[討論] Clifford真的對林書豪是不好的教練嗎?
記得某個月份
Clifford帶領的黃蜂戰績頗強,跟勇士的Kerr榮獲東西區單月最佳教練
在林書豪剛加入黃蜂的時候,
就說他認為Walker+Lin不遜於浪花兄弟,雖然很嘴但至少很友善
(相較被罵冰箱的那位:林就是不穩定替補不知道當天骰到啥)
相比歷任教練
MDA=>讓林打出林來瘋,但被罵讓林上場時間太多,害他膝蓋受傷
也被批評他最後把所有PG都用光才想到林,根本不是真心捧林
冰箱=>第二季把林丟去打第六人,又讓鬍子掌控一切,徹底被罵
雖然最近因為冰鬍子被炒,讓他的評價回升一點
屬於嘴巴會罵,身體還是很誠實的給林上場時間最高的教練
Scott=>這應該是最被痛恨的,就不用比了,反正最糟
而Clifford對林友善,在林有好表現的時候中途斷法的場次
相比前任兩位算少的,給林掌控球的時間也多
現在看一看被罵的就是關鍵時刻不信任林
(相比以前是罵別的教練亂冰不給上場)
但還是給林有發揮空間,而且Walker是個有身高缺陷的一哥
相較有身高優勢的林還是能在這邊獲得一定的競爭力
如果要離開
去強隊=>能插嘴Kerr還是波波等級的教練跟陣容嗎?
去普隊=>啊不就跟黃蜂差不多,一哥搶不贏,替補又要重新競爭
教練會不會像Clifford一樣友善也不知道
去弱隊=>年齡比起別人沒優勢,最好的狀況就像某年的Jack在某個弱隊打不錯
但接下來又開始轉來轉去,
萬一弱隊又要選新人養,那Scott怎麼養小克的狀況不就又重現?
離開黃蜂,離開Clifford真的是優秀的選擇嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 69.36.65.214
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/NBA/M.1462184964.A.7E1.html
推
05/02 18:31, , 1F
05/02 18:31, 1F
推
05/02 18:31, , 2F
05/02 18:31, 2F
噓
05/02 18:31, , 3F
05/02 18:31, 3F
推
05/02 18:31, , 4F
05/02 18:31, 4F
推
05/02 18:31, , 5F
05/02 18:31, 5F
推
05/02 18:32, , 6F
05/02 18:32, 6F
→
05/02 18:32, , 7F
05/02 18:32, 7F
推
05/02 18:32, , 8F
05/02 18:32, 8F
→
05/02 18:32, , 9F
05/02 18:32, 9F
→
05/02 18:33, , 10F
05/02 18:33, 10F
→
05/02 18:33, , 11F
05/02 18:33, 11F
→
05/02 18:33, , 12F
05/02 18:33, 12F
→
05/02 18:34, , 13F
05/02 18:34, 13F
噓
05/02 18:34, , 14F
05/02 18:34, 14F
推
05/02 18:34, , 15F
05/02 18:34, 15F
→
05/02 18:35, , 16F
05/02 18:35, 16F
→
05/02 18:35, , 17F
05/02 18:35, 17F
→
05/02 18:37, , 18F
05/02 18:37, 18F
推
05/02 18:37, , 19F
05/02 18:37, 19F
→
05/02 18:37, , 20F
05/02 18:37, 20F
推
05/02 18:38, , 21F
05/02 18:38, 21F
→
05/02 18:38, , 22F
05/02 18:38, 22F
→
05/02 18:39, , 23F
05/02 18:39, 23F
推
05/02 18:39, , 24F
05/02 18:39, 24F
→
05/02 18:39, , 25F
05/02 18:39, 25F
推
05/02 18:39, , 26F
05/02 18:39, 26F
推
05/02 18:39, , 27F
05/02 18:39, 27F
推
05/02 18:40, , 28F
05/02 18:40, 28F
→
05/02 18:40, , 29F
05/02 18:40, 29F
推
05/02 18:40, , 30F
05/02 18:40, 30F
→
05/02 18:40, , 31F
05/02 18:40, 31F
→
05/02 18:40, , 32F
05/02 18:40, 32F
→
05/02 18:40, , 33F
05/02 18:40, 33F
推
05/02 18:40, , 34F
05/02 18:40, 34F
推
05/02 18:40, , 35F
05/02 18:40, 35F
→
05/02 18:41, , 36F
05/02 18:41, 36F
→
05/02 18:41, , 37F
05/02 18:41, 37F
→
05/02 18:41, , 38F
05/02 18:41, 38F
→
05/02 18:41, , 39F
05/02 18:41, 39F
還有 131 則推文
推
05/02 20:13, , 171F
05/02 20:13, 171F
→
05/02 20:13, , 172F
05/02 20:13, 172F
→
05/02 20:14, , 173F
05/02 20:14, 173F
→
05/02 20:14, , 174F
05/02 20:14, 174F
→
05/02 20:14, , 175F
05/02 20:14, 175F
推
05/02 20:16, , 176F
05/02 20:16, 176F
噓
05/02 20:27, , 177F
05/02 20:27, 177F
推
05/02 20:28, , 178F
05/02 20:28, 178F
推
05/02 20:28, , 179F
05/02 20:28, 179F
推
05/02 20:28, , 180F
05/02 20:28, 180F
→
05/02 20:30, , 181F
05/02 20:30, 181F
推
05/02 20:32, , 182F
05/02 20:32, 182F
→
05/02 20:32, , 183F
05/02 20:32, 183F
推
05/02 20:51, , 184F
05/02 20:51, 184F
推
05/02 21:01, , 185F
05/02 21:01, 185F
→
05/02 21:01, , 186F
05/02 21:01, 186F
→
05/02 21:06, , 187F
05/02 21:06, 187F
→
05/02 21:07, , 188F
05/02 21:07, 188F
→
05/02 21:09, , 189F
05/02 21:09, 189F
→
05/02 21:09, , 190F
05/02 21:09, 190F
噓
05/02 21:26, , 191F
05/02 21:26, 191F
→
05/02 21:27, , 192F
05/02 21:27, 192F
→
05/02 21:29, , 193F
05/02 21:29, 193F
推
05/02 21:31, , 194F
05/02 21:31, 194F
推
05/02 21:37, , 195F
05/02 21:37, 195F
→
05/02 21:37, , 196F
05/02 21:37, 196F
→
05/02 21:51, , 197F
05/02 21:51, 197F
推
05/02 22:09, , 198F
05/02 22:09, 198F
推
05/02 22:14, , 199F
05/02 22:14, 199F
推
05/02 23:07, , 200F
05/02 23:07, 200F
推
05/02 23:08, , 201F
05/02 23:08, 201F
→
05/02 23:08, , 202F
05/02 23:08, 202F
推
05/02 23:11, , 203F
05/02 23:11, 203F
→
05/02 23:11, , 204F
05/02 23:11, 204F
推
05/02 23:24, , 205F
05/02 23:24, 205F
推
05/03 00:52, , 206F
05/03 00:52, 206F
推
05/03 09:44, , 207F
05/03 09:44, 207F
推
05/03 11:27, , 208F
05/03 11:27, 208F
→
05/03 11:27, , 209F
05/03 11:27, 209F
→
05/04 03:38, , 210F
05/04 03:38, 210F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 8 篇):