Re: [情報] Barkley:在我心裡LBJ永不會排進歷史前5已回收
※ 引述《medstudents (無名)》之銘言:
: MVP FMVP Championships PER WS/48 PER WS/48
: Wilt Chamberlain 4 1 2 26.1 0.248 22.7 0.200
: Oscar Robertson 1 0 1 23.2 0.207 21.0 0.178
: Kobe Bryant 1 2 5 23.4 0.182 22.4 0.157
LeBron James 4 2 2 27.7 0.242 27.3 0.238
: 不然的話,現階段看起來 LBJ 還略遜 Wilt Chamberlain。
: 如果 LBJ 生涯末期沒有衰退的太嚴重,或是再多拿幾個 MVP, FMVP 與冠軍的話,
: 那 LBJ 的歷史地位排在 Wilt Chamberlain 前面不是一件太意外的事。
季賽PER平均值(取球員前10年)
老張 29.14
LBJ 27.81
季後賽平均PER值(取球員前8年,LBJ目前只有八個球季打進季後賽)
老張 26.9
LBJ 27.3
WS/48平均值(球員生涯前10年)
老張 0.258
LBJ 0.242
WS/48平均值(取球員前8年,LBJ目前只有八個球季打進季後賽)
老張 0.240
LBJ 0.238
看不出來老張在"少了"3PT OREB BLK STL這些數據的加權後PER跟WS/48的數據輸在哪...
現在來看球員巔峰時期的數據都不太準 到退休前數據一定會下修
但...LBJ的歷史地位在轉隊抱大腿的同時就注定排不進史上前五
→ emip :轉隊的不少 轉的這麼中二的沒幾個
→ emip :如果是排歷史前5中二轉隊 倒是無可爭議
實在中肯...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.77.80.169
噓
02/17 00:33, , 1F
02/17 00:33, 1F
推
02/17 00:35, , 2F
02/17 00:35, 2F
推
02/17 00:35, , 3F
02/17 00:35, 3F
→
02/17 00:35, , 4F
02/17 00:35, 4F
→
02/17 00:36, , 5F
02/17 00:36, 5F
→
02/17 00:37, , 6F
02/17 00:37, 6F
推
02/17 00:38, , 7F
02/17 00:38, 7F
推
02/17 00:38, , 8F
02/17 00:38, 8F
推
02/17 00:38, , 9F
02/17 00:38, 9F
→
02/17 00:39, , 10F
02/17 00:39, 10F
噓
02/17 00:41, , 11F
02/17 00:41, 11F
噓
02/17 00:41, , 12F
02/17 00:41, 12F
推
02/17 00:42, , 13F
02/17 00:42, 13F
→
02/17 00:42, , 14F
02/17 00:42, 14F
噓
02/17 00:42, , 15F
02/17 00:42, 15F
→
02/17 00:43, , 16F
02/17 00:43, 16F
推
02/17 00:44, , 17F
02/17 00:44, 17F
→
02/17 00:45, , 18F
02/17 00:45, 18F
噓
02/17 00:45, , 19F
02/17 00:45, 19F
→
02/17 00:45, , 20F
02/17 00:45, 20F
推
02/17 00:45, , 21F
02/17 00:45, 21F
推
02/17 00:46, , 22F
02/17 00:46, 22F
推
02/17 00:46, , 23F
02/17 00:46, 23F
→
02/17 00:46, , 24F
02/17 00:46, 24F
→
02/17 00:47, , 25F
02/17 00:47, 25F
→
02/17 00:47, , 26F
02/17 00:47, 26F
噓
02/17 00:47, , 27F
02/17 00:47, 27F
→
02/17 00:47, , 28F
02/17 00:47, 28F
→
02/17 00:47, , 29F
02/17 00:47, 29F
推
02/17 00:47, , 30F
02/17 00:47, 30F
→
02/17 00:48, , 31F
02/17 00:48, 31F
推
02/17 00:48, , 32F
02/17 00:48, 32F
→
02/17 00:48, , 33F
02/17 00:48, 33F
→
02/17 00:48, , 34F
02/17 00:48, 34F
→
02/17 00:48, , 35F
02/17 00:48, 35F
→
02/17 00:49, , 36F
02/17 00:49, 36F
推
02/17 00:49, , 37F
02/17 00:49, 37F
→
02/17 00:49, , 38F
02/17 00:49, 38F
推
02/17 00:49, , 39F
02/17 00:49, 39F
還有 118 則推文
→
02/17 03:22, , 158F
02/17 03:22, 158F
→
02/17 03:26, , 159F
02/17 03:26, 159F
噓
02/17 03:28, , 160F
02/17 03:28, 160F
推
02/17 03:48, , 161F
02/17 03:48, 161F
→
02/17 03:49, , 162F
02/17 03:49, 162F
→
02/17 03:50, , 163F
02/17 03:50, 163F
推
02/17 03:53, , 164F
02/17 03:53, 164F
推
02/17 04:27, , 165F
02/17 04:27, 165F
噓
02/17 04:36, , 166F
02/17 04:36, 166F
推
02/17 06:21, , 167F
02/17 06:21, 167F
推
02/17 06:40, , 168F
02/17 06:40, 168F
推
02/17 06:44, , 169F
02/17 06:44, 169F
→
02/17 06:44, , 170F
02/17 06:44, 170F
※ 編輯: b174040406 來自: 220.132.180.148 (02/17 07:20)
推
02/17 07:24, , 171F
02/17 07:24, 171F
噓
02/17 07:24, , 172F
02/17 07:24, 172F
→
02/17 07:26, , 173F
02/17 07:26, 173F
噓
02/17 07:29, , 174F
02/17 07:29, 174F
推
02/17 07:36, , 175F
02/17 07:36, 175F
推
02/17 07:53, , 176F
02/17 07:53, 176F
推
02/17 08:27, , 177F
02/17 08:27, 177F
推
02/17 08:38, , 178F
02/17 08:38, 178F
推
02/17 09:01, , 179F
02/17 09:01, 179F
推
02/17 09:04, , 180F
02/17 09:04, 180F
推
02/17 09:06, , 181F
02/17 09:06, 181F
推
02/17 09:28, , 182F
02/17 09:28, 182F
推
02/17 09:43, , 183F
02/17 09:43, 183F
推
02/17 09:50, , 184F
02/17 09:50, 184F
噓
02/17 10:20, , 185F
02/17 10:20, 185F
→
02/17 10:59, , 186F
02/17 10:59, 186F
推
02/17 11:00, , 187F
02/17 11:00, 187F
推
02/17 12:08, , 188F
02/17 12:08, 188F
推
02/17 12:21, , 189F
02/17 12:21, 189F
→
02/17 12:34, , 190F
02/17 12:34, 190F
推
02/17 12:38, , 191F
02/17 12:38, 191F
推
02/17 13:18, , 192F
02/17 13:18, 192F
→
02/17 13:20, , 193F
02/17 13:20, 193F
噓
02/17 13:39, , 194F
02/17 13:39, 194F
噓
02/17 17:13, , 195F
02/17 17:13, 195F
推
02/27 14:11, , 196F
02/27 14:11, 196F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 17 篇):