[公告] 多人水桶公告
●27169 +29 2/02 forchocolate □ [問題]有關卡力斯與黛安娜這兩隻英雄請益
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 文章代碼(AID): #1IxI0B5H (LoL) [ptt.cc] [問題]有關卡力斯與黛安娜這兩隻英 │
│ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1391271947.A.151.html │
│ 這一篇文章值 3 Ptt幣 │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
噓 rainy1 :一堆腦殘說黛安娜已死,只知道跟風。自己試過,就知 02/02 14:27
→ rainy1 :道到底猛不猛了 02/02 14:27
C2 15D
---
●27065 X2 1/31 toyog □ [問題] 神秘贈禮
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 文章代碼(AID): #1IwuXgCk (LoL) [ptt.cc] [問題] 神秘贈禮 │
│ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/LoL/M.1391167594.A.32E.html │
│ 這一篇文章值 4 Ptt幣 │
└─────────────────────────────────────┘
→
02/01 11:41,
02/01 11:41
噓
01/31 19:34,
01/31 19:34
willy6098 C2 / david7614 C1
---
被檢舉人 :cipc444 darkyan eric83827 AsGod chocolate832
文章代碼 :#1IydNOu8 #1IydMaN1 #1IydbQvP #1Iydc5W1 #1IyeASFZ
被檢舉人 :lulttm Tae520
文章代碼 :#1Iyka5jX #1Iykut7K
文章數眾多 不一一列出 ALL B1
-----
rainy1 C2
willy6098 C2
david7614 C1
cipc444
darkyan
eric83827
AsGod
chocolate832
lulttm
Tae520 ALL B1
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.250.88.249
→
02/06 12:46, , 1F
02/06 12:46, 1F
推
02/06 12:57, , 2F
02/06 12:57, 2F
推
02/06 12:58, , 3F
02/06 12:58, 3F
cipc444 darkyan 改判無違反板規
推
02/06 13:06, , 4F
02/06 13:06, 4F
噓
02/06 13:11, , 5F
02/06 13:11, 5F
推
02/06 13:11, , 6F
02/06 13:11, 6F
→
02/06 13:16, , 7F
02/06 13:16, 7F
噓
02/06 13:22, , 8F
02/06 13:22, 8F
→
02/06 13:25, , 9F
02/06 13:25, 9F
推
02/06 13:29, , 10F
02/06 13:29, 10F
→
02/06 13:29, , 11F
02/06 13:29, 11F
推
02/06 13:29, , 12F
02/06 13:29, 12F
推
02/06 13:29, , 13F
02/06 13:29, 13F
→
02/06 13:35, , 14F
02/06 13:35, 14F
噓
02/06 13:36, , 15F
02/06 13:36, 15F
你有看全文嗎? 還是根本看都沒看?
推
02/06 13:37, , 16F
02/06 13:37, 16F
我也是預官退役。
做智商測驗當然沒問題,也不會被桶,
但是那篇文章參照前因後果,下方推噓文明顯是在攻擊原PO,
(且根據板規,噓文視為反對意見)
綜合以上所述,我不認為噓文的人是純粹路過,不看文章,
只是想建議原PO去做智商測驗。
相反地,那絕對是帶有攻擊性的言詞,甚至是有可能會被告的程度,
因此判違反C項板規我覺得是相當正確的。
噓
02/06 13:37, , 17F
02/06 13:37, 17F
噓
02/06 13:38, , 18F
02/06 13:38, 18F
文字獄不是這樣用的,來點新招吧。
→
02/06 13:40, , 19F
02/06 13:40, 19F
推
02/06 13:42, , 20F
02/06 13:42, 20F
→
02/06 13:44, , 21F
02/06 13:44, 21F
→
02/06 13:47, , 22F
02/06 13:47, 22F
你有看全文嗎?
你看得懂判決理由嗎?
要嘛就拿出合理論點說服我
不然推這種零戰力的東西我看就不必了
推
02/06 13:50, , 23F
02/06 13:50, 23F
推
02/06 13:50, , 24F
02/06 13:50, 24F
→
02/06 13:52, , 25F
02/06 13:52, 25F
噓
02/06 13:53, , 26F
02/06 13:53, 26F
推
02/06 13:53, , 27F
02/06 13:53, 27F
推
02/06 13:55, , 28F
02/06 13:55, 28F
推
02/06 13:56, , 29F
02/06 13:56, 29F
→
02/06 13:56, , 30F
02/06 13:56, 30F
→
02/06 13:57, , 31F
02/06 13:57, 31F
噓
02/06 14:02, , 32F
02/06 14:02, 32F
推
02/06 14:02, , 33F
02/06 14:02, 33F
→
02/06 14:03, , 34F
02/06 14:03, 34F
→
02/06 14:03, , 35F
02/06 14:03, 35F
同意,這次應該沒問題了,
下次如果又遇到容易造成誤會的我會斟酌附上證據,
感謝建議。
※ 編輯: asdlkjfgh 來自: 111.250.88.249 (02/06 14:05)
推
02/06 14:03, , 36F
02/06 14:03, 36F
推
02/06 14:05, , 37F
02/06 14:05, 37F
→
02/06 14:06, , 38F
02/06 14:06, 38F
推
02/06 14:06, , 39F
02/06 14:06, 39F
→
02/06 14:07, , 40F
02/06 14:07, 40F
推
02/06 14:07, , 41F
02/06 14:07, 41F
→
02/06 14:07, , 42F
02/06 14:07, 42F
→
02/06 14:08, , 43F
02/06 14:08, 43F
推
02/06 14:10, , 44F
02/06 14:10, 44F
推
02/06 14:13, , 45F
02/06 14:13, 45F
推
02/06 14:21, , 46F
02/06 14:21, 46F
推
02/06 14:24, , 47F
02/06 14:24, 47F
噓
02/06 14:31, , 48F
02/06 14:31, 48F
推
02/06 14:32, , 49F
02/06 14:32, 49F
推
02/06 14:35, , 50F
02/06 14:35, 50F
推
02/06 14:40, , 51F
02/06 14:40, 51F
推
02/06 15:12, , 52F
02/06 15:12, 52F
→
02/06 15:15, , 53F
02/06 15:15, 53F
推
02/06 15:45, , 54F
02/06 15:45, 54F
推
02/06 15:59, , 55F
02/06 15:59, 55F
推
02/06 16:04, , 56F
02/06 16:04, 56F
推
02/06 16:39, , 57F
02/06 16:39, 57F
→
02/06 16:40, , 58F
02/06 16:40, 58F
推
02/06 16:40, , 59F
02/06 16:40, 59F
推
02/06 17:16, , 60F
02/06 17:16, 60F
推
02/06 18:33, , 61F
02/06 18:33, 61F
推
02/06 20:10, , 62F
02/06 20:10, 62F
噓
02/06 22:38, , 63F
02/06 22:38, 63F
噓
02/07 00:00, , 64F
02/07 00:00, 64F
→
02/07 00:00, , 65F
02/07 00:00, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)