Re: [情報] 維護綠卡權益 請反對HR3012法案

看板Immigration作者 (プロレタリアートの夜明)時間12年前 (2011/12/17 04:18), 編輯推噓4(4012)
留言16則, 5人參與, 最新討論串6/6 (看更多)
New amendment from Sen.Grassley: 12/16/2011: H.R. 3012 Nego Set-Back in the Senate * There was an important development for this bill in the Senate yesterday. According to AILA, Senator Grassley offered an amendment that (1) eliminated the provisions for the family per country limit increase, (2) proposed to reduce the employment based per country limit to 15%, (3) proposed to eliminate diversiity visa program, and (4) proposed provisions to increase enforcement and U.S. worker protections to the H-1B and L-1 visa programs. As the readers can see from the foregoing proposals, such proposals are something which the Democrat Senators cannnot accept and reportly his amendment was objected. AILA thus reports that his hold on the H.R. 3012 remains in tact. Reportedly, survivality of H.R. 3012 itself is considered dubious. 和原本3012法案相比 第二項,職業移民的國別上限將從現有 7% 放寬至 15%, 比之前的無限制好了不少 如果真的通過了,對台灣EB-2應該就不會有太大影響了吧 -- ╭───────────────╮ # ⊙-⊙ │幹你媽的運輸大隊長,等你戰敗後,│ 皿 ≡ │再讓阿共將歷史教科書竄改, │ □︵□ ── ╯你就有八百萬美械軍了. │ ▄◤ ◤歷史▇▇▇╰───────────────╯ ▽▽ ψ fyc -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 71.249.137.9

12/17 04:35, , 1F
該修改提議已經被拒絕,所以內容不重要; 第一輪搓湯圓失敗
12/17 04:35, 1F

12/17 04:36, , 2F
但是民主黨參議員已很巧妙的提出新法案S 1983,可能換一條路
12/17 04:36, 2F

12/17 04:37, , 3F
總之,相關法案的前途都不明朗,值得注意
12/17 04:37, 3F

12/18 11:40, , 4F
HR3012已經被放在Senate的Calendar上,跳過Committee了
12/18 11:40, 4F

12/18 11:41, , 5F
所以還是要繼續傳真/email/打電話給 Senator
12/18 11:41, 5F

12/18 11:42, , 6F
大家繼續努力吧!
12/18 11:42, 6F

12/18 12:31, , 7F
推熱心J大...衝衝衝啊:)
12/18 12:31, 7F

12/18 17:10, , 8F
想請問放在Calendar上跳過Committee是指..
12/18 17:10, 8F

12/18 18:51, , 9F
跟樓上一樣的問題...請問跳過committee背後含意是什麼
12/18 18:51, 9F

12/19 00:17, , 10F
Sen. Grassley put a hold on the bill,所以這個法案應該是
12/19 00:17, 10F

12/19 00:18, , 11F
不表決(基於尊重Hold的立場),直到hold被移除,加上 G也是
12/19 00:18, 11F

12/19 00:19, , 12F
Committee的一員,但是印度人現在用Rule 14直接繞過hold和
12/19 00:19, 12F

12/19 00:21, , 13F
Committee,被放上calendar,如果Sen Reid認為要表決的話,是可
12/19 00:21, 13F

12/19 00:21, , 14F
以提出來表決,所以決定權在Reid,但有人說Reid就是提出這個方
12/19 00:21, 14F

12/19 00:22, , 15F
法的人,所以如果真的是這樣的話... 我們就要更努力去連絡其
12/19 00:22, 15F

12/19 00:23, , 16F
他Senators讓他們反對,例如Schumer,Durbiin,Leahy..
12/19 00:23, 16F
文章代碼(AID): #1EwwUibO (Immigration)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1EwwUibO (Immigration)