Re: [討論] 為何全面追殺柯文哲?消失
※ 引述《chal ( )》之銘言:
: 駡是為了他好 也是為了台灣好
: 目的就是要避免國民黨再拿回北市
: 目的就是要避免他變成馬英九3.0
很抱歉 會這樣想的終究只是少數
大部份的觀眾聽到名嘴節目一直罵 也不會去管3721
直接就給柯文哲負分了
是的 輕鬆被洗腦的愚民還是很多
不然朱立倫不會還有快400萬票 神豬也不會還有60萬票
國家議題有哪些 "健保DRG" "年金制度" "中資(紫光中嘉)" "觀光困境" "寒害農損"
但再大條的問題 也比不上"內湖塞車"
這是為了台灣好嗎 不 媒體要的是這些愚民打印象分數 要的是打柯成功
為何?很簡單
因為打柯是藍綠共同目標 台北市長是藍綠都要搶的碉堡
綠要的是全面執政最後一塊拼圖(郭正亮已經當先鋒了)
藍更不用說 照死裡打就對了
對媒體來說 打柯就是一件藍綠都討好 有利無弊的事 就好像一支穩漲的股票
換作是你 你買不買?你打不打?
柯P當然可以罵 當然可以不投
但要是以為媒體打柯是為了台灣好台北好 這麼阿Q的想法
那就真的太天真了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.230.111.188
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/HatePolitics/M.1454697214.A.E85.html
推
02/06 02:37, , 1F
02/06 02:37, 1F
→
02/06 02:37, , 2F
02/06 02:37, 2F
推
02/06 02:37, , 3F
02/06 02:37, 3F
→
02/06 02:38, , 4F
02/06 02:38, 4F
→
02/06 02:38, , 5F
02/06 02:38, 5F
→
02/06 02:38, , 6F
02/06 02:38, 6F
推
02/06 02:39, , 7F
02/06 02:39, 7F
→
02/06 02:39, , 8F
02/06 02:39, 8F
當初投柯是因為綠色沒人選 很多綠選民是不得以而為之
現在專心打柯 兩年後推個人選
總比呆呆不作為 讓柯當八年好
不要忘記小英最多也八年 對綠來說 這最後一塊拼圖最好是在4年內收回的
就算小英或DPPER不在乎 姚文智們也不可能放著大肉不去咬
而至於打柯效果如何 我說過 愚民還是很多的 不分藍綠
→
02/06 02:40, , 9F
02/06 02:40, 9F
推
02/06 02:41, , 10F
02/06 02:41, 10F
※ 編輯: senria (36.230.111.188), 02/06/2016 02:46:47
→
02/06 02:42, , 11F
02/06 02:42, 11F
推
02/06 02:42, , 12F
02/06 02:42, 12F
推
02/06 02:43, , 13F
02/06 02:43, 13F
→
02/06 02:43, , 14F
02/06 02:43, 14F
→
02/06 02:43, , 15F
02/06 02:43, 15F
→
02/06 02:44, , 16F
02/06 02:44, 16F
→
02/06 02:44, , 17F
02/06 02:44, 17F
→
02/06 02:44, , 18F
02/06 02:44, 18F
推
02/06 02:44, , 19F
02/06 02:44, 19F
推
02/06 02:45, , 20F
02/06 02:45, 20F
推
02/06 02:45, , 21F
02/06 02:45, 21F
→
02/06 02:46, , 22F
02/06 02:46, 22F
→
02/06 02:46, , 23F
02/06 02:46, 23F
→
02/06 02:46, , 24F
02/06 02:46, 24F
→
02/06 02:47, , 25F
02/06 02:47, 25F
→
02/06 02:47, , 26F
02/06 02:47, 26F
推
02/06 02:48, , 27F
02/06 02:48, 27F
→
02/06 02:48, , 28F
02/06 02:48, 28F
→
02/06 02:48, , 29F
02/06 02:48, 29F
推
02/06 02:50, , 30F
02/06 02:50, 30F
→
02/06 02:51, , 31F
02/06 02:51, 31F
推
02/06 02:52, , 32F
02/06 02:52, 32F
推
02/06 02:53, , 33F
02/06 02:53, 33F
推
02/06 02:53, , 34F
02/06 02:53, 34F
→
02/06 02:53, , 35F
02/06 02:53, 35F
→
02/06 02:54, , 36F
02/06 02:54, 36F
噓
02/06 02:55, , 37F
02/06 02:55, 37F
→
02/06 02:56, , 38F
02/06 02:56, 38F
推
02/06 02:57, , 39F
02/06 02:57, 39F
推
02/06 02:58, , 40F
02/06 02:58, 40F
推
02/06 02:59, , 41F
02/06 02:59, 41F
→
02/06 03:07, , 42F
02/06 03:07, 42F
推
02/06 03:29, , 43F
02/06 03:29, 43F
→
02/06 03:31, , 44F
02/06 03:31, 44F
→
02/06 03:32, , 45F
02/06 03:32, 45F
→
02/06 03:32, , 46F
02/06 03:32, 46F
推
02/06 03:34, , 47F
02/06 03:34, 47F
→
02/06 03:35, , 48F
02/06 03:35, 48F
→
02/06 03:36, , 49F
02/06 03:36, 49F
→
02/06 03:38, , 50F
02/06 03:38, 50F
→
02/06 03:40, , 51F
02/06 03:40, 51F
推
02/06 03:42, , 52F
02/06 03:42, 52F
推
02/06 03:42, , 53F
02/06 03:42, 53F
→
02/06 03:42, , 54F
02/06 03:42, 54F
→
02/06 03:42, , 55F
02/06 03:42, 55F
→
02/06 03:44, , 56F
02/06 03:44, 56F
→
02/06 03:44, , 57F
02/06 03:44, 57F
→
02/06 03:44, , 58F
02/06 03:44, 58F
推
02/06 03:46, , 59F
02/06 03:46, 59F
推
02/06 03:47, , 60F
02/06 03:47, 60F
→
02/06 03:48, , 61F
02/06 03:48, 61F
→
02/06 03:50, , 62F
02/06 03:50, 62F
推
02/06 03:52, , 63F
02/06 03:52, 63F
推
02/06 03:58, , 64F
02/06 03:58, 64F
推
02/06 04:17, , 65F
02/06 04:17, 65F
噓
02/06 11:00, , 66F
02/06 11:00, 66F
噓
02/06 11:41, , 67F
02/06 11:41, 67F
推
02/06 12:18, , 68F
02/06 12:18, 68F
→
02/06 12:18, , 69F
02/06 12:18, 69F
→
02/06 12:19, , 70F
02/06 12:19, 70F
推
02/06 13:45, , 71F
02/06 13:45, 71F
→
02/06 13:45, , 72F
02/06 13:45, 72F
推
02/06 15:49, , 73F
02/06 15:49, 73F
→
02/06 15:51, , 74F
02/06 15:51, 74F
推
02/06 15:53, , 75F
02/06 15:53, 75F
→
02/06 15:54, , 76F
02/06 15:54, 76F
→
02/06 15:54, , 77F
02/06 15:54, 77F
推
02/06 18:12, , 78F
02/06 18:12, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)