Re: [閒聊] 拖庭一小時又20分鐘
→
07/12 06:25,
07/12 06:25
→
07/12 09:03,
07/12 09:03
→
07/12 09:04,
07/12 09:04
→
07/12 09:05,
07/12 09:05
→
07/12 09:08,
07/12 09:08
這類的言論,有沒有像下面這個?
→
11/12 23:56,
11/12 23:56
→
11/12 23:57,
11/12 23:57
→
11/12 23:59,
11/12 23:59
推
05/05 19:51,
05/05 19:51
→
05/05 19:52,
05/05 19:52
→
05/05 19:53,
05/05 19:53
→
05/05 19:54,
05/05 19:54
→
05/05 21:57,
05/05 21:57
推
05/28 09:12,
05/28 09:12
→
05/28 09:13,
05/28 09:13
推
05/28 09:29,
05/28 09:29
→
05/28 09:30,
05/28 09:30
噓
06/06 17:16,
06/06 17:16
→
06/06 17:17,
06/06 17:17
→
06/06 17:18,
06/06 17:18
→
06/06 17:19,
06/06 17:19
噓
06/06 17:21,
06/06 17:21
#1DCcTCyN (Lawyer)
作者 asasadad (mio) 看板 Lawyer
◆ From: 207.181.202.250
#1DTZu4NC (Lawyer)
作者 georgeko (georgeko) 看板 Lawyer
◆ From: 207.181.202.250
#1B_bs0xA (Lawyer)
→
05/28 11:09,
05/28 11:09
→
05/28 11:10,
05/28 11:10
我想這樣的言論應該還算是沒扭曲到吧?
最後補一個除了「士林交互詰問事件」以外的狀況外番外篇:
推 asasadad:東吳不是6500嗎,應該還算便宜吧,也沒人嫌東吳在邊陲 06/02 09:26
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.39.106.164
推
07/12 17:22, , 1F
07/12 17:22, 1F
推
07/12 17:31, , 2F
07/12 17:31, 2F
→
07/12 17:39, , 3F
07/12 17:39, 3F
→
07/12 17:43, , 4F
07/12 17:43, 4F
推
07/12 19:52, , 5F
07/12 19:52, 5F
→
07/12 21:54, , 6F
07/12 21:54, 6F
推
07/12 21:55, , 7F
07/12 21:55, 7F
推
07/12 22:34, , 8F
07/12 22:34, 8F
推
07/12 22:50, , 9F
07/12 22:50, 9F
→
07/12 23:06, , 10F
07/12 23:06, 10F
→
07/12 23:08, , 11F
07/12 23:08, 11F
推
07/12 23:15, , 12F
07/12 23:15, 12F
推
07/13 08:23, , 13F
07/13 08:23, 13F
→
07/13 08:24, , 14F
07/13 08:24, 14F
推
07/13 11:08, , 15F
07/13 11:08, 15F
→
07/13 12:40, , 16F
07/13 12:40, 16F
討論串 (同標題文章)