[閒聊] AHQ 買來Chawy的真正目的是藏招嗎 ?
看完了這一系列賽
發現AHQ 從對上閃電狼開始
即使被FW逆轉以3比2 落敗 也沒有派Chawy上場
搶最後一張世界賽門票
對上HKE 還有 M17 也都沒有派Chawy上場的打算
這樣總感覺不太合理阿,好歹Chawy也是Riot世界賽宣傳影片的封面人物
花錢把選手買過來、卻又不給他上場
唯一能合理化的理由就是AHQ在藏招
所以AHQ目前是在藏招嗎 ? 否則為什麼不給Chawy上場 ?
還是西門 比 Chawy好用 ?
人家好歹也是宣傳影片的封面人物、不給點面子 ??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.161.111.165
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1473000408.A.1B4.html
→
09/04 22:47, , 1F
09/04 22:47, 1F
→
09/04 22:47, , 2F
09/04 22:47, 2F
推
09/04 22:47, , 3F
09/04 22:47, 3F
推
09/04 22:47, , 4F
09/04 22:47, 4F
推
09/04 22:47, , 5F
09/04 22:47, 5F
→
09/04 22:47, , 6F
09/04 22:47, 6F
推
09/04 22:48, , 7F
09/04 22:48, 7F
推
09/04 22:48, , 8F
09/04 22:48, 8F
推
09/04 22:48, , 9F
09/04 22:48, 9F
→
09/04 22:48, , 10F
09/04 22:48, 10F
推
09/04 22:48, , 11F
09/04 22:48, 11F
推
09/04 22:49, , 12F
09/04 22:49, 12F
→
09/04 22:49, , 13F
09/04 22:49, 13F
推
09/04 22:49, , 14F
09/04 22:49, 14F
推
09/04 22:50, , 15F
09/04 22:50, 15F
推
09/04 22:50, , 16F
09/04 22:50, 16F
→
09/04 22:50, , 17F
09/04 22:50, 17F
→
09/04 22:50, , 18F
09/04 22:50, 18F
→
09/04 22:50, , 19F
09/04 22:50, 19F
推
09/04 22:50, , 20F
09/04 22:50, 20F
推
09/04 22:51, , 21F
09/04 22:51, 21F
推
09/04 22:52, , 22F
09/04 22:52, 22F
推
09/04 22:52, , 23F
09/04 22:52, 23F
推
09/04 22:52, , 24F
09/04 22:52, 24F
推
09/04 22:52, , 25F
09/04 22:52, 25F
→
09/04 22:53, , 26F
09/04 22:53, 26F
噓
09/04 22:53, , 27F
09/04 22:53, 27F
推
09/04 22:53, , 28F
09/04 22:53, 28F
推
09/04 22:54, , 29F
09/04 22:54, 29F
→
09/04 22:55, , 30F
09/04 22:55, 30F
推
09/04 22:56, , 31F
09/04 22:56, 31F
推
09/04 22:56, , 32F
09/04 22:56, 32F
推
09/04 22:56, , 33F
09/04 22:56, 33F
推
09/04 22:57, , 34F
09/04 22:57, 34F
→
09/04 22:57, , 35F
09/04 22:57, 35F
→
09/04 22:57, , 36F
09/04 22:57, 36F
推
09/04 22:58, , 37F
09/04 22:58, 37F
推
09/04 22:59, , 38F
09/04 22:59, 38F
推
09/04 23:00, , 39F
09/04 23:00, 39F
推
09/04 23:00, , 40F
09/04 23:00, 40F
→
09/04 23:01, , 41F
09/04 23:01, 41F
→
09/04 23:07, , 42F
09/04 23:07, 42F
推
09/04 23:08, , 43F
09/04 23:08, 43F
→
09/04 23:11, , 44F
09/04 23:11, 44F
→
09/04 23:11, , 45F
09/04 23:11, 45F
噓
09/04 23:13, , 46F
09/04 23:13, 46F
→
09/04 23:13, , 47F
09/04 23:13, 47F
推
09/04 23:14, , 48F
09/04 23:14, 48F
→
09/04 23:14, , 49F
09/04 23:14, 49F
推
09/04 23:17, , 50F
09/04 23:17, 50F
→
09/04 23:28, , 51F
09/04 23:28, 51F
推
09/04 23:32, , 52F
09/04 23:32, 52F
推
09/05 00:20, , 53F
09/05 00:20, 53F
推
09/05 00:39, , 54F
09/05 00:39, 54F
推
09/05 02:52, , 55F
09/05 02:52, 55F
→
09/05 02:52, , 56F
09/05 02:52, 56F
→
09/05 13:15, , 57F
09/05 13:15, 57F
→
09/05 16:21, , 58F
09/05 16:21, 58F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):