Re: [問題] 觸發效應敘述中包含"if"的情況

看板Magic作者marssss (算不完的MC)時間12年前 (2012/07/26 19:50)推噓8(8推 0噓 12→)

留言20則, 7人參與討論串4/6 (看更多)

※ 引述《tinyfan (小風扇)》之銘言： : ※ 引述《mikemai0080 (mike)》之銘言： : ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ : 所以這兩者是不同的嗎? : 另外完整規則 : 603.4. A triggered ability may read “When/Whenever/At [trigger event], : if [condition], [effect].” When the trigger event occurs, the ability : checks whether the stated condition is true. The ability triggers : only if it is; otherwise it does nothing. If the ability triggers, : it checks the stated condition again as it resolves. : If the condition isn’t true at that time, the ability is : removed from the stack and does nothing. Note that this : mirrors the check for legal targets. This rule is referred : to as the “intervening ‘if’ clause” rule. : (The word “if” has only its normal English meaning anywhere else : in the text of a card; this rule only applies to an “if” that : immediately follows a trigger condition.) : 最後括號中的敘述是說if後面跟的就是觸發條件? 兩者是不同的 ()內的簡單來說, "if"這個單字作為"規則"處理的條件是接在觸發條件之後看看英文的敘述鬥智是 At the beginning of your upkeep, if you have 200 or more cards in your library, you win the game. "在你的維持開始時，[若]你的牌庫中有200張或更多的牌，你便贏得此盤遊戲。" 戒指是 At the beginning of your upkeep, put a +1/+1 counter on equipped creature if it's white. "在你的維持開始時，如果佩帶此武具的生物為白色，則在其上放置一個+1/+1指示物。" 也就是說 "if"這個單字在鬥智視為"規則" 而在戒指中只視為一般敘述，所以不符合上述文章的if的堆疊處理等規則也就是說中文的牌敘述上話if有沒有接在觸發條件後用的是不同敘述沒看到"若"就不用當規則處理了...吧? 可能要多找一些例子來看 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.28.219 ※ 編輯: marssss 來自: 140.112.28.219 (07/26 19:53)

推

NaZiTiGer

07/26 19:52, , 1^F

07/26 19:52, 1^F

推

tinyfan

07/26 19:53, , 2^F

07/26 19:53, 2^F

推

Hevak

07/26 20:04, , 3^F

07/26 20:04, 3^F