[討論] 問一下為何中國打壓是幫民進黨加分消失
如果說是民進黨在野的時候,喊中華台北喪權辱國,讓人以為民進黨有抵制打壓的手段
民進黨讓大家覺得他上台邦交國更多、甚至台灣能夠繼續走向國際,那支持有理
但是民進黨上台以後發現它對於打壓一直都在講幹話
一邊說希望兩岸對話,一邊又呼籲全世界抵制中國
甚至被打壓時還說台灣更加走向世界,黑人問號?完全的幹話不是嗎?
航空公司改名、失去的邦交回不來、失去的東亞青運主辦權也回不來
原來我會支持一個政黨選上讓台灣往下探底?我覺得這不合邏輯啊
拜託說明一下為何中國打壓加劇是幫民進黨催票,我不太能理解
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.230.51.57
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1532536136.A.BA2.html
※ 編輯: Sinreigensou (36.230.51.57), 07/26/2018 00:29:26
推
07/26 00:29, , 1F
07/26 00:29, 1F
→
07/26 00:29, , 2F
07/26 00:29, 2F
推
07/26 00:30, , 3F
07/26 00:30, 3F
→
07/26 00:30, , 4F
07/26 00:30, 4F
→
07/26 00:30, , 5F
07/26 00:30, 5F
→
07/26 00:31, , 6F
07/26 00:31, 6F
推
07/26 00:32, , 7F
07/26 00:32, 7F
→
07/26 00:32, , 8F
07/26 00:32, 8F
→
07/26 00:33, , 9F
07/26 00:33, 9F
問題是民進黨根本沒有反制手段,中共實質打壓成功它還一直阿Q講幹話
※ 編輯: Sinreigensou (36.230.51.57), 07/26/2018 00:34:12
推
07/26 00:33, , 10F
07/26 00:33, 10F
→
07/26 00:33, , 11F
07/26 00:33, 11F
推
07/26 00:34, , 12F
07/26 00:34, 12F
推
07/26 00:34, , 13F
07/26 00:34, 13F
→
07/26 00:34, , 14F
07/26 00:34, 14F
→
07/26 00:35, , 15F
07/26 00:35, 15F
→
07/26 00:36, , 16F
07/26 00:36, 16F
噓
07/26 00:36, , 17F
07/26 00:36, 17F
推
07/26 00:36, , 18F
07/26 00:36, 18F
→
07/26 00:36, , 19F
07/26 00:36, 19F
→
07/26 00:37, , 20F
07/26 00:37, 20F
→
07/26 00:37, , 21F
07/26 00:37, 21F
→
07/26 00:37, , 22F
07/26 00:37, 22F
...感覺就是氣急敗壞惱羞乾脆繼續爛下去
※ 編輯: Sinreigensou (36.230.51.57), 07/26/2018 00:38:30
→
07/26 00:38, , 23F
07/26 00:38, 23F
推
07/26 00:39, , 24F
07/26 00:39, 24F
推
07/26 00:39, , 25F
07/26 00:39, 25F
→
07/26 00:39, , 26F
07/26 00:39, 26F
台灣人好像真的就是反骨 吃硬不吃軟
如果中共動武成功才有可能統一台灣
不然被打壓在嚴重一樣會投民進黨
→
07/26 00:39, , 27F
07/26 00:39, 27F
推
07/26 00:40, , 28F
07/26 00:40, 28F
※ 編輯: Sinreigensou (36.230.51.57), 07/26/2018 00:41:39
→
07/26 00:40, , 29F
07/26 00:40, 29F
※ 編輯: Sinreigensou (36.230.51.57), 07/26/2018 00:42:55
→
07/26 00:41, , 30F
07/26 00:41, 30F
→
07/26 00:43, , 31F
07/26 00:43, 31F
→
07/26 00:43, , 32F
07/26 00:43, 32F
推
07/26 00:43, , 33F
07/26 00:43, 33F
推
07/26 00:43, , 34F
07/26 00:43, 34F
還有 41 則推文
還有 5 段內文
→
07/26 01:05, , 76F
07/26 01:05, 76F
→
07/26 01:06, , 77F
07/26 01:06, 77F
推
07/26 01:07, , 78F
07/26 01:07, 78F
→
07/26 01:08, , 79F
07/26 01:08, 79F
→
07/26 01:08, , 80F
07/26 01:08, 80F
推
07/26 01:19, , 81F
07/26 01:19, 81F
推
07/26 01:22, , 82F
07/26 01:22, 82F
→
07/26 01:22, , 83F
07/26 01:22, 83F
推
07/26 01:23, , 84F
07/26 01:23, 84F
→
07/26 01:56, , 85F
07/26 01:56, 85F
→
07/26 01:57, , 86F
07/26 01:57, 86F
→
07/26 01:58, , 87F
07/26 01:58, 87F
推
07/26 02:08, , 88F
07/26 02:08, 88F
→
07/26 02:08, , 89F
07/26 02:08, 89F
→
07/26 02:08, , 90F
07/26 02:08, 90F
→
07/26 02:08, , 91F
07/26 02:08, 91F
→
07/26 02:08, , 92F
07/26 02:08, 92F
→
07/26 02:08, , 93F
07/26 02:08, 93F
→
07/26 02:09, , 94F
07/26 02:09, 94F
推
07/26 02:17, , 95F
07/26 02:17, 95F
→
07/26 02:17, , 96F
07/26 02:17, 96F
→
07/26 02:18, , 97F
07/26 02:18, 97F
→
07/26 02:19, , 98F
07/26 02:19, 98F
→
07/26 02:20, , 99F
07/26 02:20, 99F
推
07/26 02:20, , 100F
07/26 02:20, 100F
→
07/26 02:20, , 101F
07/26 02:20, 101F
→
07/26 02:21, , 102F
07/26 02:21, 102F
→
07/26 02:21, , 103F
07/26 02:21, 103F
推
07/26 02:24, , 104F
07/26 02:24, 104F
→
07/26 02:25, , 105F
07/26 02:25, 105F
推
07/26 02:59, , 106F
07/26 02:59, 106F
噓
07/26 04:40, , 107F
07/26 04:40, 107F
→
07/26 05:08, , 108F
07/26 05:08, 108F
→
07/26 05:09, , 109F
07/26 05:09, 109F
→
07/26 05:54, , 110F
07/26 05:54, 110F
噓
07/26 07:36, , 111F
07/26 07:36, 111F
→
07/26 07:37, , 112F
07/26 07:37, 112F
噓
07/26 07:59, , 113F
07/26 07:59, 113F
噓
07/26 08:45, , 114F
07/26 08:45, 114F
噓
07/26 11:50, , 115F
07/26 11:50, 115F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):