Re: [討教] 降龍掌另一方面的討論
金庸說過蕭峰降龍掌是三人中最強的,也曾說過郭靖是他小說中男主角中最厲害的,其實
我覺得兩者並不衝突。
降龍十八掌在蕭峰之後有部分失傳,洪七公學到的一部分是師授,一部分是自己的心得,
理論上到此時傳下來的降龍必定有殘缺,所以單以降龍來看蕭峰的最純。可是九陰真經並
非單純內功,你看老玩童在桃花島不小心學來的身法,黃藥師根本打不太到,對照郭靖後
來內功、輕功的大幅進步,以及射鵰末郭靖跟歐陽鋒的一串打鬥,有卸力技巧、招式、療
傷、易筋鍛骨篇的硬功、分筋縮骨篇的軟功,幾乎包含了各種武學的細節,非常全面。這
種全面就是郭靖最大的本錢,也是最容易讓人忽略的地方。一般人會覺得練了幾種很厲害
的絕招就超強,其實這就是盲點。
為什麼會說喬峰會說很多比喬峰厲害的人都打輸他,而且輸的"心服口服",我認為關鍵就
在這裡。看喬峰對游坦之,內力輸,掌力輸,硬拼對掌難以取勝,所以攻擊下盤,也就是
游坦之最弱的地方,所以取勝。這就是全面,在小細節上勝過對方。至於聚賢莊一戰,其
時我不認為他是爆發,而是發起脾氣沒有顧慮,將實力完完全全展現而已。
至於郭靖,其實他很少完全發揮實力,但是基本上在神鵰只要他"必須"認真打,幾乎都是
壓倒性的優勢。帶楊過上終南山,一開始打百人大陣似乎有被為難到,等到發現楊過失蹤
,馬上輕鬆破陣。一個人力到再大也不及百人,而他用左右互搏施展降龍,一邊用推一邊
用拉,然後在對方發力瞬間互換,這就是"巧",不就跟蕭峰鬥游坦之一樣,靠的是經驗、
臨場反應,而這些小細節就是他強的因素。就大小武那段更讓我認為他實戰一定遠勝法王
,即使內力掌力不一定會贏,綜合各方面的小細節就差很多。
像前幾篇狄雲丁典誰強,我認為丁典有利之處就在全面,內功兩者可能差不多,可是狄雲
沒輕功,經驗也不足,使用的是第一流的刀法也未必會贏,看他對花鐵幹就知道了,即使
武功大勝,在一些實戰上的細節尚未掌握,並未能輕鬆取勝,所以即使他有第一流的刀法
和內力,總體上也只能和丁典"未遑多讓",這就是經驗、全面的差別。
回來看郭靖喬峰這兩個真正一流的高手,其實他們都屬於幾乎沒有弱點的那種。看郭靖在
射鵰的表現,真實功力可能還比不上梁子翁,實際上真要打起來射鵰末的郭靖應該是贏定
了,甚至殺紅眼跟黃藥師打還能長時間不落下風。而由喬峰隔空取物的擒龍功,也可以發
現他並非只會降龍硬打,也是能收能發的那種。這兩個人其實非常類似,大概蒙古人和契
丹人相性很合吧!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 114.37.37.249
推
09/18 01:26, , 1F
09/18 01:26, 1F
→
09/18 01:27, , 2F
09/18 01:27, 2F
→
09/18 01:27, , 3F
09/18 01:27, 3F
→
09/18 01:28, , 4F
09/18 01:28, 4F
→
09/18 01:28, , 5F
09/18 01:28, 5F
→
09/18 01:30, , 6F
09/18 01:30, 6F
→
09/18 01:31, , 7F
09/18 01:31, 7F
→
09/18 01:31, , 8F
09/18 01:31, 8F
→
09/18 01:32, , 9F
09/18 01:32, 9F
→
09/18 01:33, , 10F
09/18 01:33, 10F
→
09/18 01:33, , 11F
09/18 01:33, 11F
→
09/18 01:34, , 12F
09/18 01:34, 12F
→
09/18 01:34, , 13F
09/18 01:34, 13F
推
09/18 01:56, , 14F
09/18 01:56, 14F
→
09/18 01:57, , 15F
09/18 01:57, 15F
→
09/18 01:59, , 16F
09/18 01:59, 16F
→
09/18 02:01, , 17F
09/18 02:01, 17F
推
09/18 02:01, , 18F
09/18 02:01, 18F
→
09/18 02:01, , 19F
09/18 02:01, 19F
→
09/18 02:02, , 20F
09/18 02:02, 20F
→
09/18 02:05, , 21F
09/18 02:05, 21F
→
09/18 09:31, , 22F
09/18 09:31, 22F
→
09/18 10:19, , 23F
09/18 10:19, 23F
推
09/18 11:42, , 24F
09/18 11:42, 24F
→
09/18 12:43, , 25F
09/18 12:43, 25F
→
09/18 12:48, , 26F
09/18 12:48, 26F
推
09/18 12:49, , 27F
09/18 12:49, 27F
推
09/18 12:59, , 28F
09/18 12:59, 28F
→
09/18 13:00, , 29F
09/18 13:00, 29F
推
09/18 13:23, , 30F
09/18 13:23, 30F
→
09/18 13:24, , 31F
09/18 13:24, 31F
→
09/18 13:24, , 32F
09/18 13:24, 32F
→
09/18 13:25, , 33F
09/18 13:25, 33F
→
09/18 13:25, , 34F
09/18 13:25, 34F
推
09/18 14:04, , 35F
09/18 14:04, 35F
推
09/18 14:16, , 36F
09/18 14:16, 36F
→
09/18 16:42, , 37F
09/18 16:42, 37F
→
09/18 16:43, , 38F
09/18 16:43, 38F
→
09/18 16:43, , 39F
09/18 16:43, 39F
→
09/18 16:44, , 40F
09/18 16:44, 40F
→
09/18 16:44, , 41F
09/18 16:44, 41F
→
09/18 16:46, , 42F
09/18 16:46, 42F
→
09/18 16:46, , 43F
09/18 16:46, 43F
→
09/18 16:48, , 44F
09/18 16:48, 44F
→
09/18 16:48, , 45F
09/18 16:48, 45F
→
09/18 16:49, , 46F
09/18 16:49, 46F
→
09/18 20:35, , 47F
09/18 20:35, 47F
→
09/18 20:37, , 48F
09/18 20:37, 48F
→
09/18 20:38, , 49F
09/18 20:38, 49F
→
09/18 20:39, , 50F
09/18 20:39, 50F
→
09/18 20:40, , 51F
09/18 20:40, 51F
→
09/18 20:49, , 52F
09/18 20:49, 52F
→
09/19 00:42, , 53F
09/19 00:42, 53F
→
09/19 00:43, , 54F
09/19 00:43, 54F
→
09/19 00:44, , 55F
09/19 00:44, 55F
推
09/19 01:50, , 56F
09/19 01:50, 56F
推
09/19 02:09, , 57F
09/19 02:09, 57F
→
09/19 02:10, , 58F
09/19 02:10, 58F
→
09/19 02:10, , 59F
09/19 02:10, 59F
→
09/19 02:11, , 60F
09/19 02:11, 60F
→
09/19 02:13, , 61F
09/19 02:13, 61F
→
09/19 02:13, , 62F
09/19 02:13, 62F
→
09/19 09:57, , 63F
09/19 09:57, 63F
推
09/19 18:52, , 64F
09/19 18:52, 64F
→
09/19 18:52, , 65F
09/19 18:52, 65F
推
09/19 19:14, , 66F
09/19 19:14, 66F
推
09/21 13:52, , 67F
09/21 13:52, 67F
→
09/21 13:52, , 68F
09/21 13:52, 68F
→
09/21 22:29, , 69F
09/21 22:29, 69F
→
09/21 22:29, , 70F
09/21 22:29, 70F
推
09/22 10:43, , 71F
09/22 10:43, 71F
→
11/04 09:30, , 72F
11/04 09:30, 72F
討論串 (同標題文章)