[問卦] 重機穩穩騎在國道上明明不危險消失
如標題
重機上國道穩穩騎在車道正中央
車速跟上車流,不亂鑽不超速的話其實挺安全的吧?
前方如果出現事故,或車輛出問題
機車因為設計的關係也比汽車更能閃避
整體來看重機的安全性和四輪比起來沒比較差啊
只要好好騎,甚至會更安全
而亂鑽的話,無論是二輪還是四輪都很危險
這樣看起來完全沒道理禁止重型機車上國道
有沒有重機明明不危險,怎麼還禁止上國道的八卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.224.204.56
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1507795837.A.2CC.html
→
10/12 16:11, , 1F
10/12 16:11, 1F
推
10/12 16:11, , 2F
10/12 16:11, 2F
→
10/12 16:11, , 3F
10/12 16:11, 3F
推
10/12 16:11, , 4F
10/12 16:11, 4F
噓
10/12 16:11, , 5F
10/12 16:11, 5F
推
10/12 16:11, , 6F
10/12 16:11, 6F
→
10/12 16:11, , 7F
10/12 16:11, 7F
→
10/12 16:11, , 8F
10/12 16:11, 8F
噓
10/12 16:11, , 9F
10/12 16:11, 9F
推
10/12 16:11, , 10F
10/12 16:11, 10F
→
10/12 16:11, , 11F
10/12 16:11, 11F
推
10/12 16:11, , 12F
10/12 16:11, 12F
推
10/12 16:11, , 13F
10/12 16:11, 13F
推
10/12 16:11, , 14F
10/12 16:11, 14F
→
10/12 16:12, , 15F
10/12 16:12, 15F
噓
10/12 16:12, , 16F
10/12 16:12, 16F
→
10/12 16:12, , 17F
10/12 16:12, 17F
推
10/12 16:12, , 18F
10/12 16:12, 18F
推
10/12 16:12, , 19F
10/12 16:12, 19F
→
10/12 16:12, , 20F
10/12 16:12, 20F
推
10/12 16:12, , 21F
10/12 16:12, 21F
→
10/12 16:12, , 22F
10/12 16:12, 22F
推
10/12 16:12, , 23F
10/12 16:12, 23F
→
10/12 16:13, , 24F
10/12 16:13, 24F
推
10/12 16:13, , 25F
10/12 16:13, 25F
噓
10/12 16:13, , 26F
10/12 16:13, 26F
→
10/12 16:14, , 27F
10/12 16:14, 27F
開放國道後 重機族群就會變守法了阿
不守法的都亂鑽在國道被輾爆啦
※ 編輯: vbqv (36.224.204.56), 10/12/2017 16:15:00
噓
10/12 16:14, , 28F
10/12 16:14, 28F
→
10/12 16:14, , 29F
10/12 16:14, 29F
噓
10/12 16:14, , 30F
10/12 16:14, 30F
四輪給聯結車撞也是會扁
那是不是要禁止普通四輪上國道,通通都給聯結車開就好了?
※ 編輯: vbqv (36.224.204.56), 10/12/2017 16:15:39
推
10/12 16:15, , 31F
10/12 16:15, 31F

噓
10/12 16:15, , 32F
10/12 16:15, 32F
→
10/12 16:15, , 33F
10/12 16:15, 33F
→
10/12 16:15, , 34F
10/12 16:15, 34F
噓
10/12 16:16, , 35F
10/12 16:16, 35F
→
10/12 16:16, , 36F
10/12 16:16, 36F
→
10/12 16:16, , 37F
10/12 16:16, 37F
還有 50 則推文
→
10/12 16:43, , 88F
10/12 16:43, 88F
→
10/12 16:45, , 89F
10/12 16:45, 89F
→
10/12 16:45, , 90F
10/12 16:45, 90F
推
10/12 16:48, , 91F
10/12 16:48, 91F
推
10/12 16:49, , 92F
10/12 16:49, 92F
→
10/12 16:51, , 93F
10/12 16:51, 93F
推
10/12 16:53, , 94F
10/12 16:53, 94F
噓
10/12 17:10, , 95F
10/12 17:10, 95F
推
10/12 17:23, , 96F
10/12 17:23, 96F
噓
10/12 17:45, , 97F
10/12 17:45, 97F
噓
10/12 17:48, , 98F
10/12 17:48, 98F
噓
10/12 17:50, , 99F
10/12 17:50, 99F
→
10/12 17:56, , 100F
10/12 17:56, 100F
→
10/12 17:57, , 101F
10/12 17:57, 101F
→
10/12 17:58, , 102F
10/12 17:58, 102F
→
10/12 17:58, , 103F
10/12 17:58, 103F
→
10/12 18:08, , 104F
10/12 18:08, 104F
推
10/12 18:46, , 105F
10/12 18:46, 105F
噓
10/12 18:48, , 106F
10/12 18:48, 106F
推
10/12 19:13, , 107F
10/12 19:13, 107F
推
10/12 19:15, , 108F
10/12 19:15, 108F
推
10/12 19:30, , 109F
10/12 19:30, 109F
噓
10/12 19:36, , 110F
10/12 19:36, 110F
→
10/12 19:42, , 111F
10/12 19:42, 111F
噓
10/12 19:49, , 112F
10/12 19:49, 112F
→
10/12 20:00, , 113F
10/12 20:00, 113F
噓
10/12 20:01, , 114F
10/12 20:01, 114F
噓
10/12 20:06, , 115F
10/12 20:06, 115F
推
10/12 21:34, , 116F
10/12 21:34, 116F
→
10/12 21:52, , 117F
10/12 21:52, 117F
噓
10/12 22:00, , 118F
10/12 22:00, 118F
噓
10/12 23:46, , 119F
10/12 23:46, 119F
→
10/13 00:50, , 120F
10/13 00:50, 120F
噓
10/13 01:41, , 121F
10/13 01:41, 121F
推
10/13 02:12, , 122F
10/13 02:12, 122F
噓
10/13 07:49, , 123F
10/13 07:49, 123F
→
10/13 07:49, , 124F
10/13 07:49, 124F
推
10/13 09:43, , 125F
10/13 09:43, 125F
→
10/13 09:43, , 126F
10/13 09:43, 126F
→
10/13 09:44, , 127F
10/13 09:44, 127F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇):