[討論] 民進黨不能接受公務員的待遇提升嗎?
在通膨劇烈
公務員的實質薪水已經屬於底層的狀況下
提案
停止公務員年金逐年遞減
退休金應依照物價指數調整
居然被民進黨的立法委員反對?
說真的每年政府亂花的錢
都遠大於砍公務員待遇省下來的錢
甚至補貼勞保的錢也超過年改的差額
勞保不改,不就殺公務員補勞工而已?
我不覺得政府的支出
可以因為砍公務員待遇就得到緩解吧
基本薪資這幾年漲20-30%
物價更不知道噴到哪裡去了
結果公務員薪水只有選舉年調個3%
說真的一次加個10%都不夠
結果公務員加薪跟施捨流浪狗一樣?
請問民進黨的政客
就這麼見不得公務員的待遇提升嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.136.151.105 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1712914099.A.EA4.html
→
04/12 17:29,
2周前
, 1F
04/12 17:29, 1F
都提升會怎樣嗎
噓
04/12 17:29,
2周前
, 2F
04/12 17:29, 2F
不管現職還是退休公務員明顯都需要調高啊
推
04/12 17:29,
2周前
, 3F
04/12 17:29, 3F
當這麼大官
用這種方式決策也太可悲了吧
→
04/12 17:29,
2周前
, 4F
04/12 17:29, 4F
噓
04/12 17:29,
2周前
, 5F
04/12 17:29, 5F
→
04/12 17:30,
2周前
, 6F
04/12 17:30, 6F
→
04/12 17:30,
2周前
, 7F
04/12 17:30, 7F
→
04/12 17:30,
2周前
, 8F
04/12 17:30, 8F
大立委因為人家投不投給你決定政策?
讚啦
→
04/12 17:31,
2周前
, 9F
04/12 17:31, 9F
→
04/12 17:31,
2周前
, 10F
04/12 17:31, 10F
我內文有寫啊
通膨多少 勞工調了多少公務員才多少?
而且所得替代率差那幾%政府有差?
有差怎麼不敢動勞保?
噓
04/12 17:32,
2周前
, 11F
04/12 17:32, 11F
→
04/12 17:32,
2周前
, 12F
04/12 17:32, 12F
通膨這麼嚴重為什麼不用
推
04/12 17:32,
2周前
, 13F
04/12 17:32, 13F
→
04/12 17:32,
2周前
, 14F
04/12 17:32, 14F
推
04/12 17:32,
2周前
, 15F
04/12 17:32, 15F
沒人要當公務員
綠共就可以塞人進去囉
噓
04/12 17:33,
2周前
, 16F
04/12 17:33, 16F
→
04/12 17:33,
2周前
, 17F
04/12 17:33, 17F
推
04/12 17:33,
2周前
, 18F
04/12 17:33, 18F
有啊 勞工調30% 公務員調10%
然後砍公保不動勞保 嘻嘻
噓
04/12 17:34,
2周前
, 19F
04/12 17:34, 19F
數據都給你了還雲
噓
04/12 17:38,
2周前
, 20F
04/12 17:38, 20F
推
04/12 17:38,
2周前
, 21F
04/12 17:38, 21F
→
04/12 17:38,
2周前
, 22F
04/12 17:38, 22F
→
04/12 17:38,
2周前
, 23F
04/12 17:38, 23F
噓
04/12 17:38,
2周前
, 24F
04/12 17:38, 24F
之前有在講調薪法制化啊
※ 編輯: NTUST (223.136.151.105 臺灣), 04/12/2024 17:39:50
→
04/12 17:40,
2周前
, 25F
04/12 17:40, 25F
推
04/12 17:41,
2周前
, 26F
04/12 17:41, 26F
→
04/12 17:41,
2周前
, 27F
04/12 17:41, 27F
推
04/12 17:42,
2周前
, 28F
04/12 17:42, 28F
推
04/12 17:44,
2周前
, 29F
04/12 17:44, 29F
→
04/12 17:44,
2周前
, 30F
04/12 17:44, 30F
推
04/12 17:46,
2周前
, 31F
04/12 17:46, 31F
→
04/12 17:47,
2周前
, 32F
04/12 17:47, 32F
→
04/12 17:47,
2周前
, 33F
04/12 17:47, 33F
噓
04/12 17:51,
2周前
, 34F
04/12 17:51, 34F
→
04/12 17:53,
2周前
, 35F
04/12 17:53, 35F
推
04/12 17:57,
2周前
, 36F
04/12 17:57, 36F
推
04/12 17:59,
2周前
, 37F
04/12 17:59, 37F
→
04/12 17:59,
2周前
, 38F
04/12 17:59, 38F
推
04/12 18:11,
2周前
, 39F
04/12 18:11, 39F
→
04/12 18:12,
2周前
, 40F
04/12 18:12, 40F
→
04/12 18:14,
2周前
, 41F
04/12 18:14, 41F
→
04/12 18:14,
2周前
, 42F
04/12 18:14, 42F
推
04/12 18:18,
2周前
, 43F
04/12 18:18, 43F
推
04/12 18:37,
2周前
, 44F
04/12 18:37, 44F
→
04/12 19:22,
2周前
, 45F
04/12 19:22, 45F
→
04/12 19:22,
2周前
, 46F
04/12 19:22, 46F
→
04/12 19:22,
2周前
, 47F
04/12 19:22, 47F
→
04/12 19:22,
2周前
, 48F
04/12 19:22, 48F
→
04/12 20:09,
2周前
, 49F
04/12 20:09, 49F
→
04/12 20:09,
2周前
, 50F
04/12 20:09, 50F
噓
04/12 20:57,
2周前
, 51F
04/12 20:57, 51F
→
04/12 20:58,
2周前
, 52F
04/12 20:58, 52F
噓
04/12 21:54,
2周前
, 53F
04/12 21:54, 53F
噓
04/12 22:49,
2周前
, 54F
04/12 22:49, 54F
噓
04/12 23:24,
2周前
, 55F
04/12 23:24, 55F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):