Re: [討論] BFZ感想
看板Magic作者RealJustice (Nice to Meet You~)時間8年前 (2015/09/22 12:07)推噓48(50推 2噓 118→)留言170則, 33人參與討論串4/10 (看更多)
※ 引述《cycefa (莉蓮娜鐵粉 希司法)》之銘言:
: ※ 引述《westwade (秋思化刃)》之銘言:
: 所以出個全圖地樂透來騙人氣,這樣玩家就會買單了吧?
: 雖然我個人認為是B的可能性大點...
: 但不管是A或B哪一種,都只感覺得到WOTC的惡意...
: 老實說一些老牌咖在磨拳擦掌的肖想全圖地、或是討論哪張牌在EDH可以用
: 我的危機意識一直在想哪接下來的標準怎麼辨?
: 接下來我要怎麼說服已經入坑幾個月的人說這是個好系列值得一開?
: (新手)
: 個人對BFZ的感想:
: U卡很多可用之兵,絕對能撐起來好幾個套牌的主軸。
: 但是U卡就是U卡,不會有什麼價
: 這是一個可以玩(不算強),但是卡片普遍沒有什麼價值的系列...
: 不過還是得為了地牌用力給他開下去.....
: 順帶一提,新的雙色地感覺又是一個很故意,就是故意做成標準可用還能配找地地
: 但是又讓現代薪傳古典看不上的的東西....各種微妙..
亂入一下, 很久沒玩了, 可是看這文章覺得很有趣.
"U卡很多可用之兵,絕對能撐起來好幾個套牌的主軸",
所以新手能夠花少少的錢買到強卡, 買到套牌主軸, 這樣有甚麼好抱怨的?
強卡一定要做成R甚至MR, 然後一張幾百上千, 要有競爭力的構築一定要上萬塊,
這樣才是好系列 ???
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 61.219.69.157
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Magic/M.1442894879.A.C2D.html
→
09/22 12:33, , 1F
09/22 12:33, 1F
噓
09/22 12:37, , 2F
09/22 12:37, 2F
→
09/22 12:41, , 3F
09/22 12:41, 3F
→
09/22 12:46, , 4F
09/22 12:46, 4F
→
09/22 12:53, , 5F
09/22 12:53, 5F
推
09/22 13:06, , 6F
09/22 13:06, 6F
→
09/22 13:07, , 7F
09/22 13:07, 7F
→
09/22 13:08, , 8F
09/22 13:08, 8F
→
09/22 13:08, , 9F
09/22 13:08, 9F
推
09/22 13:11, , 10F
09/22 13:11, 10F
推
09/22 13:11, , 11F
09/22 13:11, 11F
→
09/22 13:11, , 12F
09/22 13:11, 12F
→
09/22 13:12, , 13F
09/22 13:12, 13F
→
09/22 13:14, , 14F
09/22 13:14, 14F
→
09/22 13:52, , 15F
09/22 13:52, 15F
→
09/22 13:52, , 16F
09/22 13:52, 16F
推
09/22 14:09, , 17F
09/22 14:09, 17F
推
09/22 14:10, , 18F
09/22 14:10, 18F
推
09/22 14:11, , 19F
09/22 14:11, 19F
→
09/22 14:11, , 20F
09/22 14:11, 20F
推
09/22 14:12, , 21F
09/22 14:12, 21F
→
09/22 14:23, , 22F
09/22 14:23, 22F
推
09/22 14:33, , 23F
09/22 14:33, 23F
→
09/22 14:33, , 24F
09/22 14:33, 24F
→
09/22 14:48, , 25F
09/22 14:48, 25F
→
09/22 14:48, , 26F
09/22 14:48, 26F
→
09/22 14:50, , 27F
09/22 14:50, 27F
→
09/22 15:02, , 28F
09/22 15:02, 28F
→
09/22 15:02, , 29F
09/22 15:02, 29F
→
09/22 15:03, , 30F
09/22 15:03, 30F
→
09/22 15:03, , 31F
09/22 15:03, 31F
→
09/22 15:06, , 32F
09/22 15:06, 32F
→
09/22 15:07, , 33F
09/22 15:07, 33F
→
09/22 15:09, , 34F
09/22 15:09, 34F
→
09/22 15:09, , 35F
09/22 15:09, 35F
推
09/22 15:12, , 36F
09/22 15:12, 36F
推
09/22 15:36, , 37F
09/22 15:36, 37F
→
09/22 15:36, , 38F
09/22 15:36, 38F
→
09/22 15:36, , 39F
09/22 15:36, 39F
還有 91 則推文
還有 2 段內文
→
09/23 14:06, , 131F
09/23 14:06, 131F
推
09/23 14:50, , 132F
09/23 14:50, 132F
推
09/23 14:55, , 133F
09/23 14:55, 133F
→
09/23 14:55, , 134F
09/23 14:55, 134F
→
09/23 14:56, , 135F
09/23 14:56, 135F
推
09/23 14:59, , 136F
09/23 14:59, 136F
→
09/23 14:59, , 137F
09/23 14:59, 137F
→
09/23 15:05, , 138F
09/23 15:05, 138F
→
09/23 15:05, , 139F
09/23 15:05, 139F
推
09/23 15:06, , 140F
09/23 15:06, 140F
→
09/23 15:07, , 141F
09/23 15:07, 141F
→
09/23 15:08, , 142F
09/23 15:08, 142F
推
09/23 15:09, , 143F
09/23 15:09, 143F
→
09/23 15:09, , 144F
09/23 15:09, 144F
推
09/23 15:13, , 145F
09/23 15:13, 145F
→
09/23 15:13, , 146F
09/23 15:13, 146F
→
09/23 15:13, , 147F
09/23 15:13, 147F
→
09/23 15:17, , 148F
09/23 15:17, 148F
→
09/23 15:18, , 149F
09/23 15:18, 149F
→
09/23 15:19, , 150F
09/23 15:19, 150F
→
09/23 15:19, , 151F
09/23 15:19, 151F
→
09/23 15:21, , 152F
09/23 15:21, 152F
→
09/23 16:39, , 153F
09/23 16:39, 153F
推
09/23 16:53, , 154F
09/23 16:53, 154F
推
09/23 17:11, , 155F
09/23 17:11, 155F
推
09/23 18:20, , 156F
09/23 18:20, 156F
推
09/23 18:20, , 157F
09/23 18:20, 157F
→
09/23 18:21, , 158F
09/23 18:21, 158F
→
09/23 18:23, , 159F
09/23 18:23, 159F
推
09/23 18:27, , 160F
09/23 18:27, 160F
→
09/23 18:28, , 161F
09/23 18:28, 161F
→
09/23 18:48, , 162F
09/23 18:48, 162F
→
09/23 18:48, , 163F
09/23 18:48, 163F
→
09/23 18:48, , 164F
09/23 18:48, 164F
→
09/23 18:48, , 165F
09/23 18:48, 165F
→
09/23 18:49, , 166F
09/23 18:49, 166F
推
09/23 18:54, , 167F
09/23 18:54, 167F
推
09/23 18:57, , 168F
09/23 18:57, 168F
→
09/23 19:59, , 169F
09/23 19:59, 169F
→
09/24 00:22, , 170F
09/24 00:22, 170F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
討論
34
76
以下文章回應了本文:
討論
12
25
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 10 篇):
討論
9
18
討論
10
21
討論
34
76
討論
48
170
討論
7
14
討論
4
10
討論
12
25
討論
39
107
討論
3
4
討論
17
45