Re: [閒聊] 屏東的健身房
: 推 EvanYang:ㄎㄎㄎ....反問真容易,負責出嘴就好 02/28 22:22
: → Moirae:看來我們討論的點根本不同 我說的是 身高這種實驗無從做起 02/28 22:44
: → Moirae:而何謂過度 是不會有準確定義的 那些幾%的數字都是人猜的罷 02/28 22:46
: → ermae:第二篇有做身高我要告訴你嗎 他實驗做幾年我要告訴你嗎 02/28 23:02
第二篇的結果
RESULTS:
Experimental programs most often used isotonic machines and free weights, 2-
and 3-day protocols, and 8- and 12-week durations, with significant
improvements in muscular strength during childhood and early adolescence.
Strength gains were lost during detraining. Experimental resistance training
programs did not influence growth in height and weight of pre- and
early-adolescent youth, and changes in estimates of body composition were
variable and quite small. Only 10 studies systematically monitored injuries,
and only three injuries were reported. Estimated injury rates were 0.176,
0.053, and 0.055 per 100 participant-hours in the respective programs.
第五行說不會影響長高,這表示那段時間小孩還是在長高。
但這不代表他有 "長出某個他本來可以長到的高度",
就像我一開始打的 180cm / 200cm 問題。
這三個月小孩長了3公分 -> 就表示訓練不影響長高?
那說不定小孩不訓練,這段時間他會長高6公分啊。
這才是我要表達的,這些實驗結果是沒有實質意義的,
同一個實驗無法在同一個人身上重複兩次,因為那個時間點已經過去了。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.161.195.205
→
02/28 23:55, , 1F
02/28 23:55, 1F
噓
02/29 01:27, , 2F
02/29 01:27, 2F
→
02/29 01:28, , 3F
02/29 01:28, 3F
→
02/29 01:29, , 4F
02/29 01:29, 4F
→
02/29 01:30, , 5F
02/29 01:30, 5F
→
02/29 01:31, , 6F
02/29 01:31, 6F
→
02/29 01:32, , 7F
02/29 01:32, 7F
→
02/29 01:32, , 8F
02/29 01:32, 8F
推
02/29 09:33, , 9F
02/29 09:33, 9F
→
02/29 12:56, , 10F
02/29 12:56, 10F
→
02/29 12:59, , 11F
02/29 12:59, 11F
噓
02/29 18:28, , 12F
02/29 18:28, 12F
討論串 (同標題文章)