Re: [閒聊] 為了c/p值,冒險拼人品到底是為什麼?消失
※ 引述《gk1329 ()》之銘言:
: 因為貴的也是有問題
: 又不是貴的就不用拼人品
: 三星會爆炸
: 蘋果電死人
: HTC紫光
: 相形之下
: 感覺買便宜的
: 有問題或摔壞
: 再買一隻就好
: 也不用修來修去的
我不反對 買CP值高的 或是同規格較便宜的
可是你舉的例子 實在是可以好好討論一下
三星會爆炸 apple電死人
這些大廠 賣出幾隻手機 出問題的有多少?
我覺得討論一個問題之前 都需要列出相關數據 良率 返修率等等..
電子產品 賣出幾千萬台 要這幾千萬台都不出包 實在是不可能
但出包頻繁 還去買他 這叫____。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.227.111.227
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/MobileComm/M.1400210353.A.809.html
推
05/16 11:25, , 1F
05/16 11:25, 1F
推
05/16 11:28, , 2F
05/16 11:28, 2F
推
05/16 11:29, , 3F
05/16 11:29, 3F
推
05/16 11:31, , 4F
05/16 11:31, 4F
→
05/16 11:34, , 5F
05/16 11:34, 5F
→
05/16 11:35, , 6F
05/16 11:35, 6F
推
05/16 11:41, , 7F
05/16 11:41, 7F
推
05/16 11:46, , 8F
05/16 11:46, 8F
推
05/16 11:46, , 9F
05/16 11:46, 9F
→
05/16 11:47, , 10F
05/16 11:47, 10F
推
05/16 11:48, , 11F
05/16 11:48, 11F
→
05/16 11:49, , 12F
05/16 11:49, 12F
推
05/16 11:49, , 13F
05/16 11:49, 13F
→
05/16 11:53, , 14F
05/16 11:53, 14F
→
05/16 11:53, , 15F
05/16 11:53, 15F
→
05/16 11:53, , 16F
05/16 11:53, 16F
推
05/16 11:53, , 17F
05/16 11:53, 17F
推
05/16 11:56, , 18F
05/16 11:56, 18F
→
05/16 11:57, , 19F
05/16 11:57, 19F
→
05/16 11:57, , 20F
05/16 11:57, 20F
推
05/16 12:04, , 21F
05/16 12:04, 21F
→
05/16 12:49, , 22F
05/16 12:49, 22F
→
05/16 12:50, , 23F
05/16 12:50, 23F
推
05/16 13:12, , 24F
05/16 13:12, 24F
→
05/16 13:13, , 25F
05/16 13:13, 25F
→
05/16 13:19, , 26F
05/16 13:19, 26F
→
05/16 13:20, , 27F
05/16 13:20, 27F
→
05/16 13:29, , 28F
05/16 13:29, 28F
→
05/16 13:37, , 29F
05/16 13:37, 29F
推
05/16 13:47, , 30F
05/16 13:47, 30F
推
05/16 14:30, , 31F
05/16 14:30, 31F
→
05/16 14:31, , 32F
05/16 14:31, 32F
→
05/16 14:32, , 33F
05/16 14:32, 33F
推
05/16 14:33, , 34F
05/16 14:33, 34F
→
05/16 14:34, , 35F
05/16 14:34, 35F
→
05/16 14:48, , 36F
05/16 14:48, 36F
→
05/16 14:48, , 37F
05/16 14:48, 37F
→
05/16 14:50, , 38F
05/16 14:50, 38F
推
05/16 16:31, , 39F
05/16 16:31, 39F
推
05/16 16:50, , 40F
05/16 16:50, 40F
→
05/16 18:12, , 41F
05/16 18:12, 41F
→
05/16 18:13, , 42F
05/16 18:13, 42F
→
08/18 07:39, , 43F
08/18 07:39, 43F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 5 篇):