Re: [情報] Brandon Knight to Brooklyn Nets ?
大概回一下:
1.原本這篇文章是在討論"該不該交易Knight給籃網",你硬扯湖人基本上就是詭辯,你要反
駁我應該證明的是Knight的價值在哪裡.
2.你列的數據很有誤導之嫌,我們看一下Per 48:
Mozgov: 19.4分11.3籃板2.4助攻1.6阻攻
Deng: 12.8分11.3籃板2.7助攻1.2抄截
Knight: 21.3分5.2籃板5.9助攻1.0抄截
Knight這效率大概比Deng好,然後比Mozgov差一點,但是Mozgov和Deng在隊上USG%排
第10,11,Knight排第3,持球第三多然後效率是這樣...
3.剛轉隊打不好的球員 vs 沒轉隊數據直接砍半的球員,你覺得哪一個反彈機會大?
4.Mozgov和Deng有防守價值,有老將價值,請問留著Knight對太陽價值是什麼?
繼續打他不喜歡也不會打的替補?
5.市場上3D球員難找,中鋒更難找,最不缺的位置叫控球後衛,趁Knight還有人要趕快賣掉,
避免再次上演三衛風暴,其實是很合理的決策,上次想以拖待變結果是?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.167.24.25
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1479295311.A.AE3.html
→
11/16 19:23, , 1F
11/16 19:23, 1F
→
11/16 19:24, , 2F
11/16 19:24, 2F
→
11/16 19:24, , 3F
11/16 19:24, 3F
→
11/16 19:24, , 4F
11/16 19:24, 4F
→
11/16 19:25, , 5F
11/16 19:25, 5F
→
11/16 19:25, , 6F
11/16 19:25, 6F
→
11/16 19:26, , 7F
11/16 19:26, 7F
→
11/16 19:26, , 8F
11/16 19:26, 8F
上次也是這樣說,結果MM兄弟和Dragic和IT換了什麼值錢東西回來?
※ 編輯: richard1003 (118.167.24.25), 11/16/2016 19:28:34
→
11/16 19:28, , 9F
11/16 19:28, 9F
推
11/16 19:28, , 10F
11/16 19:28, 10F
等到Kinght喊賣我再來賣?你覺得到時候會不會被搶?
※ 編輯: richard1003 (118.167.24.25), 11/16/2016 19:29:48
推
11/16 19:29, , 11F
11/16 19:29, 11F
→
11/16 19:29, , 12F
11/16 19:29, 12F
→
11/16 19:29, , 13F
11/16 19:29, 13F
→
11/16 19:29, , 14F
11/16 19:29, 14F
→
11/16 19:29, , 15F
11/16 19:29, 15F
控球是市場上人最多的位置
噓
11/16 19:30, , 16F
11/16 19:30, 16F
※ 編輯: richard1003 (118.167.24.25), 11/16/2016 19:32:12
→
11/16 19:30, , 17F
11/16 19:30, 17F
→
11/16 19:30, , 18F
11/16 19:30, 18F
→
11/16 19:30, , 19F
11/16 19:30, 19F
→
11/16 19:30, , 20F
11/16 19:30, 20F
→
11/16 19:31, , 21F
11/16 19:31, 21F
→
11/16 19:31, , 22F
11/16 19:31, 22F
那是因為湖人打十人輪替,上場對Cousins就打超過30分鐘且扛得不錯
※ 編輯: richard1003 (118.167.24.25), 11/16/2016 19:33:25
→
11/16 19:34, , 23F
11/16 19:34, 23F
→
11/16 19:34, , 24F
11/16 19:34, 24F
→
11/16 19:35, , 25F
11/16 19:35, 25F
→
11/16 19:35, , 26F
11/16 19:35, 26F
推
11/16 19:35, , 27F
11/16 19:35, 27F
推
11/16 19:36, , 28F
11/16 19:36, 28F
推
11/16 19:37, , 29F
11/16 19:37, 29F
推
11/16 19:37, , 30F
11/16 19:37, 30F
→
11/16 19:37, , 31F
11/16 19:37, 31F
→
11/16 19:38, , 32F
11/16 19:38, 32F
推
11/16 19:39, , 33F
11/16 19:39, 33F
→
11/16 19:39, , 34F
11/16 19:39, 34F
還有 56 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
11/16 21:26, , 91F
11/16 21:26, 91F
噓
11/16 21:30, , 92F
11/16 21:30, 92F
噓
11/16 21:36, , 93F
11/16 21:36, 93F
噓
11/16 21:36, , 94F
11/16 21:36, 94F
推
11/16 21:41, , 95F
11/16 21:41, 95F
噓
11/16 21:44, , 96F
11/16 21:44, 96F
噓
11/16 21:54, , 97F
11/16 21:54, 97F
噓
11/16 22:05, , 98F
11/16 22:05, 98F
推
11/16 22:10, , 99F
11/16 22:10, 99F
噓
11/16 22:24, , 100F
11/16 22:24, 100F
噓
11/16 22:41, , 101F
11/16 22:41, 101F
→
11/16 22:41, , 102F
11/16 22:41, 102F
→
11/16 22:41, , 103F
11/16 22:41, 103F
噓
11/16 22:42, , 104F
11/16 22:42, 104F
→
11/16 22:44, , 105F
11/16 22:44, 105F
→
11/16 22:46, , 106F
11/16 22:46, 106F
→
11/16 22:47, , 107F
11/16 22:47, 107F
噓
11/16 22:54, , 108F
11/16 22:54, 108F
噓
11/16 22:55, , 109F
11/16 22:55, 109F
噓
11/16 22:59, , 110F
11/16 22:59, 110F
→
11/16 22:59, , 111F
11/16 22:59, 111F
噓
11/16 23:14, , 112F
11/16 23:14, 112F
推
11/16 23:18, , 113F
11/16 23:18, 113F
噓
11/16 23:25, , 114F
11/16 23:25, 114F
推
11/16 23:48, , 115F
11/16 23:48, 115F
→
11/16 23:49, , 116F
11/16 23:49, 116F
→
11/16 23:49, , 117F
11/16 23:49, 117F
推
11/16 23:52, , 118F
11/16 23:52, 118F
噓
11/16 23:55, , 119F
11/16 23:55, 119F
推
11/16 23:57, , 120F
11/16 23:57, 120F
→
11/16 23:57, , 121F
11/16 23:57, 121F
→
11/16 23:58, , 122F
11/16 23:58, 122F
→
11/16 23:58, , 123F
11/16 23:58, 123F
噓
11/17 00:36, , 124F
11/17 00:36, 124F
噓
11/17 00:52, , 125F
11/17 00:52, 125F
噓
11/17 01:07, , 126F
11/17 01:07, 126F
→
11/17 01:32, , 127F
11/17 01:32, 127F
噓
11/17 02:07, , 128F
11/17 02:07, 128F
噓
11/17 10:23, , 129F
11/17 10:23, 129F
噓
11/17 14:11, , 130F
11/17 14:11, 130F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 10 篇):