Re: [問題] 為什麼HTC系統UI最好? 可是賣這麼爛?
htc sense值5000的年代
對比touchwiz真的是屌打 美觀 易用度
但是常常出一些768M 1.5g ram的旗艦手機
自己的ui又比較肥 就到後期各種卡
朋友的感動機 真的用到崩潰
自己的evo 3d 1g ram也好不到哪去
後來只好刷xda的rom
後來又來一堆高價低規的產品 機海
現在我推人買u11
幾乎都是跟我說 我以前用哪支很難用欸
然後就沒然後了
後來ram 處理器規格補上後
ui越來越精簡 以前的優勢被弭平不少
跟中國品牌比他們本土化根本比不過
跟三星比 touchwiz也沒以前不堪
況且一般人買手機不像鄉民這樣看
不就是外觀 上手那三十秒體驗
oppo利用線下商店會崛起 也是抓準這心態
當然htc這次還是有機會的 在台灣
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.15.32.112
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1496310056.A.56F.html
推
06/01 17:43, , 1F
06/01 17:43, 1F
→
06/01 17:47, , 2F
06/01 17:47, 2F
推
06/01 17:49, , 3F
06/01 17:49, 3F
→
06/01 17:50, , 4F
06/01 17:50, 4F
→
06/01 17:51, , 5F
06/01 17:51, 5F
→
06/01 17:52, , 6F
06/01 17:52, 6F
→
06/01 17:53, , 7F
06/01 17:53, 7F
→
06/01 17:53, , 8F
06/01 17:53, 8F
推
06/01 17:53, , 9F
06/01 17:53, 9F
→
06/01 17:53, , 10F
06/01 17:53, 10F
→
06/01 17:53, , 11F
06/01 17:53, 11F
→
06/01 17:54, , 12F
06/01 17:54, 12F
推
06/01 17:54, , 13F
06/01 17:54, 13F
→
06/01 17:55, , 14F
06/01 17:55, 14F
→
06/01 17:55, , 15F
06/01 17:55, 15F
推
06/01 17:57, , 16F
06/01 17:57, 16F
推
06/01 17:59, , 17F
06/01 17:59, 17F
推
06/01 17:59, , 18F
06/01 17:59, 18F
→
06/01 18:00, , 19F
06/01 18:00, 19F
→
06/01 18:00, , 20F
06/01 18:00, 20F
→
06/01 18:00, , 21F
06/01 18:00, 21F
推
06/01 18:00, , 22F
06/01 18:00, 22F
→
06/01 18:01, , 23F
06/01 18:01, 23F
→
06/01 18:04, , 24F
06/01 18:04, 24F
推
06/01 18:07, , 25F
06/01 18:07, 25F
推
06/01 18:08, , 26F
06/01 18:08, 26F
→
06/01 18:09, , 27F
06/01 18:09, 27F
推
06/01 18:10, , 28F
06/01 18:10, 28F
→
06/01 18:11, , 29F
06/01 18:11, 29F
→
06/01 18:16, , 30F
06/01 18:16, 30F
→
06/01 18:16, , 31F
06/01 18:16, 31F
→
06/01 18:16, , 32F
06/01 18:16, 32F
→
06/01 18:17, , 33F
06/01 18:17, 33F
→
06/01 18:17, , 34F
06/01 18:17, 34F
→
06/01 18:17, , 35F
06/01 18:17, 35F
推
06/01 18:18, , 36F
06/01 18:18, 36F
→
06/01 18:18, , 37F
06/01 18:18, 37F
→
06/01 18:18, , 38F
06/01 18:18, 38F
→
06/01 18:18, , 39F
06/01 18:18, 39F
→
06/01 18:19, , 40F
06/01 18:19, 40F
→
06/01 18:20, , 41F
06/01 18:20, 41F
→
06/01 18:21, , 42F
06/01 18:21, 42F
→
06/01 18:21, , 43F
06/01 18:21, 43F
→
06/01 18:37, , 44F
06/01 18:37, 44F
噓
06/01 18:51, , 45F
06/01 18:51, 45F
推
06/01 18:55, , 46F
06/01 18:55, 46F
→
06/01 19:11, , 47F
06/01 19:11, 47F
→
06/01 19:11, , 48F
06/01 19:11, 48F
→
06/01 19:27, , 49F
06/01 19:27, 49F
→
06/01 19:28, , 50F
06/01 19:28, 50F
→
06/01 19:28, , 51F
06/01 19:28, 51F
推
06/01 20:08, , 52F
06/01 20:08, 52F
推
06/01 20:25, , 53F
06/01 20:25, 53F
→
06/01 20:25, , 54F
06/01 20:25, 54F
推
06/01 20:26, , 55F
06/01 20:26, 55F
推
06/01 21:07, , 56F
06/01 21:07, 56F
→
06/01 21:07, , 57F
06/01 21:07, 57F
推
06/01 21:50, , 58F
06/01 21:50, 58F
推
06/01 22:14, , 59F
06/01 22:14, 59F
→
06/01 22:24, , 60F
06/01 22:24, 60F
推
06/01 22:35, , 61F
06/01 22:35, 61F
推
06/01 23:13, , 62F
06/01 23:13, 62F
→
06/01 23:13, , 63F
06/01 23:13, 63F
推
06/01 23:27, , 64F
06/01 23:27, 64F
→
06/01 23:27, , 65F
06/01 23:27, 65F
噓
06/01 23:32, , 66F
06/01 23:32, 66F
推
06/02 10:01, , 67F
06/02 10:01, 67F
→
06/02 10:01, , 68F
06/02 10:01, 68F
→
06/02 10:43, , 69F
06/02 10:43, 69F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 6 篇):