一輪都過不了
老大無疑是這當中攻守加起來最強的吧
沒有歐肥的湖人不會三連霸
但沒有Kobe的湖人也不會吧?
湖人歐肥真的隨便搭都能到達KO連線的強度嗎?
老大是不是被低估了阿
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.217.168.216
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1503574526.A.F68.html
噓
08/24 19:36, , 1F
08/24 19:36, 1F
→
08/24 19:36, , 2F
08/24 19:36, 2F
→
08/24 19:37, , 3F
08/24 19:37, 3F
→
08/24 19:38, , 4F
08/24 19:38, 4F
→
08/24 19:39, , 5F
08/24 19:39, 5F
→
08/24 19:39, , 6F
08/24 19:39, 6F
→
08/24 19:40, , 7F
08/24 19:40, 7F
推
08/24 19:40, , 8F
08/24 19:40, 8F
→
08/24 19:40, , 9F
08/24 19:40, 9F
→
08/24 19:42, , 10F
08/24 19:42, 10F
→
08/24 19:42, , 11F
08/24 19:42, 11F
→
08/24 19:45, , 12F
08/24 19:45, 12F
→
08/24 19:45, , 13F
08/24 19:45, 13F
→
08/24 19:45, , 14F
08/24 19:45, 14F
→
08/24 19:45, , 15F
08/24 19:45, 15F
→
08/24 19:45, , 16F
08/24 19:45, 16F
→
08/24 19:45, , 17F
08/24 19:45, 17F
→
08/24 19:45, , 18F
08/24 19:45, 18F
→
08/24 19:45, , 19F
08/24 19:45, 19F
噓
08/24 19:46, , 20F
08/24 19:46, 20F
推
08/24 19:46, , 21F
08/24 19:46, 21F
→
08/24 19:47, , 22F
08/24 19:47, 22F
→
08/24 19:48, , 23F
08/24 19:48, 23F
→
08/24 19:48, , 24F
08/24 19:48, 24F
→
08/24 19:48, , 25F
08/24 19:48, 25F
→
08/24 19:49, , 26F
08/24 19:49, 26F
噓
08/24 19:49, , 27F
08/24 19:49, 27F
→
08/24 19:50, , 28F
08/24 19:50, 28F
→
08/24 19:50, , 29F
08/24 19:50, 29F
→
08/24 19:52, , 30F
08/24 19:52, 30F
推
08/24 19:53, , 31F
08/24 19:53, 31F
推
08/24 19:54, , 32F
08/24 19:54, 32F
→
08/24 19:54, , 33F
08/24 19:54, 33F
→
08/24 19:54, , 34F
08/24 19:54, 34F
→
08/24 19:54, , 35F
08/24 19:54, 35F
→
08/24 19:56, , 36F
08/24 19:56, 36F
推
08/24 19:56, , 37F
08/24 19:56, 37F
推
08/24 19:56, , 38F
08/24 19:56, 38F
推
08/24 19:59, , 39F
08/24 19:59, 39F
還有 31 則推文
推
08/24 22:04, , 71F
08/24 22:04, 71F
→
08/24 22:05, , 72F
08/24 22:05, 72F
→
08/24 22:06, , 73F
08/24 22:06, 73F
→
08/24 22:13, , 74F
08/24 22:13, 74F
推
08/24 22:19, , 75F
08/24 22:19, 75F
推
08/24 22:24, , 76F
08/24 22:24, 76F
推
08/24 22:35, , 77F
08/24 22:35, 77F
→
08/24 22:39, , 78F
08/24 22:39, 78F
→
08/24 22:39, , 79F
08/24 22:39, 79F
→
08/24 22:39, , 80F
08/24 22:39, 80F
推
08/24 22:46, , 81F
08/24 22:46, 81F
推
08/24 22:55, , 82F
08/24 22:55, 82F
噓
08/24 22:58, , 83F
08/24 22:58, 83F
噓
08/24 23:14, , 84F
08/24 23:14, 84F
→
08/24 23:16, , 85F
08/24 23:16, 85F
→
08/24 23:17, , 86F
08/24 23:17, 86F
→
08/24 23:18, , 87F
08/24 23:18, 87F
→
08/24 23:18, , 88F
08/24 23:18, 88F
推
08/24 23:24, , 89F
08/24 23:24, 89F
→
08/24 23:24, , 90F
08/24 23:24, 90F
→
08/24 23:24, , 91F
08/24 23:24, 91F
→
08/24 23:27, , 92F
08/24 23:27, 92F
→
08/24 23:39, , 93F
08/24 23:39, 93F
推
08/25 00:00, , 94F
08/25 00:00, 94F
噓
08/25 00:07, , 95F
08/25 00:07, 95F
噓
08/25 00:09, , 96F
08/25 00:09, 96F
推
08/25 00:12, , 97F
08/25 00:12, 97F
→
08/25 00:14, , 98F
08/25 00:14, 98F
→
08/25 00:14, , 99F
08/25 00:14, 99F
→
08/25 00:26, , 100F
08/25 00:26, 100F
→
08/25 00:26, , 101F
08/25 00:26, 101F
推
08/25 05:54, , 102F
08/25 05:54, 102F
噓
08/25 09:10, , 103F
08/25 09:10, 103F
噓
08/25 10:03, , 104F
08/25 10:03, 104F
推
08/25 12:25, , 105F
08/25 12:25, 105F
推
08/25 12:29, , 106F
08/25 12:29, 106F
推
08/25 12:32, , 107F
08/25 12:32, 107F
推
08/25 12:35, , 108F
08/25 12:35, 108F
噓
08/26 07:50, , 109F
08/26 07:50, 109F
推
08/26 09:10, , 110F
08/26 09:10, 110F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 7 篇):