Re: [討論] 如果Kobe跟MJ同一隊.....已回收
事實上
就有類似kobe的人跟MJ同隊過
答案就是 Ron Harper
Ron Harper在沒受過大傷前 可是號稱 "西區的喬丹"
也是很能得分的SG
來到公牛後~ 他名義上是掛PG
可是公牛真正的攻擊啟動機是pippen
在公牛的Harper
能搶分 能以身高壓迫對方PG 能支援1~3號位置
我覺得這都是Kobe復出後的榜樣
放下獨尊心態
與Nash一起建立流暢的傳導~ 以Nash的本事 加上Pau Gasol
就算沒有Howard
只要Kobe願意打出團隊籃球~ 要進季後賽還是沒有問題!!!!
(一堆人都唱雖Gasol~ Gasol就算現在放出來~ 還是一堆人搶著要~)
再加上kobe絕殺能力、吸夾力強過harper許多
只要他願意改變打法
湖人隊還是大有可為的....
--
http://photo.xuite.net/sukishiori/5847585/2.jpg/sizes/o/
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 1.160.51.37
推
09/19 21:03, , 1F
09/19 21:03, 1F
※ 編輯: TakeDoll 來自: 1.160.51.37 (09/19 21:05)
→
09/19 21:06, , 2F
09/19 21:06, 2F
推
09/19 21:06, , 3F
09/19 21:06, 3F
推
09/19 21:06, , 4F
09/19 21:06, 4F
我自己是覺得不會太犧牲啦~ 不知道kobe會怎想
如果真能轉型成 類似pippen harper的多功能衛
打出
15.6分 6.7板 9.4助攻 命中率51.3趴 這種超高效成績的話
把得分轉移給大空擋的人
一起提升團隊命中率~ 我相信戰績不會差到哪~
這種數據也很漂亮阿~
※ 編輯: TakeDoll 來自: 1.160.51.37 (09/19 21:13)
→
09/19 21:08, , 5F
09/19 21:08, 5F
噓
09/19 21:08, , 6F
09/19 21:08, 6F
當然~ 強多了
→
09/19 21:09, , 7F
09/19 21:09, 7F
→
09/19 21:09, , 8F
09/19 21:09, 8F
→
09/19 21:10, , 9F
09/19 21:10, 9F
→
09/19 21:10, , 10F
09/19 21:10, 10F
推
09/19 21:12, , 11F
09/19 21:12, 11F
→
09/19 21:12, , 12F
09/19 21:12, 12F
※ 編輯: TakeDoll 來自: 1.160.51.37 (09/19 21:14)
推
09/19 21:15, , 13F
09/19 21:15, 13F
推
09/19 21:21, , 14F
09/19 21:21, 14F
→
09/19 21:22, , 15F
09/19 21:22, 15F
→
09/19 21:23, , 16F
09/19 21:23, 16F
推
09/19 21:30, , 17F
09/19 21:30, 17F
推
09/19 21:35, , 18F
09/19 21:35, 18F
→
09/19 21:41, , 19F
09/19 21:41, 19F
→
09/19 21:42, , 20F
09/19 21:42, 20F
推
09/19 21:42, , 21F
09/19 21:42, 21F
→
09/19 21:42, , 22F
09/19 21:42, 22F
→
09/19 21:43, , 23F
09/19 21:43, 23F
→
09/19 21:43, , 24F
09/19 21:43, 24F
→
09/19 21:44, , 25F
09/19 21:44, 25F
推
09/19 21:50, , 26F
09/19 21:50, 26F
推
09/19 21:51, , 27F
09/19 21:51, 27F
→
09/19 21:52, , 28F
09/19 21:52, 28F
→
09/19 21:53, , 29F
09/19 21:53, 29F
→
09/19 21:56, , 30F
09/19 21:56, 30F
推
09/19 21:57, , 31F
09/19 21:57, 31F
推
09/19 21:57, , 32F
09/19 21:57, 32F
推
09/19 21:59, , 33F
09/19 21:59, 33F
→
09/19 22:10, , 34F
09/19 22:10, 34F
推
09/19 22:14, , 35F
09/19 22:14, 35F
推
09/19 22:34, , 36F
09/19 22:34, 36F
推
09/19 22:36, , 37F
09/19 22:36, 37F
→
09/19 22:36, , 38F
09/19 22:36, 38F
推
09/19 22:50, , 39F
09/19 22:50, 39F
推
09/19 22:50, , 40F
09/19 22:50, 40F
→
09/19 22:50, , 41F
09/19 22:50, 41F
推
09/19 22:53, , 42F
09/19 22:53, 42F
→
09/19 22:54, , 43F
09/19 22:54, 43F
推
09/19 23:13, , 44F
09/19 23:13, 44F
推
09/19 23:13, , 45F
09/19 23:13, 45F
→
09/19 23:14, , 46F
09/19 23:14, 46F
推
09/19 23:21, , 47F
09/19 23:21, 47F
→
09/19 23:21, , 48F
09/19 23:21, 48F
→
09/19 23:21, , 49F
09/19 23:21, 49F
→
09/19 23:28, , 50F
09/19 23:28, 50F
噓
09/19 23:39, , 51F
09/19 23:39, 51F
→
09/19 23:39, , 52F
09/19 23:39, 52F
推
09/19 23:46, , 53F
09/19 23:46, 53F
噓
09/20 00:32, , 54F
09/20 00:32, 54F
推
09/20 00:42, , 55F
09/20 00:42, 55F
→
09/20 00:48, , 56F
09/20 00:48, 56F
→
09/20 00:49, , 57F
09/20 00:49, 57F
→
09/20 00:57, , 58F
09/20 00:57, 58F
→
09/20 01:28, , 59F
09/20 01:28, 59F
噓
09/20 12:19, , 60F
09/20 12:19, 60F
推
09/20 12:50, , 61F
09/20 12:50, 61F
噓
09/20 13:58, , 62F
09/20 13:58, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 4 篇):