[情報] 三星看呆!iPhone 7首炸來了:不忍直視..
其實好像也沒說是爆來的
只從圖片上來看也說不定是摔到的 也可能真的是運送途中出包
原始標題也只是說手機有點熱
所以好像也很難判斷是啥事情發生了
只是告訴大家說看起來意外狀況不是這麼的少見(?)
不過如果不知道詳細成因好像也不知道怎麼去避免
http://news.mydrivers.com/1/501/501578.htm
接四連五的Note 7爆炸消息已經看的有些麻木,猝不及防,iPhone 7首炸也來了。
日前,國外網友kroopthesnoop在Reddit論壇發帖,曬出首例iPhone 7爆炸照片。他並未
描述爆炸的詳細時間、地點,只是說“至少包裝沒著火”。
http://img1.mydrivers.com/img/20160929/s_ee487b64ec004e08a42736b6f7df1368.jpg


從照片來看,手機的屏幕和背板已經分裂開,有明顯的灼燒痕跡,已經完全報廢。
有網友問到底發生了什麼,kroopthesnoop回答稱:“ 我不太確定,但肯定是工廠或者運
送途中出了問題 ”。
帖子引來一大波網友熱議,評論你們感受一下:
http://img1.mydrivers.com/img/20160929/s_317e3a3ac3294c7db79ee5fa40b66bfe.jpg

“該死的蘋果,什麼東西都抄襲三星”
“這不是產品缺陷,這是功能特性,擁抱它”
“Note 7用戶的自白:現在你知道我的感受了”
“這又不是iPhone第一次爆炸,有啥稀奇的”
“他們從三星那兒拿的電池嗎?”
...
目前,蘋果尚未對此進行回應。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.138.104.211
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1475156721.A.790.html
推
09/29 21:45, , 1F
09/29 21:45, 1F
推
09/29 21:46, , 2F
09/29 21:46, 2F
推
09/29 21:46, , 3F
09/29 21:46, 3F
推
09/29 21:47, , 4F
09/29 21:47, 4F
推
09/29 21:47, , 5F
09/29 21:47, 5F
※ 編輯: Lsamia (223.138.104.211), 09/29/2016 21:48:13
推
09/29 21:48, , 6F
09/29 21:48, 6F
推
09/29 21:48, , 7F
09/29 21:48, 7F
→
09/29 21:49, , 8F
09/29 21:49, 8F
推
09/29 21:49, , 9F
09/29 21:49, 9F
→
09/29 21:49, , 10F
09/29 21:49, 10F
推
09/29 21:49, , 11F
09/29 21:49, 11F
推
09/29 21:49, , 12F
09/29 21:49, 12F
推
09/29 21:49, , 13F
09/29 21:49, 13F
推
09/29 21:49, , 14F
09/29 21:49, 14F
推
09/29 21:50, , 15F
09/29 21:50, 15F
推
09/29 21:51, , 16F
09/29 21:51, 16F
推
09/29 21:51, , 17F
09/29 21:51, 17F
推
09/29 21:51, , 18F
09/29 21:51, 18F
推
09/29 21:52, , 19F
09/29 21:52, 19F
推
09/29 21:53, , 20F
09/29 21:53, 20F
推
09/29 21:53, , 21F
09/29 21:53, 21F
推
09/29 21:53, , 22F
09/29 21:53, 22F
推
09/29 21:53, , 23F
09/29 21:53, 23F
推
09/29 21:54, , 24F
09/29 21:54, 24F
推
09/29 21:54, , 25F
09/29 21:54, 25F
推
09/29 21:54, , 26F
09/29 21:54, 26F
→
09/29 21:56, , 27F
09/29 21:56, 27F
推
09/29 21:57, , 28F
09/29 21:57, 28F
推
09/29 21:58, , 29F
09/29 21:58, 29F
→
09/29 21:58, , 30F
09/29 21:58, 30F
→
09/29 21:58, , 31F
09/29 21:58, 31F
推
09/29 22:00, , 32F
09/29 22:00, 32F
→
09/29 22:01, , 33F
09/29 22:01, 33F
推
09/29 22:04, , 34F
09/29 22:04, 34F
推
09/29 22:04, , 35F
09/29 22:04, 35F
推
09/29 22:05, , 36F
09/29 22:05, 36F
→
09/29 22:05, , 37F
09/29 22:05, 37F
推
09/29 22:06, , 38F
09/29 22:06, 38F
還有 93 則推文
推
09/30 01:02, , 132F
09/30 01:02, 132F
推
09/30 01:17, , 133F
09/30 01:17, 133F
推
09/30 01:20, , 134F
09/30 01:20, 134F
推
09/30 01:31, , 135F
09/30 01:31, 135F
→
09/30 01:31, , 136F
09/30 01:31, 136F
推
09/30 01:36, , 137F
09/30 01:36, 137F
→
09/30 01:36, , 138F
09/30 01:36, 138F
→
09/30 01:36, , 139F
09/30 01:36, 139F
推
09/30 01:50, , 140F
09/30 01:50, 140F
推
09/30 01:56, , 141F
09/30 01:56, 141F
推
09/30 02:06, , 142F
09/30 02:06, 142F
推
09/30 02:18, , 143F
09/30 02:18, 143F
→
09/30 02:18, , 144F
09/30 02:18, 144F
推
09/30 02:21, , 145F
09/30 02:21, 145F
推
09/30 02:30, , 146F
09/30 02:30, 146F
→
09/30 02:43, , 147F
09/30 02:43, 147F
推
09/30 03:44, , 148F
09/30 03:44, 148F
推
09/30 06:25, , 149F
09/30 06:25, 149F
→
09/30 07:21, , 150F
09/30 07:21, 150F
推
09/30 07:25, , 151F
09/30 07:25, 151F
→
09/30 07:25, , 152F
09/30 07:25, 152F
→
09/30 07:25, , 153F
09/30 07:25, 153F
→
09/30 08:24, , 154F
09/30 08:24, 154F
推
09/30 08:37, , 155F
09/30 08:37, 155F
推
09/30 08:40, , 156F
09/30 08:40, 156F
推
09/30 08:46, , 157F
09/30 08:46, 157F

推
09/30 10:01, , 158F
09/30 10:01, 158F
推
09/30 10:23, , 159F
09/30 10:23, 159F
噓
09/30 10:58, , 160F
09/30 10:58, 160F
→
09/30 11:43, , 161F
09/30 11:43, 161F
→
09/30 12:38, , 162F
09/30 12:38, 162F
推
09/30 12:44, , 163F
09/30 12:44, 163F
推
09/30 12:46, , 164F
09/30 12:46, 164F
推
09/30 13:00, , 165F
09/30 13:00, 165F
推
09/30 13:25, , 166F
09/30 13:25, 166F
推
09/30 14:17, , 167F
09/30 14:17, 167F
→
09/30 14:17, , 168F
09/30 14:17, 168F
推
09/30 14:20, , 169F
09/30 14:20, 169F

→
09/30 14:20, , 170F
09/30 14:20, 170F
推
09/30 16:13, , 171F
09/30 16:13, 171F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):