[問題] LOL前十場機制是不是做壞了?消失
上季有上過金牌
不過結算的時候似乎是銀牌(銀一)
昨天花一整天打完前十場,沒有一場贏過
稽查過了,每一場都有兩個人以上練腳(幾乎都是0分開戳)
恩,反正我牌位在銅二
剛剛又打了兩場,對手與我方牌位幾乎都是銀四到銅一之間
然後我都選上路把對面打穿,最後結算都+28分
我認為這個前十場機制有很大的問題,
已經不是低估牌位了,並且會造成一些惡性循環
例如我,打這些場,讓一些人掉牌,然後那些人又讓另一些人掉牌
無限循環,這機制是不是做壞了?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.121.77.93
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1522979303.A.9BA.html
推
04/06 09:50, , 1F
04/06 09:50, 1F
我一定可以打上銀牌阿,我認為這機制真的很有問題
舉例:跟我在一隊的中路牙膏被打爆都能加28分上分
打爆牙膏的中路只能扣分下去,牙膏上去繼續戳人,中路下去繼續像我一樣虐
又在無線循環了QQ
推
04/06 09:51, , 2F
04/06 09:51, 2F
※ 編輯: mHRUed (122.121.77.93), 04/06/2018 09:54:28
噓
04/06 09:52, , 3F
04/06 09:52, 3F
→
04/06 09:54, , 4F
04/06 09:54, 4F
噓
04/06 09:54, , 5F
04/06 09:54, 5F
噓
04/06 09:54, , 6F
04/06 09:54, 6F
推
04/06 09:54, , 7F
04/06 09:54, 7F
推
04/06 09:54, , 8F
04/06 09:54, 8F
推
04/06 09:55, , 9F
04/06 09:55, 9F
推
04/06 09:56, , 10F
04/06 09:56, 10F
我的意思是要讓牌位跟實力相符
推
04/06 09:56, , 11F
04/06 09:56, 11F
推
04/06 09:57, , 12F
04/06 09:57, 12F
※ 編輯: mHRUed (122.121.77.93), 04/06/2018 09:58:27
推
04/06 09:58, , 13F
04/06 09:58, 13F
推
04/06 09:58, , 14F
04/06 09:58, 14F
→
04/06 09:58, , 15F
04/06 09:58, 15F
噓
04/06 09:58, , 16F
04/06 09:58, 16F
→
04/06 09:59, , 17F
04/06 09:59, 17F
→
04/06 09:59, , 18F
04/06 09:59, 18F
噓
04/06 10:00, , 19F
04/06 10:00, 19F
→
04/06 10:00, , 20F
04/06 10:00, 20F
→
04/06 10:00, , 21F
04/06 10:00, 21F
HI,即便我實力不到金牌好了,不過至少我也有銀一實力
系統把我分到銅牌,會讓實力造成不平均,我一個人這樣,十個這樣
這樣積分機制會不平均
像我這兩場對手"牌位"都比我這銅二高並且拿出專精腳色被我打爆==
※ 編輯: mHRUed (122.121.77.93), 04/06/2018 10:03:37
推
04/06 10:01, , 22F
04/06 10:01, 22F
→
04/06 10:01, , 23F
04/06 10:01, 23F
→
04/06 10:02, , 24F
04/06 10:02, 24F
→
04/06 10:02, , 25F
04/06 10:02, 25F
→
04/06 10:03, , 26F
04/06 10:03, 26F
噓
04/06 10:03, , 27F
04/06 10:03, 27F
→
04/06 10:04, , 28F
04/06 10:04, 28F
→
04/06 10:04, , 29F
04/06 10:04, 29F
→
04/06 10:05, , 30F
04/06 10:05, 30F
→
04/06 10:05, , 31F
04/06 10:05, 31F
我牌位目前銅二打爆對面銀牌5專精7腳色,反觀我們對中路被打爆依舊往上加分
上去戳人,讓原本能上去的人往下,這就造成問題
就像是連鎖反應一樣阿
※ 編輯: mHRUed (122.121.77.93), 04/06/2018 10:08:03
→
04/06 10:06, , 32F
04/06 10:06, 32F
推
04/06 10:06, , 33F
04/06 10:06, 33F
還有 81 則推文
還有 6 段內文
→
04/06 12:10, , 115F
04/06 12:10, 115F
噓
04/06 12:10, , 116F
04/06 12:10, 116F
→
04/06 12:10, , 117F
04/06 12:10, 117F
噓
04/06 12:13, , 118F
04/06 12:13, 118F
噓
04/06 12:19, , 119F
04/06 12:19, 119F
→
04/06 12:20, , 120F
04/06 12:20, 120F
推
04/06 12:21, , 121F
04/06 12:21, 121F
推
04/06 12:23, , 122F
04/06 12:23, 122F
→
04/06 12:26, , 123F
04/06 12:26, 123F
噓
04/06 12:28, , 124F
04/06 12:28, 124F
噓
04/06 12:31, , 125F
04/06 12:31, 125F
推
04/06 12:36, , 126F
04/06 12:36, 126F
推
04/06 12:47, , 127F
04/06 12:47, 127F
噓
04/06 12:48, , 128F
04/06 12:48, 128F
噓
04/06 12:50, , 129F
04/06 12:50, 129F
噓
04/06 12:50, , 130F
04/06 12:50, 130F
推
04/06 12:52, , 131F
04/06 12:52, 131F
→
04/06 12:52, , 132F
04/06 12:52, 132F
噓
04/06 12:53, , 133F
04/06 12:53, 133F
→
04/06 12:59, , 134F
04/06 12:59, 134F
→
04/06 12:59, , 135F
04/06 12:59, 135F
→
04/06 12:59, , 136F
04/06 12:59, 136F
噓
04/06 13:03, , 137F
04/06 13:03, 137F
推
04/06 13:06, , 138F
04/06 13:06, 138F
噓
04/06 13:07, , 139F
04/06 13:07, 139F
→
04/06 13:07, , 140F
04/06 13:07, 140F
→
04/06 13:13, , 141F
04/06 13:13, 141F
→
04/06 13:13, , 142F
04/06 13:13, 142F
推
04/06 13:28, , 143F
04/06 13:28, 143F
推
04/06 13:36, , 144F
04/06 13:36, 144F
→
04/06 13:37, , 145F
04/06 13:37, 145F
噓
04/06 13:50, , 146F
04/06 13:50, 146F
噓
04/06 13:55, , 147F
04/06 13:55, 147F
→
04/06 13:56, , 148F
04/06 13:56, 148F
噓
04/06 15:07, , 149F
04/06 15:07, 149F
推
04/06 15:20, , 150F
04/06 15:20, 150F
噓
04/06 16:21, , 151F
04/06 16:21, 151F
噓
04/06 18:32, , 152F
04/06 18:32, 152F
→
04/06 18:32, , 153F
04/06 18:32, 153F
噓
04/06 22:03, , 154F
04/06 22:03, 154F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):