[討論] 如果Kobe跟MJ同一隊.....已回收
先不考慮誰比較強弱
只考慮到做人及個性問題
假設Kobe跟MJ的年紀沒有差那麼多
Kobe從板凳打起
MJ就有點像是歐肥的背景
Kobe一開始的老大哥是MJ
那MJ有辦法管的動Kobe
不讓他篡位奪權嗎?
印象中MJ的統治力很高
隊友們都會很服他
小蟲都可以乖乖聽MJ的話
雖然MJ退休後也挺黑的
如果說以能力值來看
MJ 統:100 武:100 智:98 政治:65 魅力:100
KB 統:75 武:99 智:60 政治:100 魅力:100
統(帶領隊友引導隊友能力)
武(單兵能力 攻擊防守)
智(打球智商 出手時機的選擇 控場能力)
政(球隊權力鬥爭的能力)
魅(知名度及受喜愛程度)
MJ可以統領隊友並靠著自己的威望讓隊友們信服
不知Kobe可否被MJ訓服??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 60.250.111.118
推
09/13 13:04, , 1F
09/13 13:04, 1F
→
09/13 13:04, , 2F
09/13 13:04, 2F
噓
09/13 13:04, , 3F
09/13 13:04, 3F
推
09/13 13:04, , 4F
09/13 13:04, 4F
→
09/13 13:05, , 5F
09/13 13:05, 5F
→
09/13 13:06, , 6F
09/13 13:06, 6F
→
09/13 13:06, , 7F
09/13 13:06, 7F
推
09/13 13:07, , 8F
09/13 13:07, 8F
推
09/13 13:07, , 9F
09/13 13:07, 9F
推
09/13 13:08, , 10F
09/13 13:08, 10F
推
09/13 13:13, , 11F
09/13 13:13, 11F
推
09/13 13:15, , 12F
09/13 13:15, 12F
推
09/13 13:15, , 13F
09/13 13:15, 13F
→
09/13 13:15, , 14F
09/13 13:15, 14F
→
09/13 13:16, , 15F
09/13 13:16, 15F
→
09/13 13:17, , 16F
09/13 13:17, 16F
→
09/13 13:18, , 17F
09/13 13:18, 17F
推
09/13 13:20, , 18F
09/13 13:20, 18F
噓
09/13 13:24, , 19F
09/13 13:24, 19F
噓
09/13 13:25, , 20F
09/13 13:25, 20F
推
09/13 13:27, , 21F
09/13 13:27, 21F
噓
09/13 13:28, , 22F
09/13 13:28, 22F
推
09/13 13:28, , 23F
09/13 13:28, 23F
推
09/13 13:30, , 24F
09/13 13:30, 24F
推
09/13 13:30, , 25F
09/13 13:30, 25F
推
09/13 13:31, , 26F
09/13 13:31, 26F
→
09/13 13:32, , 27F
09/13 13:32, 27F
→
09/13 13:35, , 28F
09/13 13:35, 28F
→
09/13 13:48, , 29F
09/13 13:48, 29F
→
09/13 13:48, , 30F
09/13 13:48, 30F
→
09/13 14:04, , 31F
09/13 14:04, 31F
→
09/13 14:13, , 32F
09/13 14:13, 32F
→
09/13 14:13, , 33F
09/13 14:13, 33F
→
09/13 14:18, , 34F
09/13 14:18, 34F
推
09/13 14:37, , 35F
09/13 14:37, 35F
→
09/13 14:40, , 36F
09/13 14:40, 36F
→
09/13 15:13, , 37F
09/13 15:13, 37F
→
09/13 15:16, , 38F
09/13 15:16, 38F
推
09/13 15:43, , 39F
09/13 15:43, 39F
噓
09/13 16:11, , 40F
09/13 16:11, 40F
噓
09/13 16:41, , 41F
09/13 16:41, 41F
→
09/13 16:43, , 42F
09/13 16:43, 42F
→
09/13 16:44, , 43F
09/13 16:44, 43F
→
09/13 17:11, , 44F
09/13 17:11, 44F
推
09/13 17:34, , 45F
09/13 17:34, 45F
推
09/13 17:35, , 46F
09/13 17:35, 46F
→
09/13 17:35, , 47F
09/13 17:35, 47F
推
09/13 18:19, , 48F
09/13 18:19, 48F
推
09/13 18:58, , 49F
09/13 18:58, 49F
推
09/13 18:59, , 50F
09/13 18:59, 50F
噓
09/13 19:38, , 51F
09/13 19:38, 51F
推
09/13 20:02, , 52F
09/13 20:02, 52F
→
09/13 20:02, , 53F
09/13 20:02, 53F
→
09/13 20:02, , 54F
09/13 20:02, 54F
推
09/13 20:06, , 55F
09/13 20:06, 55F
推
09/13 20:46, , 56F
09/13 20:46, 56F
噓
09/13 20:59, , 57F
09/13 20:59, 57F
推
09/13 22:02, , 58F
09/13 22:02, 58F
噓
09/14 09:29, , 59F
09/14 09:29, 59F
噓
09/14 10:53, , 60F
09/14 10:53, 60F
噓
09/14 10:54, , 61F
09/14 10:54, 61F
噓
09/14 10:55, , 62F
09/14 10:55, 62F
噓
09/14 14:57, , 63F
09/14 14:57, 63F
噓
09/14 17:14, , 64F
09/14 17:14, 64F
推
09/15 02:14, , 65F
09/15 02:14, 65F
噓
09/15 06:31, , 66F
09/15 06:31, 66F
推
09/19 21:53, , 67F
09/19 21:53, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):