Re: [閒聊] MAPLE的選角是不是有改進空間?消失
※ 引述《smalljon2010 (猴強)》之銘言:
: 阿奇爾->沒話說,壓暴死哥,所以後面都沒得用了
: 蛇女->非主流中路角色,破大男陣用,但效果不佳
: 烏爾加特->不想給對面AD用,自家AD不會用
: 吸血鬼->可以壓線,但是隊團戰影響力不足
: 簡單來說MAPLE今晚的比賽,非主流角色太多沒造成奇襲
: 反而造成反效果尤其是第四場明明能先選飛斯,卻放給西門
: 雖然吃兵數贏線,會戰的價值輸了一大節
: 同時我想MAPLE也是今晚最悶的一位
: 配合隊伍,硬選了會玩但並不是最精銳的角色
: 重點還輸了比賽...
maple每一場幾乎都在線上壓制了西門
只有第二場的選角 西門的逆命真的有點太戰術性了
還沒正式的大團戰前就先把下路打爆
第三場的蛇女應該說是JG造成的差異
否則被殺過的蛇女 CS還是不輸劫
第四場選吸血鬼也算是主流英雄
線上也是屌壓
但是會戰時真正人數相同且正面碰撞的次數其實不多
開始比較對等碰撞都是ahq拉開經濟以後的事情
ahq前兩天的小龍攻勢讓也很會搶小龍的FW注重小龍戰
但是除去小山偷到小龍不說
有太多次團戰是為了打小龍 FW陷入洞口中很不好的位置
還有一次是Ziv多一個TP在單破上塔
那次的小龍根本就應該放掉不能打
硬是要等牛排茂凱回守上路少一人時開打 然後按照ahq的劇本讓Ziv傳送
不如對ahq中塔施加壓力並且賺上路視野好一些
今天的選角上必須說西門可以把非主流角色玩到不ban要承擔後果這點太屌了
不過這點楓堂未必做不到
楓堂的劫或者飛斯都一樣很有水準
甚至勒布朗也有相當的殺傷力
問題或許是在西門玩非meta的個人角時
ahq有一套戰術可以打
而閃電狼可能沒試過使用main角的楓堂搭配現今meta的組合
而寧願相信這陣子努力磨合meta角的選擇
我認為這樣也沒什麼不好
因為相信練習的而獲勝 某種意義上比較強大
至於輸了 也不過是對方更努力罷了
現在的閃電狼 未嘗不需要在失敗中學到更多東西
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.110.32.43
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1428854617.A.B4B.html
推
04/13 00:04, , 1F
04/13 00:04, 1F
→
04/13 00:05, , 2F
04/13 00:05, 2F
→
04/13 00:05, , 3F
04/13 00:05, 3F
推
04/13 00:05, , 4F
04/13 00:05, 4F
推
04/13 00:07, , 5F
04/13 00:07, 5F
噓
04/13 00:07, , 6F
04/13 00:07, 6F
→
04/13 00:08, , 7F
04/13 00:08, 7F
推
04/13 00:08, , 8F
04/13 00:08, 8F
→
04/13 00:08, , 9F
04/13 00:08, 9F
→
04/13 00:08, , 10F
04/13 00:08, 10F
推
04/13 00:09, , 11F
04/13 00:09, 11F
推
04/13 00:09, , 12F
04/13 00:09, 12F
→
04/13 00:09, , 13F
04/13 00:09, 13F
→
04/13 00:10, , 14F
04/13 00:10, 14F
→
04/13 00:10, , 15F
04/13 00:10, 15F
→
04/13 00:11, , 16F
04/13 00:11, 16F
→
04/13 00:11, , 17F
04/13 00:11, 17F
→
04/13 00:12, , 18F
04/13 00:12, 18F
→
04/13 00:12, , 19F
04/13 00:12, 19F
→
04/13 00:13, , 20F
04/13 00:13, 20F
→
04/13 00:14, , 21F
04/13 00:14, 21F
→
04/13 00:14, , 22F
04/13 00:14, 22F
→
04/13 00:14, , 23F
04/13 00:14, 23F
推
04/13 00:15, , 24F
04/13 00:15, 24F
推
04/13 00:16, , 25F
04/13 00:16, 25F
推
04/13 00:16, , 26F
04/13 00:16, 26F
→
04/13 00:17, , 27F
04/13 00:17, 27F
→
04/13 00:17, , 28F
04/13 00:17, 28F
→
04/13 00:17, , 29F
04/13 00:17, 29F
推
04/13 00:17, , 30F
04/13 00:17, 30F
→
04/13 00:18, , 31F
04/13 00:18, 31F
→
04/13 00:18, , 32F
04/13 00:18, 32F
推
04/13 00:19, , 33F
04/13 00:19, 33F
推
04/13 00:19, , 34F
04/13 00:19, 34F
推
04/13 00:20, , 35F
04/13 00:20, 35F
推
04/13 00:21, , 36F
04/13 00:21, 36F
推
04/13 00:21, , 37F
04/13 00:21, 37F
→
04/13 00:21, , 38F
04/13 00:21, 38F
推
04/13 00:21, , 39F
04/13 00:21, 39F
推
04/13 00:22, , 40F
04/13 00:22, 40F
推
04/13 00:23, , 41F
04/13 00:23, 41F
推
04/13 00:23, , 42F
04/13 00:23, 42F
→
04/13 00:25, , 43F
04/13 00:25, 43F
推
04/13 00:25, , 44F
04/13 00:25, 44F
推
04/13 00:25, , 45F
04/13 00:25, 45F
→
04/13 00:25, , 46F
04/13 00:25, 46F
推
04/13 00:26, , 47F
04/13 00:26, 47F
推
04/13 00:27, , 48F
04/13 00:27, 48F
→
04/13 00:28, , 49F
04/13 00:28, 49F
→
04/13 00:28, , 50F
04/13 00:28, 50F
→
04/13 00:28, , 51F
04/13 00:28, 51F
推
04/13 00:31, , 52F
04/13 00:31, 52F
推
04/13 00:31, , 53F
04/13 00:31, 53F
→
04/13 00:31, , 54F
04/13 00:31, 54F
→
04/13 00:31, , 55F
04/13 00:31, 55F
推
04/13 00:32, , 56F
04/13 00:32, 56F
→
04/13 00:34, , 57F
04/13 00:34, 57F
→
04/13 00:35, , 58F
04/13 00:35, 58F
→
04/13 00:35, , 59F
04/13 00:35, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇):