[問題] 為什麼HTC系統UI最好? 可是賣這麼爛?
常常看到有人在推薦手機時
某某手機:規格,照相,價錢勝
HTC 手機:系統穩定度勝
然後補上一句,挑系統穩定的HTC!
我看PTT似乎得到一個結論:HTC的系統是安卓最好的,沒有之一
但是我就很納悶了...為什麼系統穩定度最好這麼大的賣點
為什麼全球的消費者都不買單?搞到HTC在2016年全球市佔只剩0.63%
然後年年虧損,從安卓界的巨頭,摔到在世界變成沒沒無聞的廠商
明明就有最佳的賣點"系統穩定度",為什麼好像完全沒有起到賣點的作用
個人覺得很可惜
--
HTC2016年全球市占率僅0.68%。同時HTC在2011年鼎盛時期的市值,一度高達338億美
元。然而市場形勢瞬息萬變,短短四年時間,HTC就從當初的安卓第一手機生産商,淪爲
了市值只有僅僅20億美元的三流廠商。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 115.82.176.54
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1496303893.A.631.html
→
06/01 16:01, , 1F
06/01 16:01, 1F
→
06/01 16:02, , 2F
06/01 16:02, 2F
→
06/01 16:02, , 3F
06/01 16:02, 3F
推
06/01 16:02, , 4F
06/01 16:02, 4F
→
06/01 16:02, , 5F
06/01 16:02, 5F
→
06/01 16:03, , 6F
06/01 16:03, 6F
→
06/01 16:03, , 7F
06/01 16:03, 7F
→
06/01 16:03, , 8F
06/01 16:03, 8F
→
06/01 16:03, , 9F
06/01 16:03, 9F
→
06/01 16:03, , 10F
06/01 16:03, 10F
推
06/01 16:05, , 11F
06/01 16:05, 11F
→
06/01 16:05, , 12F
06/01 16:05, 12F
→
06/01 16:05, , 13F
06/01 16:05, 13F
→
06/01 16:05, , 14F
06/01 16:05, 14F
→
06/01 16:05, , 15F
06/01 16:05, 15F
→
06/01 16:06, , 16F
06/01 16:06, 16F
推
06/01 16:07, , 17F
06/01 16:07, 17F
→
06/01 16:07, , 18F
06/01 16:07, 18F
→
06/01 16:07, , 19F
06/01 16:07, 19F
→
06/01 16:09, , 20F
06/01 16:09, 20F
推
06/01 16:12, , 21F
06/01 16:12, 21F
推
06/01 16:14, , 22F
06/01 16:14, 22F
→
06/01 16:14, , 23F
06/01 16:14, 23F
→
06/01 16:16, , 24F
06/01 16:16, 24F
推
06/01 16:19, , 25F
06/01 16:19, 25F
→
06/01 16:19, , 26F
06/01 16:19, 26F
→
06/01 16:19, , 27F
06/01 16:19, 27F
→
06/01 16:21, , 28F
06/01 16:21, 28F
→
06/01 16:21, , 29F
06/01 16:21, 29F
推
06/01 16:22, , 30F
06/01 16:22, 30F
推
06/01 16:22, , 31F
06/01 16:22, 31F
→
06/01 16:22, , 32F
06/01 16:22, 32F
→
06/01 16:22, , 33F
06/01 16:22, 33F
→
06/01 16:22, , 34F
06/01 16:22, 34F
→
06/01 16:22, , 35F
06/01 16:22, 35F
推
06/01 16:28, , 36F
06/01 16:28, 36F
→
06/01 16:28, , 37F
06/01 16:28, 37F
推
06/01 16:30, , 38F
06/01 16:30, 38F
推
06/01 16:30, , 39F
06/01 16:30, 39F
還有 116 則推文
推
06/01 19:57, , 156F
06/01 19:57, 156F
推
06/01 20:06, , 157F
06/01 20:06, 157F
→
06/01 20:07, , 158F
06/01 20:07, 158F
→
06/01 20:07, , 159F
06/01 20:07, 159F
推
06/01 20:17, , 160F
06/01 20:17, 160F
→
06/01 20:17, , 161F
06/01 20:17, 161F
推
06/01 20:21, , 162F
06/01 20:21, 162F
→
06/01 20:21, , 163F
06/01 20:21, 163F
→
06/01 20:21, , 164F
06/01 20:21, 164F
→
06/01 20:21, , 165F
06/01 20:21, 165F
推
06/01 20:22, , 166F
06/01 20:22, 166F
→
06/01 20:22, , 167F
06/01 20:22, 167F
→
06/01 20:23, , 168F
06/01 20:23, 168F
噓
06/01 20:24, , 169F
06/01 20:24, 169F
→
06/01 20:25, , 170F
06/01 20:25, 170F
→
06/01 20:27, , 171F
06/01 20:27, 171F
→
06/01 20:28, , 172F
06/01 20:28, 172F
→
06/01 20:28, , 173F
06/01 20:28, 173F
→
06/01 20:29, , 174F
06/01 20:29, 174F
推
06/01 20:34, , 175F
06/01 20:34, 175F
→
06/01 20:34, , 176F
06/01 20:34, 176F
→
06/01 20:34, , 177F
06/01 20:34, 177F
噓
06/01 20:36, , 178F
06/01 20:36, 178F
→
06/01 22:33, , 179F
06/01 22:33, 179F
→
06/02 00:27, , 180F
06/02 00:27, 180F
推
06/02 00:59, , 181F
06/02 00:59, 181F
→
06/02 02:32, , 182F
06/02 02:32, 182F
推
06/02 06:31, , 183F
06/02 06:31, 183F
→
06/02 09:39, , 184F
06/02 09:39, 184F
推
06/02 09:50, , 185F
06/02 09:50, 185F
→
06/02 09:50, , 186F
06/02 09:50, 186F
推
06/02 11:19, , 187F
06/02 11:19, 187F
→
06/02 11:19, , 188F
06/02 11:19, 188F
推
06/02 12:29, , 189F
06/02 12:29, 189F
推
06/02 12:37, , 190F
06/02 12:37, 190F
噓
06/02 13:57, , 191F
06/02 13:57, 191F
→
06/02 13:58, , 192F
06/02 13:58, 192F
推
06/02 20:16, , 193F
06/02 20:16, 193F
→
06/02 20:16, , 194F
06/02 20:16, 194F
→
06/02 20:16, , 195F
06/02 20:16, 195F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):