[閒聊] 都沒有三星Note 7展示機爆炸?這很奇怪?
最近三星Note 7爆炸的消息 相信大家在新聞上都看得到
就連號稱沒問題的中國「國行版」都出現災情
不過你們不覺得有一件事情很奇怪嗎?
這些聲稱疑似會爆炸的Note 7,都是在個人手上出現問題的
說難聽一點,使用者要事先在手機上做些什麼手腳(例如:充電時故意製造可能的短路情
況、在太陽底下長期曝曬過熱、不破壞外觀的摔機製造內傷等等)
刻意的做起來像是個意外,但是又很難查證的情況(都燒掉了,事後也看不出來)
不要說這是什麼無腦的陰謀論,我認為還是有這種可能性的
你們或許覺得可能性很低,大家沒事不會這麼無聊,但機率並不是0
尤其三星在安卓界算是龍頭地位,對手不只安卓陣營,還有對面iOS陣營強大的蘋果公司
大家想幹掉三星是可想而知的,尤其中國廠的崛起使得行動裝置競爭更為激烈
那既然Note 7如傳聞中那麼危險,照理說最有可能會出現問題的應該是展示機
在展場待過的應該都知道,展示機的耗損是非常可怕的
被無數人操過把玩過,可能還會必屁孩摔到敲到
特別是這次的問題是爆炸,不是甚麼LAG、死機的情況
展示機又是長期接上電源螢幕又常亮,加上邊充電邊使用,應該是風險最高的
結果咧?展示機爆炸的案例,據我所知,1件都沒有
配合著媒體見獵心喜,每天不停的炒作
這年代廠商買新聞業配也不是什麼新鮮事了
你們就這麼單純相信三星爆炸門沒有陰謀論嗎?
至少我是不相信啦
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.167.97.134
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1475136868.A.EF4.html
→
09/29 16:15, , 1F
09/29 16:15, 1F
→
09/29 16:15, , 2F
09/29 16:15, 2F
噓
09/29 16:15, , 3F
09/29 16:15, 3F
推
09/29 16:16, , 4F
09/29 16:16, 4F
推
09/29 16:16, , 5F
09/29 16:16, 5F
→
09/29 16:16, , 6F
09/29 16:16, 6F
→
09/29 16:17, , 7F
09/29 16:17, 7F
→
09/29 16:17, , 8F
09/29 16:17, 8F
→
09/29 16:17, , 9F
09/29 16:17, 9F
→
09/29 16:17, , 10F
09/29 16:17, 10F
→
09/29 16:17, , 11F
09/29 16:17, 11F
→
09/29 16:17, , 12F
09/29 16:17, 12F
→
09/29 16:17, , 13F
09/29 16:17, 13F
推
09/29 16:18, , 14F
09/29 16:18, 14F
噓
09/29 16:18, , 15F
09/29 16:18, 15F
→
09/29 16:18, , 16F
09/29 16:18, 16F
→
09/29 16:19, , 17F
09/29 16:19, 17F
→
09/29 16:19, , 18F
09/29 16:19, 18F
噓
09/29 16:20, , 19F
09/29 16:20, 19F
推
09/29 16:22, , 20F
09/29 16:22, 20F
→
09/29 16:23, , 21F
09/29 16:23, 21F
→
09/29 16:23, , 22F
09/29 16:23, 22F
→
09/29 16:23, , 23F
09/29 16:23, 23F
推
09/29 16:23, , 24F
09/29 16:23, 24F
推
09/29 16:23, , 25F
09/29 16:23, 25F
→
09/29 16:23, , 26F
09/29 16:23, 26F
→
09/29 16:24, , 27F
09/29 16:24, 27F
→
09/29 16:24, , 28F
09/29 16:24, 28F
噓
09/29 16:25, , 29F
09/29 16:25, 29F
噓
09/29 16:25, , 30F
09/29 16:25, 30F
→
09/29 16:25, , 31F
09/29 16:25, 31F
噓
09/29 16:29, , 32F
09/29 16:29, 32F
→
09/29 16:31, , 33F
09/29 16:31, 33F
推
09/29 16:33, , 34F
09/29 16:33, 34F
→
09/29 16:33, , 35F
09/29 16:33, 35F
→
09/29 16:33, , 36F
09/29 16:33, 36F
推
09/29 16:33, , 37F
09/29 16:33, 37F
推
09/29 16:33, , 38F
09/29 16:33, 38F
→
09/29 16:33, , 39F
09/29 16:33, 39F
還有 321 則推文
→
09/29 20:25, , 361F
09/29 20:25, 361F
→
09/29 20:56, , 362F
09/29 20:56, 362F
→
09/29 20:56, , 363F
09/29 20:56, 363F
噓
09/29 21:01, , 364F
09/29 21:01, 364F
推
09/29 21:04, , 365F
09/29 21:04, 365F
推
09/29 21:06, , 366F
09/29 21:06, 366F
→
09/29 21:06, , 367F
09/29 21:06, 367F
→
09/29 21:07, , 368F
09/29 21:07, 368F
→
09/29 21:08, , 369F
09/29 21:08, 369F
→
09/29 21:08, , 370F
09/29 21:08, 370F
→
09/29 21:09, , 371F
09/29 21:09, 371F
→
09/29 21:09, , 372F
09/29 21:09, 372F
推
09/29 21:10, , 373F
09/29 21:10, 373F
推
09/29 21:12, , 374F
09/29 21:12, 374F
→
09/29 21:12, , 375F
09/29 21:12, 375F
推
09/29 21:13, , 376F
09/29 21:13, 376F
→
09/29 21:13, , 377F
09/29 21:13, 377F
→
09/29 21:13, , 378F
09/29 21:13, 378F
→
09/29 21:16, , 379F
09/29 21:16, 379F
→
09/29 21:16, , 380F
09/29 21:16, 380F
推
09/29 21:18, , 381F
09/29 21:18, 381F
→
09/29 21:18, , 382F
09/29 21:18, 382F
→
09/29 21:18, , 383F
09/29 21:18, 383F
→
09/29 21:28, , 384F
09/29 21:28, 384F
→
09/29 21:29, , 385F
09/29 21:29, 385F
→
09/29 21:29, , 386F
09/29 21:29, 386F
→
09/29 21:30, , 387F
09/29 21:30, 387F
噓
09/29 21:35, , 388F
09/29 21:35, 388F
噓
09/29 21:38, , 389F
09/29 21:38, 389F
→
09/29 21:39, , 390F
09/29 21:39, 390F
推
09/29 21:50, , 391F
09/29 21:50, 391F
→
09/29 21:51, , 392F
09/29 21:51, 392F
→
09/29 21:51, , 393F
09/29 21:51, 393F
推
09/29 22:08, , 394F
09/29 22:08, 394F
推
09/29 22:51, , 395F
09/29 22:51, 395F
推
09/30 00:45, , 396F
09/30 00:45, 396F
→
10/01 10:15, , 397F
10/01 10:15, 397F
噓
10/08 09:54, , 398F
10/08 09:54, 398F
→
10/08 09:54, , 399F
10/08 09:54, 399F
噓
10/12 11:54, , 400F
10/12 11:54, 400F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):