Re: [討論] 假設公牛王朝時期季後賽遇到PIPPEN報銷已回收
Pippen在攻守控的方面板上都討論很多了
這標題下一系列的討論文也多次提到 就不囉唆贅述了
除此之外
Pippen還有一大價值就是在後面挑戰連霸1996~98時期的薪資
當時NBA聯盟的薪資有爆發性的成長
我懶得去查當時的新人約
但如果把新人約扣掉
Pippen絕對是當年的最有CP值球員
這麼形容不夠具體實際
簡單列出後三連霸時期公牛幾位隊員和其他各隊的幾個標竿薪資來做比較
季後賽冠軍強敵.四大中鋒這些有列出 或多或少也會有遺珠之憾
Pippen Jordan Rodman Kukoc
1993-94 3,075,000 4,000,000 2,450,000 1,025,000
1994-95 2,225,000 3,850,000 2,500,000 3,260,000
1995-96 2,925,000 3,850,000 2,500,000 3,560,000
1996-97 2,250,000 30,140,000 9,000,000 3,960,000
1997-98 2,775,000 33,140,000 4,500,000 4,560,000
1998-99 11,000,000 1,000,000 4,610,000
1999-00 14,795,642 4,500,000
2000-01 13,750,000 6,000,000
Olajuwon Drexler Robinson Ewing ONeal
1993-94 3,170,000 1,578,000 5,740,000 3,825,000 3,900,000
1994-95 3,170,000 1,578,000 7,300,000 4,486,700 4,800,000
1995-96 3,169,900 9,810,000 7,700,000 18,724,000 5,700,000
1996-97 5,305,000 5,500,000 9,952,000 3,000,000 10,714,000
1997-98 9,655,000 5,500,000 12,397,440 20,500,000 12,857,143
1998-99 11,156,000 14,841,000 18,500,000 15,000,000
1999-00 12,943,000 11,592,683 15,000,000 17,142,858
2000-01 14,302,001 14,700,000 14,000,000 19,285,715
Malone Stockton Miller Barkley Payton
1993-94 3,081,000 2,400,000 3,211,000 3,250,000 2,383,000
1994-95 3,378,800 2,600,000 3,011,000 4,030,000 2,583,300
1995-96 3,676,000 2,800,000 3,210,500 4,760,000 2,783,000
1996-97 4,657,000 6,000,000 11,250,000 4,695,000 10,212,000
1997-98 5,118,578 5,000,000 9,031,850 2,250,000 10,514,688
1998-99 6,142,000 4,000,000 6,781,000 1,000,000 8,715,000
1999-00 14,000,000 11,000,000 9,031,850 9,000,000 11,020,473
2000-01 15,750,000 11,000,000 10,670,000 12,200,000
看完這一串 基本上可以體會到公牛的薪資優勢
芝加哥本來就是有錢大城了 再加上PIPPEN壓低的低薪長約
可以留住及補強公牛隊的陣容 有力奪冠
拿1995-96 2,925,000的薪資
對照起Pippen後來被高薪挖角到阿拓的高薪 也可見其市場評價
1998-99 11,000,000 1999-00 14,795,642 2000-01 13,750,000
公牛隊從中賺取的溢價 11,000,000-2,925,000 更不是小數目
即使考慮到阿拓出價過高而買貴的可能
打點折扣出9,000,000應該也算便宜了
如果上面打得你還是跨嚨謀
你就把這個比例放到近十年奪冠隊
把他們球隊二哥的薪資直接拿來除以3
大概就是這樣的優勢吧
而且當年不流行 老將低薪 降薪入隊 魔球板凳 這些事情 . . .
更顯得這優勢差距之大
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.184.135.30
推
05/13 10:47, , 1F
05/13 10:47, 1F
推
05/13 10:48, , 2F
05/13 10:48, 2F
推
05/13 10:50, , 3F
05/13 10:50, 3F
→
05/13 10:53, , 4F
05/13 10:53, 4F
推
05/13 10:53, , 5F
05/13 10:53, 5F
推
05/13 10:54, , 6F
05/13 10:54, 6F
→
05/13 10:55, , 7F
05/13 10:55, 7F
→
05/13 10:56, , 8F
05/13 10:56, 8F
推
05/13 10:57, , 9F
05/13 10:57, 9F
→
05/13 10:57, , 10F
05/13 10:57, 10F
→
05/13 10:58, , 11F
05/13 10:58, 11F
推
05/13 10:59, , 12F
05/13 10:59, 12F
→
05/13 10:59, , 13F
05/13 10:59, 13F
→
05/13 11:00, , 14F
05/13 11:00, 14F
推
05/13 11:00, , 15F
05/13 11:00, 15F
→
05/13 11:00, , 16F
05/13 11:00, 16F
→
05/13 11:00, , 17F
05/13 11:00, 17F
→
05/13 11:01, , 18F
05/13 11:01, 18F
→
05/13 11:02, , 19F
05/13 11:02, 19F
→
05/13 11:03, , 20F
05/13 11:03, 20F
→
05/13 11:03, , 21F
05/13 11:03, 21F
推
05/13 11:17, , 22F
05/13 11:17, 22F
→
05/13 11:18, , 23F
05/13 11:18, 23F
推
05/13 11:18, , 24F
05/13 11:18, 24F
→
05/13 11:21, , 25F
05/13 11:21, 25F
→
05/13 11:22, , 26F
05/13 11:22, 26F
→
05/13 11:23, , 27F
05/13 11:23, 27F
推
05/13 11:24, , 28F
05/13 11:24, 28F
推
05/13 11:26, , 29F
05/13 11:26, 29F
推
05/13 11:28, , 30F
05/13 11:28, 30F
→
05/13 11:29, , 31F
05/13 11:29, 31F
→
05/13 11:29, , 32F
05/13 11:29, 32F
→
05/13 11:29, , 33F
05/13 11:29, 33F
→
05/13 11:32, , 34F
05/13 11:32, 34F
→
05/13 11:32, , 35F
05/13 11:32, 35F
推
05/13 11:37, , 36F
05/13 11:37, 36F
推
05/13 11:53, , 37F
05/13 11:53, 37F
→
05/13 11:53, , 38F
05/13 11:53, 38F
推
05/13 11:58, , 39F
05/13 11:58, 39F
→
05/13 11:59, , 40F
05/13 11:59, 40F
→
05/13 12:02, , 41F
05/13 12:02, 41F
推
05/13 12:19, , 42F
05/13 12:19, 42F
→
05/13 12:20, , 43F
05/13 12:20, 43F
推
05/13 12:21, , 44F
05/13 12:21, 44F
→
05/13 12:22, , 45F
05/13 12:22, 45F
→
05/13 12:22, , 46F
05/13 12:22, 46F
→
05/13 12:23, , 47F
05/13 12:23, 47F
→
05/13 12:23, , 48F
05/13 12:23, 48F
→
05/13 12:24, , 49F
05/13 12:24, 49F
推
05/13 12:33, , 50F
05/13 12:33, 50F
推
05/13 12:44, , 51F
05/13 12:44, 51F
推
05/13 13:30, , 52F
05/13 13:30, 52F
→
05/13 13:43, , 53F
05/13 13:43, 53F
→
05/13 13:43, , 54F
05/13 13:43, 54F
→
05/13 13:45, , 55F
05/13 13:45, 55F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 6 篇):